Conlang
Mailing List June 2006, week 4
Sort by
Author
| Date |
Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Re: those irregular prepositions
(122 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personality Question
(85 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(68 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(50 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(30 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personality Question
(64 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(67 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
(79 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: those irregular prepositions
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: YAEPT: emphasis
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: YAEPT: emphasis
(63 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(38 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(154 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: those irregular prepositions
(51 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: YAEPT: emphasis
(53 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(52 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Participles and Other Verbals, vs Relative Clauses and Other Subordinate Clauses, in Conlangs and Natlangs
(95 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: YAEPT: emphasis
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: those irregular prepositions
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personality Question
(55 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personality Question
(47 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: YAEPT: emphasis
(62 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personality Question
(53 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: YAEPT: emphasis
(52 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(56 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: those irregular prepositions
(48 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(68 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What texts are most translated?
(119 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(43 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: those irregular prepositions
(45 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: emphasis
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(72 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: YAEPT: emphasis
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: emphasis
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(34 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(81 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(47 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: those irregular prepositions
(45 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Creating New Words
(54 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(74 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creating New Words
(49 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(64 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creating New Words
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(47 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(99 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(42 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Defining words and how they are used
(105 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: those irregular prepositions
(31 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creating New Words
(99 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Defining words and how they are used
(34 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(153 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(51 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(45 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: those irregular prepositions
(53 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(55 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Re: Defining words and how they are used
(47 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: those irregular prepositions
(53 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(265 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(84 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Defining words and how they are used
(65 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Class handouts on Linguistic Universals
(43 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Class handouts on Linguistic Universals
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(43 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Creating New Words
(52 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: those irregular prepositions
(65 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personality Question
(38 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(56 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What texts are most translated?
(78 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Defining words and how they are used
(128 lines)
From:
Joseph B. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Defining words and how they are used
(76 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(40 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: those irregular prepositions
(65 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(52 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(36 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(58 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: those irregular prepositions
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(61 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(69 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(108 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE? Re: Defining words and how they are used
(277 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(66 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(206 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Diachronic Origin of Verbals and Dependent Clauses
(107 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personality Question
(36 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(43 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Defining words and how they are used
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(58 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(78 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(65 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used"
(279 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(70 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What texts are most translated?
(74 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
A personal curiosity
(36 lines)
From:
Israel Noletto <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(148 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(68 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(59 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality
(73 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(80 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(47 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(39 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(69 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Defining words and how they are used
(38 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(50 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(66 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(43 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(38 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(60 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
help with description
(28 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(53 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contra (was: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(41 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Contra (was: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
(50 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Defining words and how they are used
(76 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(48 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
NonVerbal Conlang?
(71 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(107 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(126 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(76 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(42 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(76 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(48 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(68 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(61 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(59 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What texts are most translated?
(60 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used"
(74 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Stacked diacritics
(54 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(51 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(41 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(48 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Defining words and how they are used
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used"
(54 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Defining words and how they are used
(43 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Defining words and how they are used
(59 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fw: NonVerbal Conlang?
(104 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(73 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(69 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(85 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stacked diacritics
(47 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(124 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used"
(65 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: neologisms for neography (was: Defining words and how they are used)
(96 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(45 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: help with description
(34 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stacked diacritics
(34 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(42 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A personal curiosity
(52 lines)
From:
Joseph B. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(43 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Multi-modal communication
(60 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A personal curiosity
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(47 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(67 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
(41 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Personality Question
(61 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(99 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
(43 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(96 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A personal curiosity
(55 lines)
From:
Cian Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(63 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Parsing for meaning.
(122 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A personal curiosity
(54 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Icelandic 'sem'/Swedish 'som' etymology?
(43 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(123 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Stacked diacritics
(49 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning.
(142 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning.
(53 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning.
(111 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning.
(55 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fw: NonVerbal Conlang?
(121 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multi-modal communication
(83 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multi-modal communication
(44 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(111 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(72 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Icelandic 'sem'/Swedish 'som' etymology?
(78 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(63 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Icelandic 'sem'/Swedish 'som' etymology?
(77 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning.
(318 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning.
(64 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning.
(89 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Icelandic 'sem'/Swedish 'som' etymology?
(76 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Icelandic 'sem'/Swedish 'som' etymology?
(61 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning.
(96 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Dumped it!!
(48 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(78 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning.
(208 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Dumped it!!
(52 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Participles and Other Verbals, vs Relative Clauses and Other Subordinate Clauses, in Conlangs and Natlangs
(70 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Focus Fronting In My Latest
(40 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(50 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(94 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(80 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Re: Dumped it!!
(87 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(62 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Strategies for disambiguating ad*
(89 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(64 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: more help?
(72 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad*
(89 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relative clauses
(37 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad*
(30 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses
(60 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: those irregular prepositions
(45 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses
(74 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Prithmahler Len Maltha?
(77 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tinkering versus creativity
(47 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(105 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad*
(98 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses
(77 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses
(75 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Corrections: Strategies for disambiguating ad*
(46 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(49 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(54 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(121 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(69 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(80 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(70 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(87 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(40 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses
(60 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: test, please ignore
(40 lines)
From:
Stephen Mulraney <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(87 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(104 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(54 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(111 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(131 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(147 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fw: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(70 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(46 lines)
From:
Doug Dee <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses
(87 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad*
(68 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Re: Relative clauses
(47 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
a request
(34 lines)
From:
Rodlox R <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses
(63 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a request
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(51 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses
(60 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses
(37 lines)
From:
Chris Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses
(202 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(126 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses
(51 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses
(53 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a request
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
ANNOUNCE: schcompile: new version
(45 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad*
(173 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Defining words and how they are used
(70 lines)
From:
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fwd: Re: Relative clauses
(70 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relative clauses
(170 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad*
(74 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(46 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad*
(139 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(76 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(55 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT (?) Balkan Sprachbund (was: Relative clauses)
(58 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(61 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(45 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(123 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT (?) Balkan Sprachbund
(116 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad*
(129 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT (?) Balkan Sprachbund
(49 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: What IS language anyway?
(150 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(127 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(164 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NonVerbal Conlang?
(90 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fw: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(82 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: What IS language anyway?
(40 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU