Conlang
Mailing List July 2006, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
(not really "Re: Anti-telic?:" any longer)
(2 messages)
<No subject>
Adapting non-Latin scripts
(2 messages)
Anti-telic?
(21 messages)
Archeology on Iceland?
(2 messages)
CA Bay Area (and nearby) conlang meetup next month
Carmina Burana (was help with medieval Latin)
(2 messages)
Characters: What are they?
(4 messages)
ConScripts
(4 messages)
CXS (was: Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?)
(3 messages)
Ethiopia et al. (was NATLANGS: What's that writing system?)
(3 messages)
Fluency in conlangs (was Re: Megdevi Book (...))
Fw: Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
Fw: Power of the Word
Fw: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
Fwd: Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
Gnomic vs eternal; also, telic vs atelic. (was: Re: Anti-telic?)
Hilarious lexicon entry...
(2 messages)
Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
Invitation to new 'conlang' wiki
(9 messages)
Jovian phonological changes (WAS: Re: Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua)
medieval Latin translation help needed
(5 messages)
medieval Latin translation help needed/ Re: Carmina Burana (was help with medieval Latin)
(2 messages)
Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
(10 messages)
Music-conlangs & music
(2 messages)
Musical language phonology
(2 messages)
NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(13 messages)
New Musical/Tonal Language: Nibuzigu
(4 messages)
NLF2DWS example (not mine)
none
(3 messages)
Onset/Rhyme Scripts
(3 messages)
OT: Re: No rants! (USAGE: di"f"thong)
OT: THEORY Fusion Grammar
(5 messages)
Reinventing NATLANGs
(22 messages)
resend? Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
Samhain (was Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago")
(4 messages)
SKETCH: A conlang based on music (was: Music-conlangs & music)
Takiyyudin phonology
(9 messages)
TECH: "searching" for fontmakers, etc.
TECH: another dumb question
(2 messages)
TECH: Déja Vu Mono (was: Re: <No subject given>)
TECH: Language Detection
Tenses -- any comments?
(3 messages)
THEORY: Laxness?
(2 messages)
Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(49 messages)
Unknown pronoun
(3 messages)
USAGE: "anthropomorphic"
(11 messages)
USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(34 messages)
USAGE: Other Note more on topic - Inuit jargon?
(2 messages)
Vowel Harmony in Proto-Thagojian
Vowel height harmony (fuit Takiyyudin phonology)
Whatever
(5 messages)
Whats that Writing System?
YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(22 messages)
YAESRT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(4 messages)
[Conlangs-Conf] 2nd Language Creation Conference - current state of planning, talks, & some feedback request
[OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(12 messages)
[p]>[m]?
(5 messages)
(not really "Re: Anti-telic?:" any longer)
(not really "Re: Anti-telic?:" any longer)
(347 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: (not really "Re: Anti-telic?:" any longer)
(131 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
<No subject>
<No subject>
(37 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Adapting non-Latin scripts
Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts
(61 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Adapting non-Latin scripts
(91 lines)
From:
Abrigon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Anti-telic?
Anti-telic?
(39 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(69 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(71 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(110 lines)
From:
Kalle Bergman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(176 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(44 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(93 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(77 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(194 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(136 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(143 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(936 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(84 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(208 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(176 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(60 lines)
From:
Rodlox R <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(70 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(225 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(61 lines)
From:
Rodlox R <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Anti-telic?
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Archeology on Iceland?
Archeology on Iceland?
(72 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Archeology on Iceland?
(37 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
CA Bay Area (and nearby) conlang meetup next month
CA Bay Area (and nearby) conlang meetup next month
(39 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Carmina Burana (was help with medieval Latin)
Carmina Burana (was help with medieval Latin)
(178 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Carmina Burana (was help with medieval Latin)
(39 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Characters: What are they?
Characters: What are they?
(102 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Characters: What are they?
(72 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Characters: What are they?
(83 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Characters: What are they?
(111 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
ConScripts
Re: ConScripts
(131 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ConScripts
(52 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ConScripts
(153 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: ConScripts
(49 lines)
From:
Harold Ensle <
[log in to unmask]
>
CXS (was: Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?)
CXS (was: Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?)
(42 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
CXS (was: Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?)
(36 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CXS (was: Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?)
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ethiopia et al. (was NATLANGS: What's that writing system?)
Re: Ethiopia et al. (was NATLANGS: What's that writing system?)
(73 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ethiopia et al. (was NATLANGS: What's that writing system?)
(83 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ethiopia et al. (was NATLANGS: What's that writing system?)
(81 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fluency in conlangs (was Re: Megdevi Book (...))
Fluency in conlangs (was Re: Megdevi Book (...))
(42 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fw: Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
Fw: Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
(65 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fw: Power of the Word
Fw: Power of the Word
(54 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fw: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
Fw: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(57 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
Fwd: Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(42 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gnomic vs eternal; also, telic vs atelic. (was: Re: Anti-telic?)
Gnomic vs eternal; also, telic vs atelic. (was: Re: Anti-telic?)
(118 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hilarious lexicon entry...
Re: Hilarious lexicon entry...
(60 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hilarious lexicon entry...
(41 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
Re: Introduction and sandhi scripting question.
(58 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Invitation to new 'conlang' wiki
Invitation to new 'conlang' wiki
(62 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invitation to new 'conlang' wiki
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invitation to new 'conlang' wiki
(46 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invitation to new 'conlang' wiki
(61 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invitation to new 'conlang' wiki
(56 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invitation to new 'conlang' wiki
(109 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invitation to new 'conlang' wiki
(96 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invitation to new 'conlang' wiki
(54 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Invitation to new 'conlang' wiki
(64 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Jovian phonological changes (WAS: Re: Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua)
Jovian phonological changes (WAS: Re: Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua)
(39 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
medieval Latin translation help needed
medieval Latin translation help needed
(83 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: medieval Latin translation help needed
(154 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: medieval Latin translation help needed
(157 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: medieval Latin translation help needed
(57 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: medieval Latin translation help needed
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
medieval Latin translation help needed/ Re: Carmina Burana (was help with medieval Latin)
Re: medieval Latin translation help needed/ Re: Carmina Burana (was help with medieval Latin)
(99 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: medieval Latin translation help needed/ Re: Carmina Burana (was help with medieval Latin)
(118 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
(54 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
(47 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
(48 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
(52 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
(61 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
(69 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
(52 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
(51 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
(117 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Megdevi Book (was Re: What is it we are saying in our languages?)
(71 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Music-conlangs & music
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(88 lines)
From:
Aaron Morse <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Music-conlangs & music
(268 lines)
From:
Jackson Moore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Musical language phonology
Musical language phonology
(47 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical language phonology
(43 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(42 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(49 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(46 lines)
From:
Paul Joseph Schleitwiler, FCM <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(66 lines)
From:
Paul Schleitwiler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(103 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: NATLANGS: What's that writing system?
(36 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Musical/Tonal Language: Nibuzigu
New Musical/Tonal Language: Nibuzigu
(45 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Musical/Tonal Language: Nibuzigu
(51 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Musical/Tonal Language: Nibuzigu
(75 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Musical/Tonal Language: Nibuzigu
(41 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
NLF2DWS example (not mine)
NLF2DWS example (not mine)
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
none
Re: none
(45 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: none
(50 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: none
(41 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Onset/Rhyme Scripts
Onset/Rhyme Scripts
(39 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Onset/Rhyme Scripts
(57 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Onset/Rhyme Scripts
(84 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: No rants! (USAGE: di"f"thong)
OT: Re: No rants! (USAGE: di"f"thong)
(127 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: THEORY Fusion Grammar
OT: THEORY Fusion Grammar
(135 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: THEORY Fusion Grammar
(54 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: THEORY Fusion Grammar
(66 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: THEORY Fusion Grammar
(130 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: THEORY Fusion Grammar
(44 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Reinventing NATLANGs
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(63 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(94 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(45 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(41 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(91 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(69 lines)
From:
Christian Köttl <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(49 lines)
From:
Paul Joseph Schleitwiler, FCM <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(32 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(32 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(43 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(932 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(139 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(60 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(94 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(227 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(61 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(45 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(207 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(50 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(62 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
resend? Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
resend? Re: Reinventing NATLANGs
(293 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Samhain (was Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago")
Samhain (was Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago")
(47 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Samhain (was Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago")
(165 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Samhain (was Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago")
(36 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Samhain (was Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago")
(49 lines)
From:
Joseph B. <
[log in to unmask]
>
SKETCH: A conlang based on music (was: Music-conlangs & music)
Re: SKETCH: A conlang based on music (was: Music-conlangs & music)
(50 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Takiyyudin phonology
Takiyyudin phonology
(72 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Takiyyudin phonology
(68 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Takiyyudin phonology
(108 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Takiyyudin phonology
(85 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Takiyyudin phonology
(79 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Takiyyudin phonology
(82 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Takiyyudin phonology
(48 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Takiyyudin phonology
(57 lines)
From:
Shreyas Sampat <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Takiyyudin phonology
(81 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: "searching" for fontmakers, etc.
TECH: "searching" for fontmakers, etc.
(67 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: another dumb question
Re: TECH: another dumb question
(37 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: another dumb question
(47 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Déja Vu Mono (was: Re: <No subject given>)
TECH: Déja Vu Mono (was: Re: <No subject given>)
(43 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Language Detection
Re: TECH: Language Detection
(57 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tenses -- any comments?
Tenses -- any comments?
(25 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tenses -- any comments?
(41 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tenses -- any comments?
(47 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Laxness?
THEORY: Laxness?
(59 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Laxness?
(64 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(39 lines)
From:
Damien Perrotin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(50 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(34 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(66 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(52 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(47 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(57 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(60 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(47 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(57 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(39 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(58 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(132 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(46 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(47 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(58 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(58 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(87 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(96 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(102 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(75 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(75 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(46 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(57 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(61 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(51 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(45 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(52 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(36 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(40 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(44 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(46 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(57 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(64 lines)
From:
Cian Ross <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(53 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(45 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(62 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(77 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(135 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(52 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(67 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(66 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(82 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(64 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(47 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Fiat lingua
(40 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Unknown pronoun
Unknown pronoun
(91 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown pronoun
(59 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Unknown pronoun
(82 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: "anthropomorphic"
USAGE: "anthropomorphic"
(39 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "anthropomorphic"
(43 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "anthropomorphic"
(61 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "anthropomorphic"
(76 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "anthropomorphic"
(63 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "anthropomorphic"
(50 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "anthropomorphic"
(59 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "anthropomorphic"
(76 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "anthropomorphic"
(48 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "anthropomorphic"
(36 lines)
From:
Joseph B. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "anthropomorphic"
(117 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(48 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(39 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(47 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(36 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(70 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(80 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(37 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(88 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(42 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(75 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(46 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(40 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(81 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(47 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(47 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(46 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(49 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(75 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(75 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(89 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(81 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(54 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(65 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(56 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(114 lines)
From:
Damien Perrotin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(52 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(45 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "I want crazy two years ago"
(46 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Other Note more on topic - Inuit jargon?
USAGE: Other Note more on topic - Inuit jargon?
(102 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Other Note more on topic - Inuit jargon?
(84 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vowel Harmony in Proto-Thagojian
Vowel Harmony in Proto-Thagojian
(71 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vowel height harmony (fuit Takiyyudin phonology)
Re: Vowel height harmony (fuit Takiyyudin phonology)
(81 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Whatever
Whatever
(23 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whatever
(60 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whatever
(65 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whatever
(38 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Whatever
(37 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Whats that Writing System?
Whats that Writing System?
(122 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(46 lines)
From:
Christian Thalmann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(52 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(1134 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(126 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(95 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(121 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(114 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(158 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(150 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(141 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(56 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(89 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(63 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(129 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(173 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAEPT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(101 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAESRT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
Re: YAESRT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(79 lines)
From:
Tristan Alexander McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAESRT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAESRT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: YAESRT: Enuf is Enuf: Some Peepl Thru with Dificult Spelingz
(83 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Conlangs-Conf] 2nd Language Creation Conference - current state of planning, talks, & some feedback request
[Conlangs-Conf] 2nd Language Creation Conference - current state of planning, talks, & some feedback request
(258 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(190 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(136 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(40 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(64 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(72 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(77 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(89 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(49 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(68 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [OT] Books for sanskrit self-study
(198 lines)
From:
Michael Adams <
[log in to unmask]
>
[p]>[m]?
[p]>[m]?
(36 lines)
From:
Joseph B. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p]>[m]?
(59 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p]>[m]?
(60 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p]>[m]?
(51 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [p]>[m]?
(53 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU