Conlang Mailing List – November 2006, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• (somewhat) New page on my website!!
• 32 related conlangs by 6 unique authors (4 messages)
• A Language built around a novel grammar (15 messages)
• a request for advice (2 messages)
• Another Essentialist Explanation (14 messages)
• Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck? (10 messages)
• Connglish (27 messages)
• Diachronic conlanging (3 messages)
• Diachronic conlanging; linguistics forums
• Hour of Babble podcast (4 messages)
• New Idea for Langmaker Entries
• OT catachist etc (was: Connglish)
• OT: Diachronic conlanging; linguistics forums (2 messages)
• Some help concerning making own fonts and alphabet
• Weekly Vocab #1.1.10 (repost #1)
• Weekly Vocab #1.2.1 (repost #1)
• Weekly Vocab #1.2.2 (repost #1)
• [LCS] Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

1. (somewhat) New page on my website!!
   • Re: (somewhat) New page on my website!! (37 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

2. 32 related conlangs by 6 unique authors
   • 32 related conlangs by 6 unique authors (39 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 32 related conlangs by 6 unique authors (65 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 32 related conlangs by 6 unique authors (67 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 32 related conlangs by 6 unique authors (84 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

3. A Language built around a novel grammar
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (102 lines)
     From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (86 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (45 lines)
     From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (52 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (97 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (154 lines)
     From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (64 lines)
     From: Kinetic <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (63 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (39 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (72 lines)
     From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (101 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (55 lines)
     From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (58 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (72 lines)
     From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A Language built around a novel grammar (35 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

4. a request for advice
   • Re: a request for advice (51 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: a request for advice (61 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

5. Another Essentialist Explanation
   • Another Essentialist Explanation (51 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Essentialist Explanation (25 lines)
     From: John Quijada <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Essentialist Explanation (42 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Essentialist Explanation (61 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Essentialist Explanation (32 lines)
     From: Harald S. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Essentialist Explanation (42 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Essentialist Explanation (24 lines)
     From: Weld S Carter, Jr. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Essentialist Explanation (34 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Essentialist Explanation (48 lines)
     From: daniel prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Essentialist Explanation (75 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Essentialist Explanation (28 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Another Essentialist Explanation (39 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Essentialist Explanation (50 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Essentialist Explanation (50 lines)
     From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>

6. Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
   • Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck? (47 lines)
     From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck? (105 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck? (70 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck? (78 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck? (53 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck? (41 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck? (43 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck? (73 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck? (70 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck? (87 lines)
     From: Mark Reed <[log in to unmask]>

7. Connglish
   • Connglish (42 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (45 lines)
     From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (49 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (87 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (51 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (51 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (67 lines)
     From: daniel prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (47 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (42 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (88 lines)
     From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (56 lines)
     From: Sally Caves <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (49 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (61 lines)
     From: Sylvia Sotomayor <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (48 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (45 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (40 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (139 lines)
     From: Dan Sulani <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (68 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (49 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (46 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (38 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (42 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (115 lines)
     From: Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (80 lines)
     From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (103 lines)
     From: Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (51 lines)
     From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Connglish (92 lines)
     From: Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <[log in to unmask]>

8. Diachronic conlanging
   • Re: Diachronic conlanging (69 lines)
     From: Mark Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Diachronic conlanging (57 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Diachronic conlanging (67 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

9. Diachronic conlanging; linguistics forums
   • Re: Diachronic conlanging; linguistics forums (25 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

10. Hour of Babble podcast
    • Hour of Babble podcast (31 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hour of Babble podcast (39 lines)
      From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hour of Babble podcast (25 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Hour of Babble podcast (32 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

11. New Idea for Langmaker Entries
    • New Idea for Langmaker Entries (55 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

12. OT catachist etc (was: Connglish)
    • OT catachist etc (was: Connglish) (88 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

13. OT: Diachronic conlanging; linguistics forums
    • OT: Diachronic conlanging; linguistics forums (55 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • OT: Diachronic conlanging; linguistics forums (57 lines)
      From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>

14. Some help concerning making own fonts and alphabet
    • Re: Some help concerning making own fonts and alphabet (36 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

15. Weekly Vocab #1.1.10 (repost #1)
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #1.1.10 (repost #1) (197 lines)
      From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>

16. Weekly Vocab #1.2.1 (repost #1)
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #1.2.1 (repost #1) (159 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

17. Weekly Vocab #1.2.2 (repost #1)
    • Weekly Vocab #1.2.2 (repost #1) (102 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

18. [LCS] Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
    • [LCS] Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws (61 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>