Conlang Mailing List – May 2006, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A sample of Tiki vocabulary (2 messages)
• Auxiliary verbs (6 messages)
• Back to the List with More Chomsky (2 messages)
• Bronze age British languages (2 messages)
• Brothers in law (6 messages)
• Brothers-in-law (17 messages)
• Bye, for a little while
• Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (6 messages)
• Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (6 messages)
• Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition) (5 messages)
• Dutch questions (9 messages)
• Fwd: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife
• Fwd: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law)
• Fwd: Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration!
• iljena verse form
• Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (11 messages)
• Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)
• Lexical Relatedness Morphology (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)
• Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (6 messages)
• McGuffey Reader Primer in Kamakawi
• Mythical Mutations (8 messages)
• Non-linear writing systems: an early seed of my idea (3 messages)
• On the design of an ideal language (21 messages)
• OT: Re: [CONLANG] Strawberry Etymology (was: Lexical Relatedness Morphology)
• Penpal? Imäeladi? (3 messages)
• PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae
• RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (2 messages)
• Russian 'zhe' (the word) (6 messages)
• Strawberry Etymology (was: Lexical Relatedness Morphology)
• TECH: Word Processors (2 messages)
• The first conlang (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release) (3 messages)
• Thoughts on nonlinear language & the geometry of propositional thought (2 messages)
• Verb Structure
• Word Processors (4 messages)
• Word used more than once (12 messages)
• Words of derogetory nature.
• [Conlangs-Conf] A couple personal requests
• [Conlangs-Conf] Audio interviews are up.
• [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (7 messages)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Feedback about the conference (for public release)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Press release (4 messages)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Press release - requesting action (3 messages)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (16 messages)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference: getting more concrete (2 messages)
• [Conlangs-Conf] Videos are live!
• [OT] Speech synthesis

1. A sample of Tiki vocabulary
   • Re: A sample of Tiki vocabulary (33 lines)
     From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 14:34:28 -0400
   • Re: A sample of Tiki vocabulary (62 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 21:21:20 -0500

2. Auxiliary verbs
   • Auxiliary verbs (59 lines)
     From: Alain Lemaire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:30:02 -0400
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (52 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:59:19 +0200
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (49 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 22:03:47 +0200
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (36 lines)
     From: Alain Lemaire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 16:20:12 -0400
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (52 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:07:31 +0200
   • Re: Auxiliary verbs (78 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:54:53 +0300

3. Back to the List with More Chomsky
   • Back to the List with More Chomsky (54 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:36:16 -0700
   • Re: Back to the List with More Chomsky (43 lines)
     From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 19:59:31 +0100

4. Bronze age British languages
   • Re: Bronze age British languages (70 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 08:49:17 +0100
   • Re: Bronze age British languages (71 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 20:42:34 +0200

5. Brothers in law
   • Re: Brothers in law (83 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:56:30 -0400
   • Re: Brothers in law (51 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 20:05:06 +0200
   • Re: Brothers in law (73 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 09:47:54 -0800
   • Re: Brothers in law (43 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 16:14:56 -0400
   • Re: Brothers in law (42 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 15:05:13 -0600
   • Re: Brothers in law (63 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 23:34:35 +0200

6. Brothers-in-law
   • Brothers-in-law (64 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 14:13:59 +1000
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (55 lines)
     From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 23:50:32 +1000
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (73 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 16:34:56 -0400
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (46 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 16:38:25 -0400
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (52 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 16:46:35 -0400
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (44 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 00:37:41 +0200
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (43 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 01:57:43 -0500
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (35 lines)
     From: Nik Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 01:59:22 -0500
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (50 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:44:18 +0100
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (94 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 01:58:06 -0800
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (44 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:39:16 +0200
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (63 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 12:29:11 -0400
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (47 lines)
     From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 14:14:34 -0400
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (95 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 10:44:25 -0800
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (41 lines)
     From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:31:03 -0400
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (53 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 16:58:34 +0200
   • Re: Brothers-in-law (39 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:55:27 +0300

7. Bye, for a little while
   • Bye, for a little while (34 lines)
     From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 10:10:30 -0400

8. Common words for man & husband, woman & wife
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (36 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 22:31:59 -0500
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (98 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:03:59 -0800
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (60 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 06:47:14 +0100
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (55 lines)
     From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 09:09:32 +0100
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (79 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:56:28 +0100
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (51 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:10:09 -0400

9. Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law)
   • Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (148 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 20:21:25 +1000
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (97 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 13:33:17 -0400
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (77 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:54:20 +0200
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (317 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 02:53:14 +1000
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (42 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:27:19 +0200
   • Re: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (74 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 13:07:27 -0800

10. Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition)
    • Re: Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition) (63 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 20:19:10 -0400
    • Re: Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition) (57 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 17:28:42 -0700
    • Re: Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition) (54 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:59:22 +0200
    • Re: Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition) (82 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 18:17:13 +0200
    • Re: Comparison of adjectives (was Re: Reviving an old tradition) (43 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 00:46:54 +0200

11. Dutch questions
    • Dutch questions (50 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 10:11:46 +0200
    • Re: Dutch questions (88 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 13:49:23 +0200
    • Re: Dutch questions (45 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 15:46:06 +0200
    • Re: Dutch questions (60 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:25:33 +0200
    • Re: Dutch questions (37 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:32:11 -0400
    • Re: Dutch questions (41 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 18:34:37 -0400
    • Re: Dutch questions (85 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:55:20 -0400
    • Re: Dutch questions (77 lines)
      From: Rob Haden <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:09:50 -0400
    • Re: Dutch questions (74 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:56:49 -0400

12. Fwd: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife
    • Re: Fwd: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (79 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:43:06 +0200

13. Fwd: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law)
    • Fwd: Common words for man & husband, woman & wife (was: Brothers-in-law) (69 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 11:47:03 -0000

14. Fwd: Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration!
    • Fwd: Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (78 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 17:47:56 +0200

15. iljena verse form
    • iljena verse form (62 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 11:43:25 +0100

16. Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language)
    • Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (41 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:27:10 -0400
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (39 lines)
      From: Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 16:37:06 -0300
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (76 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:55:21 -0700
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (58 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 00:55:02 +0100
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (136 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:10:25 +1200
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (31 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 22:40:25 -0500
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (91 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 21:35:40 -0700
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (44 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 08:30:45 +0100
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (129 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 09:17:25 -0400
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (50 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 09:42:26 -0700
    • Re: Impossible Gibberish (was Re: On the design of an ideal language) (51 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 12:40:50 -0700

17. Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)
    • Lexical Relatedness Morphology (wa Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview) (274 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 13:59:33 -0700

18. Lexical Relatedness Morphology (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview)
    • Lexical Relatedness Morphology (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview) (376 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 01:17:46 +1000

19. Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood.
    • Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (86 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 02:00:48 -0800
    • Re: Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (78 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 17:00:52 +0100
    • Re: Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (142 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 10:15:15 -0800
    • Re: Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (121 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 10:57:58 -0800
    • Re: Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:11:31 +0200
    • Re: Marriage, With Child, Sex and motherhood. (115 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 07:35:43 +0100

20. McGuffey Reader Primer in Kamakawi
    • McGuffey Reader Primer in Kamakawi (42 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:40:33 -0700

21. Mythical Mutations
    • Mythical Mutations (30 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 12:43:00 +0100
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (35 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 07:49:53 -0400
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (48 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 13:36:21 +0100
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (54 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 09:04:35 -0400
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (62 lines)
      From: James W. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 08:07:21 -0500
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (46 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 09:20:02 -0400
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (67 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 09:48:07 -0400
    • Re: Mythical Mutations (67 lines)
      From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:37:09 +0100

22. Non-linear writing systems: an early seed of my idea
    • Non-linear writing systems: an early seed of my idea (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:22:53 -0700
    • Re: Non-linear writing systems: an early seed of my idea (58 lines)
      From: Chris Weimer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 00:05:00 -0000
    • Re: Non-linear writing systems: an early seed of my idea (68 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 14:36:25 -0700

23. On the design of an ideal language
    • On the design of an ideal language (84 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 18:39:14 +0100
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (184 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 16:52:37 -0400
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (123 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 23:18:24 +0100
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (104 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 18:52:37 -0400
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (141 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 22:27:57 -0500
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (63 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 18:23:07 +0200
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (44 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 09:44:10 -0700
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (144 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 04:28:44 +0100
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (67 lines)
      From: Jackson Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 01:08:13 -0400
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (47 lines)
      From: Jackson Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 01:31:45 -0400
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (193 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:21:19 -0400
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (56 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 19:00:36 +0200
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (45 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 21:35:26 +0200
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (84 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 22:32:34 +0100
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (75 lines)
      From: Jackson Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 00:24:55 -0400
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (110 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 10:58:56 -0400
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (61 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 02:06:28 +1000
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (66 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 16:15:35 -0400
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (118 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 20:21:19 +1000
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (71 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:56:40 +0100
    • Re: On the design of an ideal language (58 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 13:29:31 -0400

24. OT: Re: [CONLANG] Strawberry Etymology (was: Lexical Relatedness Morphology)
    • OT: Re: [CONLANG] Strawberry Etymology (was: Lexical Relatedness Morphology) (69 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:26:36 +0100

25. Penpal? Imäeladi?
    • Penpal? Imäeladi? (44 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 14:18:47 -0700
    • Re: Penpal? Imäeladi? (40 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 15:58:27 -0700
    • Re: Penpal? Imäeladi? (38 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 10:48:53 -0400

26. PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae
    • PIE Soundchanges - Grassman & Bartholomae (41 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:42:22 -0400

27. RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary
    • RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (43 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:45:36 +0200
    • Re: RESOURCE: Basic and Additional Vocabulary (45 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 14:22:58 -0700

28. Russian 'zhe' (the word)
    • Russian 'zhe' (the word) (42 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:16:12 -0700
    • Re: Russian 'zhe' (the word) (47 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:33:26 -0700
    • Re: Russian 'zhe' (the word) (52 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:39:01 -0700
    • Re: Russian 'zhe' (the word) (60 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 18:46:39 -0400
    • Re: Russian 'zhe' (the word) (73 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 18:48:39 -0400
    • Re: Russian 'zhe' (the word) (39 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 18:50:43 -0400

29. Strawberry Etymology (was: Lexical Relatedness Morphology)
    • Strawberry Etymology (was: Lexical Relatedness Morphology) (64 lines)
      From: Arthaey Angosii <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 14:54:44 -0700

30. TECH: Word Processors
    • TECH: Word Processors (41 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 20:39:55 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Word Processors (53 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 22:24:55 -0500

31. The first conlang (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release)
    • The first conlang (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release) (61 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 16:08:06 +0100
    • Re: The first conlang (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release) (49 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 12:30:04 -0700
    • Re: The first conlang (was: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release) (40 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:25:03 -0800

32. Thoughts on nonlinear language & the geometry of propositional thought
    • Thoughts on nonlinear language & the geometry of propositional thought (31 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 19:14:15 +0100
    • Re: Thoughts on nonlinear language & the geometry of propositional thought (87 lines)
      From: David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:04:47 -0400

33. Verb Structure
    • Verb Structure (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 20:43:25 -0700

34. Word Processors
    • Re: Word Processors (65 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:05:31 -0400
    • Re: Word Processors (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 18:17:13 -0700
    • Re: Word Processors (103 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:47:42 -0400
    • Re: Word Processors (61 lines)
      From: robert wilson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:43:23 -0400

35. Word used more than once
    • Word used more than once (51 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 13:03:23 -0800
    • Re: Word used more than once (59 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:22:56 -0700
    • Re: Word used more than once (43 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:07:46 +0200
    • Re: Word used more than once (51 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:52:46 +0100
    • Re: Word used more than once (104 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 12:15:57 -0800
    • Re: Word used more than once (38 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 21:06:34 -0000
    • Re: Word used more than once (42 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 21:27:53 -0000
    • Re: Word used more than once (41 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 17:51:58 -0400
    • Re: Word used more than once (56 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 22:51:10 +0100
    • Re: Word used more than once (48 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 22:26:02 -0000
    • Re: Word used more than once (40 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:06:56 -0400
    • Re: Word used more than once (39 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:28:58 -0400

36. Words of derogetory nature.
    • Words of derogetory nature. (113 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:11:27 -0800

37. [Conlangs-Conf] A couple personal requests
    • [Conlangs-Conf] A couple personal requests (107 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 00:12:21 -0700

38. [Conlangs-Conf] Audio interviews are up.
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Audio interviews are up. (33 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 21:32:37 -0700

39. [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (54 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 18:51:09 -0700
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (113 lines)
      From: John Quijada <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 21:45:10 -0400
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (45 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 15:53:53 +0200
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (52 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 11:27:54 -0700
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (49 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 21:04:50 +0100
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (251 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 14:39:24 -0700
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Conference Overview (60 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 16:08:48 +0100

40. [Conlangs-Conf] Feedback about the conference (for public release)
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Feedback about the conference (for public release) (442 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 22:43:40 -0700

41. [Conlangs-Conf] Press release
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Press release (81 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 11:22:43 -0700
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release (52 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 14:58:08 -0400
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release (49 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 01:29:54 +0200
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release (53 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 09:52:58 +0100

42. [Conlangs-Conf] Press release - requesting action
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Press release - requesting action (173 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 14:12:01 -0700
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release - requesting action (37 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 17:59:51 -0400
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Press release - requesting action (52 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 20:40:52 -0400

43. [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration!
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 11:38:35 +0200
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (69 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 11:03:53 +0100
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (85 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 05:15:50 -0700
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (124 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 05:49:29 -0700
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (36 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:46:28 +0200
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (44 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 07:54:45 -0700
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (145 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 07:57:05 -0700
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (53 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 16:24:29 +0100
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (48 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:19:28 -0700
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (121 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:20:26 -0700
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (184 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:50:51 -0700
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (36 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 22:07:44 +0100
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (124 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 17:25:30 -0400
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (72 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 16:34:31 +0200
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (54 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 12:16:50 -0400
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference - Pre-pre-registration! (45 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:25:06 +0200

44. [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference: getting more concrete
    • [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference: getting more concrete (52 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 12:42:57 -0700
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Second Language Creation Conference: getting more concrete (40 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 12:54:07 -0700

45. [Conlangs-Conf] Videos are live!
    • Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Videos are live! (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 09:30:40 -0700

46. [OT] Speech synthesis
    • [OT] Speech synthesis (70 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 10:34:02 -0400