Conlang
Mailing List – November 2006, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
(In)Definiteness
(3 messages)
A Language built around a novel grammar
(9 messages)
Another Essentialist Explanation
(3 messages)
Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(18 messages)
Diachronic conlanging
(3 messages)
Help on Sound Changes
(6 messages)
Klingon vs. Tengwar - UserFriendly
(11 messages)
National Language (from Re: connlang thread)
(3 messages)
ODIL: An attempt at defining language efficiency
OT catachist etc (was: Connglish)
OT: PAYPAL and HTML mails
OT: Phishing & countermeasures - hacker's perspective (WAS: OT: Does Paypal completely suck)
(3 messages)
OT: Printing Help
(4 messages)
OT: seeking Faroese dictionary
Phonology drift
(6 messages)
Printing Help
(2 messages)
Prosody as syntactic marker (was Re: A Language built around a novel grammar)
Purpose of this list?
(3 messages)
TECH: Re: Printing Help
Test, please ignore
(3 messages)
Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(16 messages)
USAGE: "privilege" as "permission"
(4 messages)
USAGE: The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
(7 messages)
Weekly Vocab #1.2.2 (repost #1)
Weekly Vocab #1.2.3 (repost #1)
(5 messages)
[LCC] Conlang comedy act wanted
(In)Definiteness
(In)Definiteness
(133 lines)
From:
Remi Villatel <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: (In)Definiteness
(71 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: (In)Definiteness
(64 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
A Language built around a novel grammar
Re: A Language built around a novel grammar
(75 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Language built around a novel grammar
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Language built around a novel grammar
(73 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Language built around a novel grammar
(57 lines)
From:
Harold Ensle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Language built around a novel grammar
(115 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Language built around a novel grammar
(37 lines)
From:
Harold Ensle <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Language built around a novel grammar
(137 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Language built around a novel grammar
(97 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: A Language built around a novel grammar
(103 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another Essentialist Explanation
Re: Another Essentialist Explanation
(62 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another Essentialist Explanation
(53 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another Essentialist Explanation
(59 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(21 lines)
From:
Weld S Carter, Jr. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(61 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(111 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(56 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(63 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(61 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(109 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(37 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(80 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(78 lines)
From:
Sally Caves <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(42 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(85 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(122 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(48 lines)
From:
Kate <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(88 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Completely OT: PAYPAL does it suck?
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Diachronic conlanging
Re: Diachronic conlanging
(47 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Diachronic conlanging
(58 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Diachronic conlanging
(81 lines)
From:
BP Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Help on Sound Changes
Help on Sound Changes
(65 lines)
From:
Santiago Matías Feldman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help on Sound Changes
(81 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help on Sound Changes
(53 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help on Sound Changes
(151 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help on Sound Changes
(137 lines)
From:
Santiago Matías Feldman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Help on Sound Changes
(56 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Klingon vs. Tengwar - UserFriendly
Klingon vs. Tengwar - UserFriendly
(26 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon vs. Tengwar - UserFriendly
(45 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon vs. Tengwar - UserFriendly
(75 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon vs. Tengwar - UserFriendly
(58 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon vs. Tengwar - UserFriendly
(72 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon vs. Tengwar - UserFriendly
(59 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon vs. Tengwar - UserFriendly
(30 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon vs. Tengwar - UserFriendly
(54 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon vs. Tengwar - UserFriendly
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon vs. Tengwar - UserFriendly
(64 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Klingon vs. Tengwar - UserFriendly
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
National Language (from Re: connlang thread)
Re: National Language (from Re: connlang thread)
(36 lines)
From:
KB <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: National Language (from Re: connlang thread)
(36 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: National Language (from Re: connlang thread)
(47 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
ODIL: An attempt at defining language efficiency
ODIL: An attempt at defining language efficiency
(77 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT catachist etc (was: Connglish)
Re: OT catachist etc (was: Connglish)
(37 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: PAYPAL and HTML mails
OT: PAYPAL and HTML mails
(52 lines)
From:
Piermaria Maraziti <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Phishing & countermeasures - hacker's perspective (WAS: OT: Does Paypal completely suck)
OT: Phishing & countermeasures - hacker's perspective (WAS: OT: Does Paypal completely suck)
(33 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Phishing & countermeasures - hacker's perspective (WAS: OT: Does Paypal completely suck)
(36 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Phishing & countermeasures - hacker's perspective (WAS: OT: Does Paypal completely suck)
(34 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Printing Help
OT: Printing Help
(73 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Printing Help
(85 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Printing Help
(56 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Printing Help
(93 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: seeking Faroese dictionary
OT: seeking Faroese dictionary
(29 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonology drift
Phonology drift
(119 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology drift
(59 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology drift
(65 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology drift
(65 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology drift
(68 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology drift
(95 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Printing Help
Re: Printing Help
(66 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Printing Help
(98 lines)
From:
Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <
[log in to unmask]
>
Prosody as syntactic marker (was Re: A Language built around a novel grammar)
Prosody as syntactic marker (was Re: A Language built around a novel grammar)
(61 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Purpose of this list?
Purpose of this list?
(35 lines)
From:
Arne Duering <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Purpose of this list?
(45 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Purpose of this list?
(66 lines)
From:
Arne Duering <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Re: Printing Help
TECH: Re: Printing Help
(117 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Test, please ignore
Test, please ignore
(36 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Test, please ignore
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Test, please ignore
(85 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(30 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(29 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(39 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(50 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(46 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(36 lines)
From:
Pafu Bothi <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(55 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(46 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(66 lines)
From:
Arne Duering <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(40 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(70 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(40 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(77 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(85 lines)
From:
Mark Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: "privilege" as "permission"
USAGE: "privilege" as "permission"
(71 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "privilege" as "permission"
(74 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "privilege" as "permission"
(100 lines)
From:
Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: "privilege" as "permission"
(48 lines)
From:
KB <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
USAGE: The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
(34 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
(47 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
(37 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
(52 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
(43 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab #1.2.2 (repost #1)
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.2.2 (repost #1)
(150 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab #1.2.3 (repost #1)
Weekly Vocab #1.2.3 (repost #1)
(109 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.2.3 (repost #1)
(295 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.2.3 (repost #1)
(40 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.2.3 (repost #1)
(119 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.2.3 (repost #1)
(133 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
[LCC] Conlang comedy act wanted
[LCC] Conlang comedy act wanted
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – November 2006, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – November 2006, week 4
