Conlang
Mailing List July 2006, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Þrjótran: Lesson 17b: HvÃ
(2 messages)
Þrjótran: Lesson 17b: Hví
(2 messages)
a request
(7 messages)
Animated glyphs
(2 messages)
Books for sanskrit self-study
(4 messages)
CHAT: German help
(2 messages)
Chickenese - natlang or artlang?
(2 messages)
ConScripts
(7 messages)
Fw: What is it we are saying in our languages?
Going nomail for vacations
(2 messages)
Hilarious lexicon entry...
(2 messages)
Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(12 messages)
Metrical meanderings
(10 messages)
Multimodal language (was: Wordless language (was: NonVerbal Conlang?))
(6 messages)
Music-conlangs & music
(21 messages)
NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(7 messages)
Numbers in a:seka`eni
(3 messages)
One major NLF2DWS flaw: density / compactness
(4 messages)
OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(3 messages)
PHONOLOGY: FW: 17.1919, Software: Sound Patterns Database
Reinventing NATLANGs
(5 messages)
Semantic precision and (vs?) context / pragmatics / culture
(4 messages)
SKETCH: A conlang based on music (was: Music-conlangs & music)
(6 messages)
Slang
(4 messages)
SV: Re: Multimodal language (was: Wordless language (was: NonVerbal Conlang?))
SV: Re: Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
TECH: a word generator with reduplication?
TECH: another dumb question
(3 messages)
TECH: Language Detection
(13 messages)
TECH: Monospaced Unicode fonts?
(6 messages)
The opposite of resumptive
THEORY: "semantically grounded ethnopragmatics" - Book: Goddard (Ed)
THEORY: FW: 17.1925, Calls: Theoretical Linguistics
(2 messages)
Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(3 messages)
What is it we are saying in our languages?
(22 messages)
Why we are here. (wasRe: OT: Tinkering versus creativity)
(3 messages)
Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
(10 messages)
YAEPT: Australian Milo
(7 messages)
YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(5 messages)
[Conlangs-Conf] Order your DVDs now! (Plus some misc conference info...)
(3 messages)
[OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(9 messages)
Þrjótran: Lesson 17b: HvÃ
Re: Þrjótran: Lesson 17b: HvÃ
(394 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Þrjótran: Lesson 17b: HvÃ
(46 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Þrjótran: Lesson 17b: Hví
Re: Þrjótran: Lesson 17b: Hví
(53 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Þrjótran: Lesson 17b: Hví
(65 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
a request
Re: a request
(39 lines)
From:
youngayatollah <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a request
(43 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a request
(39 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a request
(46 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a request
(57 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a request
(48 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: a request
(60 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Animated glyphs
Animated glyphs
(31 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animated glyphs
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Books for sanskrit self-study
Re: Books for sanskrit self-study
(56 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books for sanskrit self-study
(43 lines)
From:
Tomujin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books for sanskrit self-study
(23 lines)
From:
Kalle Bergman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books for sanskrit self-study
(52 lines)
From:
Jean-François Colson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: German help
Re: CHAT: German help
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: German help
(57 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chickenese - natlang or artlang?
Re: Chickenese - natlang or artlang?
(56 lines)
From:
Paul Joseph Schleitwiler, FCM <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chickenese - natlang or artlang?
(82 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
ConScripts
ConScripts
(36 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ConScripts
(46 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ConScripts
(63 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ConScripts
(51 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ConScripts
(56 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ConScripts
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ConScripts
(89 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fw: What is it we are saying in our languages?
Fw: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(148 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going nomail for vacations
Going nomail for vacations
(31 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Going nomail for vacations
(42 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hilarious lexicon entry...
Hilarious lexicon entry...
(46 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hilarious lexicon entry...
(58 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(59 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(70 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(58 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(102 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(92 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(50 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(54 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(70 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(81 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(91 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(43 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(46 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Metrical meanderings
Metrical meanderings
(75 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metrical meanderings
(107 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metrical meanderings
(122 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metrical meanderings
(90 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metrical meanderings
(129 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metrical meanderings
(61 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metrical meanderings
(55 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metrical meanderings
(62 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metrical meanderings
(77 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Metrical meanderings
(65 lines)
From:
Dan Sulani <
[log in to unmask]
>
Multimodal language (was: Wordless language (was: NonVerbal Conlang?))
Multimodal language (was: Wordless language (was: NonVerbal Conlang?))
(117 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multimodal language (was: Wordless language (was: NonVerbal Conlang?))
(167 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multimodal language (was: Wordless language (was: NonVerbal Conlang?))
(199 lines)
From:
Kalle Bergman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multimodal language (was: Wordless language (was: NonVerbal Conlang?))
(279 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multimodal language (was: Wordless language (was: NonVerbal Conlang?))
(94 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Multimodal language (was: Wordless language (was: NonVerbal Conlang?))
(59 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Music-conlangs & music
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(201 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(185 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(94 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(85 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(76 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(61 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(96 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(81 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(100 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(91 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(168 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(60 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(32 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(56 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(56 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(71 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(123 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(66 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(93 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(93 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(41 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(43 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(47 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(40 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(50 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Numbers in a:seka`eni
Numbers in a:seka`eni
(178 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numbers in a:seka`eni
(31 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Numbers in a:seka`eni
(189 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
One major NLF2DWS flaw: density / compactness
One major NLF2DWS flaw: density / compactness
(151 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: One major NLF2DWS flaw: density / compactness
(335 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: One major NLF2DWS flaw: density / compactness
(210 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: One major NLF2DWS flaw: density / compactness
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Tinkering versus creativity
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(56 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(40 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Tinkering versus creativity
(62 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
PHONOLOGY: FW: 17.1919, Software: Sound Patterns Database
PHONOLOGY: FW: 17.1919, Software: Sound Patterns Database
(87 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reinventing NATLANGs
Reinventing NATLANGs
(77 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(59 lines)
From:
Damien Perrotin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(77 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(37 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(92 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Semantic precision and (vs?) context / pragmatics / culture
Semantic precision and (vs?) context / pragmatics / culture
(49 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semantic precision and (vs?) context / pragmatics / culture
(54 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semantic precision and (vs?) context / pragmatics / culture
(74 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Semantic precision and (vs?) context / pragmatics / culture
(105 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
SKETCH: A conlang based on music (was: Music-conlangs & music)
SKETCH: A conlang based on music (was: Music-conlangs & music)
(42 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SKETCH: A conlang based on music (was: Music-conlangs & music)
(47 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SKETCH: A conlang based on music (was: Music-conlangs & music)
(43 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SKETCH: A conlang based on music (was: Music-conlangs & music)
(64 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SKETCH: A conlang based on music (was: Music-conlangs & music)
(77 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: SKETCH: A conlang based on music (was: Music-conlangs & music)
(47 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Slang
Slang
(60 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slang
(65 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slang
(136 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Slang
(75 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
SV: Re: Multimodal language (was: Wordless language (was: NonVerbal Conlang?))
SV: Re: Multimodal language (was: Wordless language (was: NonVerbal Conlang?))
(325 lines)
From:
Kalle Bergman <
[log in to unmask]
>
SV: Re: Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
SV: Re: Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
(47 lines)
From:
Kalle Bergman <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: a word generator with reduplication?
TECH: a word generator with reduplication?
(31 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: another dumb question
TECH: another dumb question
(43 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: another dumb question
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: another dumb question
(62 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Language Detection
TECH: Language Detection
(42 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Language Detection
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Language Detection
(28 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Language Detection
(35 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Language Detection
(43 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Language Detection
(77 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Language Detection
(51 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Language Detection
(48 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Language Detection
(52 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Language Detection
(40 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Language Detection
(48 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Language Detection
(30 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Language Detection
(31 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Monospaced Unicode fonts?
TECH: Monospaced Unicode fonts?
(42 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Monospaced Unicode fonts?
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Monospaced Unicode fonts?
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Monospaced Unicode fonts?
(49 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Monospaced Unicode fonts?
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Monospaced Unicode fonts?
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
The opposite of resumptive
Re: The opposite of resumptive
(45 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: "semantically grounded ethnopragmatics" - Book: Goddard (Ed)
THEORY: "semantically grounded ethnopragmatics" - Book: Goddard (Ed)
(115 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: FW: 17.1925, Calls: Theoretical Linguistics
THEORY: FW: 17.1925, Calls: Theoretical Linguistics
(160 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: FW: 17.1925, Calls: Theoretical Linguistics
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(31 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(57 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
What is it we are saying in our languages?
What is it we are saying in our languages?
(65 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(83 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(138 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(65 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(42 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(121 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(113 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(91 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(98 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(95 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(113 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(69 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(74 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(135 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(65 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(56 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(125 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(73 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(100 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(65 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?
(56 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Why we are here. (wasRe: OT: Tinkering versus creativity)
Why we are here. (wasRe: OT: Tinkering versus creativity)
(47 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why we are here. (wasRe: OT: Tinkering versus creativity)
(41 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Why we are here. (wasRe: OT: Tinkering versus creativity)
(79 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
Re: Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
(91 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
(192 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
(128 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
(49 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
(78 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
(58 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
(51 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
(71 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
(548 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wordless language (WAS: NonVerbal Conlang?)
(358 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT: Australian Milo
Re: YAEPT: Australian Milo
(55 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Australian Milo
(59 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Australian Milo
(74 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Australian Milo
(51 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Australian Milo
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Australian Milo
(63 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Australian Milo
(67 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(24 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(71 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(78 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(41 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Conlangs-Conf] Order your DVDs now! (Plus some misc conference info...)
[Conlangs-Conf] Order your DVDs now! (Plus some misc conference info...)
(99 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Order your DVDs now! (Plus some misc conference info...)
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [Conlangs-Conf] Order your DVDs now! (Plus some misc conference info...)
(40 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
[OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(28 lines)
From:
Kalle Bergman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(51 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(50 lines)
From:
Damien Perrotin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(31 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(78 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(61 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(59 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(99 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU