Conlang
Mailing List June 2006, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
'Thank you' in a:seka`eni
1200 Graded Sentences for Analysis.
(10 messages)
Andative and Venitive
Consequences of a matrilocal society
(4 messages)
C_j vs Cj vs C_jj
(3 messages)
Fwd: Re: YAEPT:Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
Fwd: YAEPT: track
(2 messages)
Gaelic names (was: names in conlangs)
(3 messages)
History of Yasaro
(3 messages)
Just to test...
(2 messages)
names in conlangs
(10 messages)
NATLANG: Ukrainian question
(3 messages)
Naturalistic conlang spelling reform!
On the design of an ideal language - finally, my (long!) response
(2 messages)
OT civitas (was: OT Roman names)
(2 messages)
OT Roman names
(7 messages)
OT Roman names (was: names in conlangs)
(6 messages)
OT: King George and American Idol?
(2 messages)
OT: TECH: Reply-to headers and gmail (was YAEPT: track)
(2 messages)
Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(27 messages)
Semantic content of 'thank you'
Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(11 messages)
Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(52 messages)
TECH: help, special characters
(4 messages)
TECH: Web server problem
(2 messages)
test again, please ignore again
test, please ignore
The opposite of resumptive
(8 messages)
USAGE: Con-graphies
(5 messages)
word creation
(5 messages)
YAEPT: track
(22 messages)
YAEPT:Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(2 messages)
YAEPT:Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(8 messages)
'Thank you' in a:seka`eni
Re: 'Thank you' in a:seka`eni
(49 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
1200 Graded Sentences for Analysis.
1200 Graded Sentences for Analysis.
(48 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1200 Graded Sentences for Analysis.
(30 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1200 Graded Sentences for Analysis.
(47 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1200 Graded Sentences for Analysis.
(60 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1200 Graded Sentences for Analysis.
(69 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1200 Graded Sentences for Analysis.
(81 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1200 Graded Sentences for Analysis.
(34 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1200 Graded Sentences for Analysis.
(67 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1200 Graded Sentences for Analysis.
(41 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1200 Graded Sentences for Analysis.
(54 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Andative and Venitive
Andative and Venitive
(46 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Consequences of a matrilocal society
Consequences of a matrilocal society
(36 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consequences of a matrilocal society
(45 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consequences of a matrilocal society
(62 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Consequences of a matrilocal society
(62 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
C_j vs Cj vs C_jj
C_j vs Cj vs C_jj
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: C_j vs Cj vs C_jj
(48 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: C_j vs Cj vs C_jj
(61 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Re: YAEPT:Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
Fwd: Re: YAEPT:Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(54 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: YAEPT: track
Fwd: YAEPT: track
(44 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fwd: YAEPT: track
(39 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gaelic names (was: names in conlangs)
Gaelic names (was: names in conlangs)
(63 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaelic names (was: names in conlangs)
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gaelic names (was: names in conlangs)
(68 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
History of Yasaro
History of Yasaro
(68 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: History of Yasaro
(91 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: History of Yasaro
(96 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Just to test...
Just to test...
(45 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Just to test...
(27 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
names in conlangs
Re: names in conlangs
(67 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: names in conlangs
(94 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: names in conlangs
(66 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: names in conlangs
(128 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: names in conlangs
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: names in conlangs
(69 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: names in conlangs
(38 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: names in conlangs
(60 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: names in conlangs
(57 lines)
From:
Cian Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: names in conlangs
(35 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANG: Ukrainian question
NATLANG: Ukrainian question
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Ukrainian question
(58 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANG: Ukrainian question
(52 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Naturalistic conlang spelling reform!
Re: Naturalistic conlang spelling reform!
(74 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
On the design of an ideal language - finally, my (long!) response
On the design of an ideal language - finally, my (long!) response
(537 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: On the design of an ideal language - finally, my (long!) response
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT civitas (was: OT Roman names)
OT civitas (was: OT Roman names)
(98 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT civitas (was: OT Roman names)
(163 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Roman names
Re: OT Roman names
(101 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Roman names
(49 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Roman names
(67 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Roman names
(45 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Roman names
(93 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Roman names
(44 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Roman names
(46 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Roman names (was: names in conlangs)
OT Roman names (was: names in conlangs)
(87 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Roman names (was: names in conlangs)
(46 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Roman names (was: names in conlangs)
(45 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Roman names (was: names in conlangs)
(70 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Roman names (was: names in conlangs)
(56 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Roman names (was: names in conlangs)
(46 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: King George and American Idol?
OT: King George and American Idol?
(41 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: King George and American Idol?
(46 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: TECH: Reply-to headers and gmail (was YAEPT: track)
OT: TECH: Reply-to headers and gmail (was YAEPT: track)
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: TECH: Reply-to headers and gmail (was YAEPT: track)
(39 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(64 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(58 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(65 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(73 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(53 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(85 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(39 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(70 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(41 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(51 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(59 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(73 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(205 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(85 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(40 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(33 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(68 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(40 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(73 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(75 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(53 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(56 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(53 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Semantic content of 'thank you'
Re: Semantic content of 'thank you'
(55 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(70 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(81 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(100 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(147 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(62 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(57 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(64 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(95 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(101 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(66 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(45 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(48 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(48 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(59 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(41 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(47 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(65 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(53 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(49 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(49 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(47 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(56 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(64 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(72 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(45 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(54 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(36 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(67 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(53 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(82 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(44 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(63 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(75 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(40 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(57 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(64 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(86 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(62 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(56 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(92 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(69 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(54 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(58 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(196 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(53 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Shaw alphabet (was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies)
(96 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: help, special characters
TECH: help, special characters
(41 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: help, special characters
(67 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: help, special characters
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: help, special characters
(88 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Web server problem
TECH: Web server problem
(114 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Web server problem
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
test again, please ignore again
test again, please ignore again
(37 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
test, please ignore
test, please ignore
(37 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
The opposite of resumptive
The opposite of resumptive
(52 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The opposite of resumptive
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The opposite of resumptive
(42 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The opposite of resumptive
(70 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The opposite of resumptive
(58 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The opposite of resumptive
(70 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The opposite of resumptive
(60 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The opposite of resumptive
(44 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Con-graphies
USAGE: Con-graphies
(109 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(70 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(63 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(57 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
word creation
word creation
(41 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: word creation
(41 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: word creation
(41 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: word creation
(39 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: word creation
(45 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT: track
YAEPT: track
(29 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
YAEPT: track
(31 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: YAEPT: track
(54 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(50 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(45 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(40 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(56 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(113 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(59 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(101 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(124 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(44 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(120 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(46 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(80 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(98 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(101 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(49 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(43 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(67 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: track
(66 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT:Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
YAEPT:Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(43 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT:Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(75 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT:Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
YAEPT:Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(69 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT:Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(593 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT:Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(79 lines)
From:
Joe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT:Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(81 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT:Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(826 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT:Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(69 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT:Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(37 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT:Re: Shavian: was Re: USAGE: Con-graphies
(77 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU