Conlang Mailing List – June 2006, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A personal curiosity (5 messages)
• a request (3 messages)
• ANNOUNCE: schcompile: new version
• Class handouts on Linguistic Universals (2 messages)
• Contra (was: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (2 messages)
• Corrections: Strategies for disambiguating ad*
• Creating New Words (5 messages)
• Defining words and how they are used (11 messages)
• Focus Fronting In My Latest
• Fw: NonVerbal Conlang? (2 messages)
• Fw: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (2 messages)
• Fwd: Re: Relative clauses (2 messages)
• Fwd: Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
• help with description (2 messages)
• Icelandic 'sem'/Swedish 'som' etymology? (5 messages)
• Multi-modal communication (3 messages)
• NonVerbal Conlang? (34 messages)
• Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (14 messages)
• OT (?) Balkan Sprachbund (2 messages)
• OT (?) Balkan Sprachbund (was: Relative clauses)
• OT Re: Defining words and how they are used
• OT Re: Dumped it!!
• OT Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (2 messages)
• OT: Defining words and how they are used
• OT: Dumped it!! (2 messages)
• OT: Tinkering versus creativity (23 messages)
• OT: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (4 messages)
• OT: YAEPT: emphasis (7 messages)
• Participles and Other Verbals, vs Relative Clauses and Other Subordinate Clauses, in Conlangs and Natlangs (2 messages)
• Personality Question (8 messages)
• Prithmahler Len Maltha?
• Relative clauses (14 messages)
• Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
• Stacked diacritics (3 messages)
• Strategies for disambiguating ad* (9 messages)
• TECH: more help? (16 messages)
• TECH: test, please ignore
• THEORY: Diachronic Origin of Verbals and Dependent Clauses
• THEORY: Parsing for meaning. (10 messages)
• THEORY: What IS language anyway? (2 messages)
• those irregular prepositions (14 messages)
• Tinkering versus creativity
• USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (11 messages)
• USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used" (4 messages)
• USAGE: neologisms for neography (was: Defining words and how they are used)
• USAGE: Stacked diacritics
• USAGE? Re: Defining words and how they are used
• Verbal Inflection for Formality (16 messages)
• we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (12 messages)
• What texts are most translated? (4 messages)
• YAEPT: emphasis (2 messages)

1. A personal curiosity
   • A personal curiosity (36 lines)
     From: Israel Noletto <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A personal curiosity (52 lines)
     From: Joseph B. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A personal curiosity (56 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A personal curiosity (55 lines)
     From: Cian Ross <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A personal curiosity (54 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

2. a request
   • a request (34 lines)
     From: Rodlox R <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: a request (37 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: a request (49 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

3. ANNOUNCE: schcompile: new version
   • ANNOUNCE: schcompile: new version (45 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

4. Class handouts on Linguistic Universals
   • Class handouts on Linguistic Universals (43 lines)
     From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Class handouts on Linguistic Universals (49 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

5. Contra (was: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
   • Re: Contra (was: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (62 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Contra (was: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (50 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

6. Corrections: Strategies for disambiguating ad*
   • Re: Corrections: Strategies for disambiguating ad* (46 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

7. Creating New Words
   • Creating New Words (54 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating New Words (49 lines)
     From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating New Words (41 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating New Words (99 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Creating New Words (52 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

8. Defining words and how they are used
   • Defining words and how they are used (105 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defining words and how they are used (34 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defining words and how they are used (65 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defining words and how they are used (128 lines)
     From: Joseph B. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defining words and how they are used (76 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defining words and how they are used (48 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defining words and how they are used (76 lines)
     From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defining words and how they are used (36 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defining words and how they are used (43 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defining words and how they are used (59 lines)
     From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defining words and how they are used (70 lines)
     From: Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>

9. Focus Fronting In My Latest
   • Focus Fronting In My Latest (40 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

10. Fw: NonVerbal Conlang?
    • Fw: NonVerbal Conlang? (104 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Fw: NonVerbal Conlang? (121 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>

11. Fw: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
    • Fw: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (70 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fw: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (82 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

12. Fwd: Re: Relative clauses
    • Fwd: Re: Relative clauses (47 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fwd: Re: Relative clauses (70 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

13. Fwd: Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
    • Fwd: Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (69 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

14. help with description
    • help with description (28 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: help with description (34 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

15. Icelandic 'sem'/Swedish 'som' etymology?
    • Icelandic 'sem'/Swedish 'som' etymology? (43 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Icelandic 'sem'/Swedish 'som' etymology? (78 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Icelandic 'sem'/Swedish 'som' etymology? (77 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Icelandic 'sem'/Swedish 'som' etymology? (76 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Icelandic 'sem'/Swedish 'som' etymology? (61 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

16. Multi-modal communication
    • Multi-modal communication (60 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Multi-modal communication (83 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Multi-modal communication (44 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

17. NonVerbal Conlang?
    • NonVerbal Conlang? (71 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (126 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (76 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (42 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (76 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (48 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (68 lines)
      From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (61 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (59 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (51 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (41 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (73 lines)
      From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (69 lines)
      From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (85 lines)
      From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (124 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (45 lines)
      From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (67 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (96 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (34 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (63 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (111 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (72 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (63 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (78 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (105 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (121 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (70 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (87 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (40 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (76 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (55 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (123 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (127 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: NonVerbal Conlang? (90 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

18. Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions)
    • Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (56 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (43 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (72 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (34 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (47 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (74 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (64 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (42 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (51 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (84 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (40 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (69 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (39 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Offensive stress (was: those irregular prepositions) (60 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

19. OT (?) Balkan Sprachbund
    • Re: OT (?) Balkan Sprachbund (116 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT (?) Balkan Sprachbund (49 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

20. OT (?) Balkan Sprachbund (was: Relative clauses)
    • OT (?) Balkan Sprachbund (was: Relative clauses) (58 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

21. OT Re: Defining words and how they are used
    • OT Re: Defining words and how they are used (47 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

22. OT Re: Dumped it!!
    • OT Re: Dumped it!! (87 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>

23. OT Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
    • OT Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (66 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • OT Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (80 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>

24. OT: Defining words and how they are used
    • OT: Defining words and how they are used (38 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

25. OT: Dumped it!!
    • OT: Dumped it!! (48 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Dumped it!! (52 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

26. OT: Tinkering versus creativity
    • OT: Tinkering versus creativity (36 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (47 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (50 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (52 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (94 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (80 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (49 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (54 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (69 lines)
      From: Mark Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (80 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (87 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (104 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (54 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (111 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (131 lines)
      From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (147 lines)
      From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (46 lines)
      From: Doug Dee <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (51 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (126 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (46 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (61 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (45 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity (164 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

27. OT: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
    • OT: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (59 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (57 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (48 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

28. OT: YAEPT: emphasis
    • OT: YAEPT: emphasis (50 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: YAEPT: emphasis (63 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: YAEPT: emphasis (53 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: YAEPT: emphasis (57 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: YAEPT: emphasis (62 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: YAEPT: emphasis (52 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: YAEPT: emphasis (49 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

29. Participles and Other Verbals, vs Relative Clauses and Other Subordinate Clauses, in Conlangs and Natlangs
    • Participles and Other Verbals, vs Relative Clauses and Other Subordinate Clauses, in Conlangs and Natlangs (95 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Participles and Other Verbals, vs Relative Clauses and Other Subordinate Clauses, in Conlangs and Natlangs (70 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

30. Personality Question
    • Re: Personality Question (85 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Personality Question (64 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Personality Question (55 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Personality Question (47 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Personality Question (53 lines)
      From: daniel prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Personality Question (38 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Personality Question (36 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Personality Question (61 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

31. Prithmahler Len Maltha?
    • Prithmahler Len Maltha? (77 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

32. Relative clauses
    • Relative clauses (37 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative clauses (60 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative clauses (74 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative clauses (77 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative clauses (75 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative clauses (60 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative clauses (87 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative clauses (63 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative clauses (60 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative clauses (37 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative clauses (202 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative clauses (51 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative clauses (53 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Relative clauses (170 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

33. Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA
    • Re: Schwa and [V]: Learning the IPA (79 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

34. Stacked diacritics
    • Stacked diacritics (54 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stacked diacritics (47 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Stacked diacritics (34 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

35. Strategies for disambiguating ad*
    • Strategies for disambiguating ad* (89 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad* (89 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad* (30 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad* (98 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad* (68 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad* (173 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad* (74 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad* (139 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Strategies for disambiguating ad* (129 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

36. TECH: more help?
    • Re: TECH: more help? (67 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (38 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (52 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (68 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (81 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (47 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (43 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (78 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (70 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (66 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (107 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (99 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (123 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (62 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (64 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: more help? (72 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

37. TECH: test, please ignore
    • TECH: test, please ignore (40 lines)
      From: Stephen Mulraney <[log in to unmask]>

38. THEORY: Diachronic Origin of Verbals and Dependent Clauses
    • THEORY: Diachronic Origin of Verbals and Dependent Clauses (107 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

39. THEORY: Parsing for meaning.
    • THEORY: Parsing for meaning. (122 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning. (142 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning. (53 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning. (111 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning. (55 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning. (318 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning. (64 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning. (89 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning. (96 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: Parsing for meaning. (208 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

40. THEORY: What IS language anyway?
    • THEORY: What IS language anyway? (150 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: THEORY: What IS language anyway? (40 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

41. those irregular prepositions
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (122 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (48 lines)
      From: Tristan Alexander McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (51 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (48 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (45 lines)
      From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (45 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (31 lines)
      From: daniel prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (53 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (53 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (65 lines)
      From: Mark Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (65 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (49 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: those irregular prepositions (45 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

42. Tinkering versus creativity
    • Re: Tinkering versus creativity (47 lines)
      From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>

43. USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used
    • USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (56 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (52 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (36 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (58 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (61 lines)
      From: Keith Gaughan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (108 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (148 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (68 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (43 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (42 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used (43 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

44. USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used"
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used" (279 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used" (74 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used" (54 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE Re: Defining words and how they are used" (65 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

45. USAGE: neologisms for neography (was: Defining words and how they are used)
    • USAGE: neologisms for neography (was: Defining words and how they are used) (96 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

46. USAGE: Stacked diacritics
    • Re: USAGE: Stacked diacritics (49 lines)
      From: Shreyas Sampat <[log in to unmask]>

47. USAGE? Re: Defining words and how they are used
    • USAGE? Re: Defining words and how they are used (277 lines)
      From: Michael Adams <[log in to unmask]>

48. Verbal Inflection for Formality
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (68 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (50 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (30 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (154 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (57 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (99 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (42 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (153 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (45 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (55 lines)
      From: Chris Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (265 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (206 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (43 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (58 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (65 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verbal Inflection for Formality (73 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

49. we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions)
    • Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (47 lines)
      From: daniel prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (60 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (50 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (43 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (38 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (53 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (41 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (48 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (43 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (47 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: we quaint Brits (was: those irregular prepositions) (41 lines)
      From: daniel prohaska <[log in to unmask]>

50. What texts are most translated?
    • Re: What texts are most translated? (119 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What texts are most translated? (78 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What texts are most translated? (74 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What texts are most translated? (60 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>

51. YAEPT: emphasis
    • Re: YAEPT: emphasis (47 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: emphasis (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>