Conlang
Mailing List December 2006, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
(12 messages)
CA Bay Area Meetup
Cheap access to electronic books
(2 messages)
Clear the Table
(5 messages)
Conlang Design Patterns?
(3 messages)
Diachronic linguistics readings
(2 messages)
Lojban in XKCD
More sentences for Conlang testing
Name for vowels
(5 messages)
Non-Human Phonology
(2 messages)
Non-verbal writing.
(5 messages)
OT catachist etc
OT CHAT Re: Non-Human Phonology
(3 messages)
OT: Re: Non-Human Phonology
Phonology drift
Project Pi
Regimonti Babel Text
(8 messages)
Relay 14
(9 messages)
Short random brain dump on possesives
(2 messages)
Simple sentences and how difficult they can be.
(5 messages)
sociolinguistics project help
(4 messages)
strong verbs in French?
(7 messages)
TECH: help, special characters (follow-up)
(2 messages)
Thagojian 3B notes
(7 messages)
The Oligosynthesis Project
(4 messages)
THEORY: Denasalization
(3 messages)
Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(3 messages)
Two part verbs (Why They Shouldn't Make Me Wait)
(8 messages)
USAGE: Latin for "uncaring"
Vowel inventory (was Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?)
Weekly Vocab #1.2.5 (repost #1)
(3 messages)
Weekly Vocab #1.2.6 (repost #1)
What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(17 messages)
[-SPAM-] Re: OT catachist etc
[-SPAM-] USAGE: Latin for "uncaring"
(2 messages)
Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
(54 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
(49 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
(53 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
(48 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
(56 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
(67 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
(74 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
(46 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
(64 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
(40 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beta 2: Conlang Archives Mirror
(51 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
CA Bay Area Meetup
CA Bay Area Meetup
(49 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cheap access to electronic books
Re: Cheap access to electronic books
(45 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cheap access to electronic books
(51 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Clear the Table
Clear the Table
(60 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Clear the Table
(75 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Clear the Table
(75 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Clear the Table
(80 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Clear the Table
(33 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Design Patterns?
Conlang Design Patterns?
(130 lines)
From:
Caleb Hines <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Design Patterns?
(156 lines)
From:
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Design Patterns?
(39 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Diachronic linguistics readings
Re: Diachronic linguistics readings
(44 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Diachronic linguistics readings
(67 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lojban in XKCD
Lojban in XKCD
(28 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
More sentences for Conlang testing
More sentences for Conlang testing
(40 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Name for vowels
Name for vowels
(33 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name for vowels
(41 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name for vowels
(48 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name for vowels
(48 lines)
From:
Steven Williams <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Name for vowels
(47 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-Human Phonology
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(44 lines)
From:
Simon Clarkstone <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-Human Phonology
(58 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Non-verbal writing.
Non-verbal writing.
(32 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-verbal writing.
(48 lines)
From:
Kate <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-verbal writing.
(37 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-verbal writing.
(66 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Non-verbal writing.
(50 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT catachist etc
Re: OT catachist etc
(52 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT CHAT Re: Non-Human Phonology
OT CHAT Re: Non-Human Phonology
(76 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT CHAT Re: Non-Human Phonology
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT CHAT Re: Non-Human Phonology
(51 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Non-Human Phonology
OT: Re: Non-Human Phonology
(52 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonology drift
Re: Phonology drift
(132 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Project Pi
Project Pi
(25 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Regimonti Babel Text
Regimonti Babel Text
(32 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regimonti Babel Text
(36 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regimonti Babel Text
(56 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regimonti Babel Text
(45 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regimonti Babel Text
(66 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regimonti Babel Text
(74 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regimonti Babel Text
(65 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Regimonti Babel Text
(64 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Relay 14
Relay 14
(40 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay 14
(32 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay 14
(34 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay 14
(53 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay 14
(32 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay 14
(53 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay 14
(38 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay 14
(57 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Relay 14
(33 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
<
[log in to unmask]
>
Short random brain dump on possesives
Short random brain dump on possesives
(41 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Short random brain dump on possesives
(54 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Simple sentences and how difficult they can be.
Simple sentences and how difficult they can be.
(80 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Simple sentences and how difficult they can be.
(90 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Simple sentences and how difficult they can be.
(125 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Simple sentences and how difficult they can be.
(84 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Simple sentences and how difficult they can be.
(100 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
sociolinguistics project help
Re: sociolinguistics project help
(66 lines)
From:
wayne chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sociolinguistics project help
(105 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sociolinguistics project help
(89 lines)
From:
Sylvia Sotomayor <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sociolinguistics project help
(81 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
strong verbs in French?
strong verbs in French?
(37 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strong verbs in French?
(50 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strong verbs in French?
(62 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strong verbs in French?
(46 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strong verbs in French?
(54 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strong verbs in French?
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: strong verbs in French?
(38 lines)
From:
Kinetic <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: help, special characters (follow-up)
Re: TECH: help, special characters (follow-up)
(63 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: help, special characters (follow-up)
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Thagojian 3B notes
Thagojian 3B notes
(124 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian 3B notes
(76 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian 3B notes
(129 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian 3B notes
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian 3B notes
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian 3B notes
(46 lines)
From:
Isaac Penzev <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Thagojian 3B notes
(67 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Oligosynthesis Project
The Oligosynthesis Project
(34 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Oligosynthesis Project
(54 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: The Oligosynthesis Project
(33 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Oligosynthesis Project
(31 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Denasalization
THEORY: Denasalization
(80 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Denasalization
(65 lines)
From:
Patrick Littell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Denasalization
(66 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(57 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(51 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Translation challenge: Would you go out with me?
(41 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Two part verbs (Why They Shouldn't Make Me Wait)
Two part verbs (Why They Shouldn't Make Me Wait)
(51 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two part verbs (Why They Shouldn't Make Me Wait)
(58 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two part verbs (Why They Shouldn't Make Me Wait)
(50 lines)
From:
Jonathan Knibb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two part verbs (Why They Shouldn't Make Me Wait)
(68 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two part verbs (Why They Shouldn't Make Me Wait)
(87 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two part verbs (Why They Shouldn't Make Me Wait)
(46 lines)
From:
Christopher Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two part verbs (Why They Shouldn't Make Me Wait)
(116 lines)
From:
Christopher Bates <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Two part verbs (Why They Shouldn't Make Me Wait)
(67 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Latin for "uncaring"
USAGE: Latin for "uncaring"
(32 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vowel inventory (was Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?)
Re: Vowel inventory (was Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?)
(49 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab #1.2.5 (repost #1)
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.2.5 (repost #1)
(113 lines)
From:
Pieterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.2.5 (repost #1)
(132 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.2.5 (repost #1)
(200 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab #1.2.6 (repost #1)
Weekly Vocab #1.2.6 (repost #1)
(82 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(45 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(74 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(77 lines)
From:
Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(73 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(106 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(74 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(94 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(78 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(61 lines)
From:
daniel prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(59 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(53 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(66 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(55 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(97 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(69 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(153 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: What criteria do you have for your own or others' languages?
(54 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
[-SPAM-] Re: OT catachist etc
Re: [-SPAM-] Re: OT catachist etc
(66 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
[-SPAM-] USAGE: Latin for "uncaring"
Re: [-SPAM-] USAGE: Latin for "uncaring"
(43 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [-SPAM-] USAGE: Latin for "uncaring"
(50 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU