Conlang
Mailing List September 2006, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"gender" systems = vowel harmony coalescing with stress changes?
1st lesson in Gaajan (wsd: Re: Weekly Vocab #1.1.3 (repost #1))
Accusative or not accusative; that is the question
(7 messages)
Alveopalatals (fuit: Re: Dominus (Was: Re: Werewolf))
Athena(i) Re: Transcription exercise
(7 messages)
Book on constructive linguistics
(2 messages)
Difficult language ideas
(6 messages)
Disfluency and repair mechanisms
(4 messages)
Dominus (Was: Re: Werewolf)
Double verbs and topic marking
FW: Call for papers on Vantage Theory on LINGUIST list
Fwd: Transcription exercise
(2 messages)
Gmane
(2 messages)
Laturslav (was: Hello! - introduction)
lykanthropos
OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
(12 messages)
Palatal harmony ( was: Transcription exercise)
PIE Accent (was Re: Stress placement systems)
Romance miscellanea (was: Werewolf)
Should we have a relay-queue?
Stress placement systems
(4 messages)
Tamang tones
The biggest number you know in your conlang
(12 messages)
THEORY: Ergative, word order, and predicates
(3 messages)
Transcription exercise
(10 messages)
Translation challenge
(5 messages)
Trigger Systems (was Re: Book on constructive linguistics)
(3 messages)
Weekly Vocab #1.1.4 (repost #1)
(6 messages)
Weekly Vocab #5.3 (original)
Werewolf
(3 messages)
Zipfs Law may be a statistical artifact
(3 messages)
[OT] Long Tail
"gender" systems = vowel harmony coalescing with stress changes?
Re: "gender" systems = vowel harmony coalescing with stress changes?
(71 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
1st lesson in Gaajan (wsd: Re: Weekly Vocab #1.1.3 (repost #1))
Re: 1st lesson in Gaajan (wsd: Re: Weekly Vocab #1.1.3 (repost #1))
(64 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Accusative or not accusative; that is the question
Accusative or not accusative; that is the question
(170 lines)
From:
Santiago Matías Feldman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Accusative or not accusative; that is the question
(72 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Accusative or not accusative; that is the question
(76 lines)
From:
Kalle Bergman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Accusative or not accusative; that is the question
(87 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Accusative or not accusative; that is the question
(55 lines)
From:
Santiago Matías Feldman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Accusative or not accusative; that is the question
(171 lines)
From:
Santiago Matías Feldman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Accusative or not accusative; that is the question
(79 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Alveopalatals (fuit: Re: Dominus (Was: Re: Werewolf))
Alveopalatals (fuit: Re: Dominus (Was: Re: Werewolf))
(71 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Athena(i) Re: Transcription exercise
Athena(i) Re: Transcription exercise
(113 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Athena(i) Re: Transcription exercise
(165 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Athena(i) Re: Transcription exercise
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Athena(i) Re: Transcription exercise
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Athena(i) Re: Transcription exercise
(86 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Athena(i) Re: Transcription exercise
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Athena(i) Re: Transcription exercise
(63 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Book on constructive linguistics
Book on constructive linguistics
(66 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Book on constructive linguistics
(65 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Difficult language ideas
Re: Difficult language ideas
(51 lines)
From:
Leigh Richards <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Difficult language ideas
(127 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Difficult language ideas
(240 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Difficult language ideas
(42 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Difficult language ideas
(45 lines)
From:
Christopher Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Difficult language ideas
(54 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Disfluency and repair mechanisms
Disfluency and repair mechanisms
(65 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Disfluency and repair mechanisms
(57 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Disfluency and repair mechanisms
(60 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Disfluency and repair mechanisms
(180 lines)
From:
Doug Barr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Dominus (Was: Re: Werewolf)
Re: Dominus (Was: Re: Werewolf)
(103 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Double verbs and topic marking
Double verbs and topic marking
(69 lines)
From:
Kalle Bergman <
[log in to unmask]
>
FW: Call for papers on Vantage Theory on LINGUIST list
FW: Call for papers on Vantage Theory on LINGUIST list
(157 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Transcription exercise
Fwd: Transcription exercise
(44 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Fwd: Transcription exercise
(31 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gmane
Re: Gmane
(52 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gmane
(80 lines)
From:
Philippe Debar <
[log in to unmask]
>
Laturslav (was: Hello! - introduction)
Re: Laturslav (was: Hello! - introduction)
(73 lines)
From:
Santiago Matías Feldman <
[log in to unmask]
>
lykanthropos
Re: lykanthropos
(54 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
(50 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
(55 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
(36 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
(26 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
(169 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
(31 lines)
From:
Kalle Bergman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
(163 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
(38 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
(41 lines)
From:
Keith Gaughan <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
(54 lines)
From:
Kalle Bergman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
(74 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Dictionaries: why two sections??
(76 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Palatal harmony ( was: Transcription exercise)
Re: Palatal harmony ( was: Transcription exercise)
(182 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
PIE Accent (was Re: Stress placement systems)
PIE Accent (was Re: Stress placement systems)
(69 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Romance miscellanea (was: Werewolf)
Romance miscellanea (was: Werewolf)
(174 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Should we have a relay-queue?
Should we have a relay-queue?
(54 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Stress placement systems
Re: Stress placement systems
(85 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress placement systems
(42 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress placement systems
(126 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress placement systems
(102 lines)
From:
Rob Haden <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tamang tones
Tamang tones
(38 lines)
From:
Kate <
[log in to unmask]
>
The biggest number you know in your conlang
Re: The biggest number you know in your conlang
(41 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The biggest number you know in your conlang
(36 lines)
From:
Christopher Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The biggest number you know in your conlang
(65 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The biggest number you know in your conlang
(57 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The biggest number you know in your conlang
(43 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The biggest number you know in your conlang
(65 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The biggest number you know in your conlang
(41 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The biggest number you know in your conlang
(54 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The biggest number you know in your conlang
(92 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The biggest number you know in your conlang
(79 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The biggest number you know in your conlang
(41 lines)
From:
Dennis Paul Himes <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The biggest number you know in your conlang
(52 lines)
From:
scott <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Ergative, word order, and predicates
THEORY: Ergative, word order, and predicates
(46 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Ergative, word order, and predicates
(137 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Ergative, word order, and predicates
(55 lines)
From:
Christopher Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Transcription exercise
Re: Transcription exercise
(104 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Transcription exercise
(55 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Transcription exercise
(54 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Transcription exercise
(57 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Transcription exercise
(51 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Transcription exercise
(41 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Transcription exercise
(38 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Transcription exercise
(162 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Transcription exercise
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Transcription exercise
(60 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation challenge
Translation challenge
(62 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge
(137 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge
(37 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge
(69 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge
(69 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Trigger Systems (was Re: Book on constructive linguistics)
Trigger Systems (was Re: Book on constructive linguistics)
(107 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger Systems (was Re: Book on constructive linguistics)
(75 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Trigger Systems (was Re: Book on constructive linguistics)
(87 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab #1.1.4 (repost #1)
Weekly Vocab #1.1.4 (repost #1)
(89 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.1.4 (repost #1)
(104 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.1.4 (repost #1)
(151 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.1.4 (repost #1)
(79 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.1.4 (repost #1)
(62 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.1.4 (repost #1)
(59 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab #5.3 (original)
Re: Weekly Vocab #5.3 (original)
(58 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Werewolf
Re: Werewolf
(185 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Werewolf
(48 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Werewolf
(62 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Zipfs Law may be a statistical artifact
Zipfs Law may be a statistical artifact
(41 lines)
From:
John Chalmers <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Zipfs Law may be a statistical artifact
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Zipfs Law may be a statistical artifact
(97 lines)
From:
Yahya Abdal-Aziz <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Long Tail
[OT] Long Tail
(71 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU