Conlang Mailing List – January 2007, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (17 messages)
• Azurian. (4 messages)
• Can realism be retro-fitted? (21 messages)
• CHAT: Russian et alia (was: YARPT)
• Deriving vowel harmony diachronically (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?) (3 messages)
• diachronic change wiki (3 messages)
• DOH!!! (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?)
• first person plural (5 messages)
• first post (3 messages)
• Further digression (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?) (4 messages)
• Glossotechnia, the card game (8 messages)
• How you pronunce foreign place names (14 messages)
• How you render foreign place names in your conlangs (<: How you pronunce foreign place names) (4 messages)
• Idea: diachronic change wiki (3 messages)
• Inspirational languages (14 messages)
• Labiovelars (was Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode)
• Lugdunum > Lyon? (2 messages)
• New language Thisbo (4 messages)
• Old Sanhr Pronominology
• OT: Translation experiment - English, German, and/or Japanese speakers needed
• pinyin proposal (2 messages)
• Pinyin troubles: (was Re: Further digression) (4 messages)
• Questions (mostly about phonemics) (19 messages)
• Rare phonemes (was Re: Using word generators) (7 messages)
• Sound Change /bs/ > /f/ ? (4 messages)
• The Art of Language (Issue 02) (2 messages)
• to be different (17 messages)
• Trills (was: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode) (3 messages)
• Weekly Vocab #2.1.3 (repost #1)
• Weekly Vocab #2.1.4 (repost #1) (2 messages)
• YAEPT: How you pronunce foreign place names (6 messages)
• YAEPT: STRUT (was: RFC: Renaming 3B to Tezenki) (3 messages)
• YARPT (Was: Re: YAEPT: STRUT (was: RFC: Renaming 3B to Tezenki)) (6 messages)
• YART (Was: Re: Inspirational languages) (4 messages)
• YASvPT Swedish prosody (was Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics))

1. "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode
   • "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (68 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (74 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (77 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (146 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (64 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (122 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (154 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (84 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (38 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (42 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (53 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (66 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (118 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (81 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (116 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (39 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode (44 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

2. Azurian.
   • Azurian. (35 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Azurian. (48 lines)
     From: JR <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Azurian. (38 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Azurian. (52 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

3. Can realism be retro-fitted?
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (154 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (51 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (56 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (119 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (101 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (37 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (61 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (42 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (48 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (55 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (64 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (62 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (53 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (65 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (57 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (382 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (42 lines)
     From: Adam Parrish <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (75 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (77 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (168 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Can realism be retro-fitted? (243 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

4. CHAT: Russian et alia (was: YARPT)
   • CHAT: Russian et alia (was: YARPT) (142 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

5. Deriving vowel harmony diachronically (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?)
   • Deriving vowel harmony diachronically (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?) (119 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Deriving vowel harmony diachronically (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?) (122 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Deriving vowel harmony diachronically (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?) (153 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

6. diachronic change wiki
   • Re: diachronic change wiki (39 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: diachronic change wiki (45 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: diachronic change wiki (72 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

7. DOH!!! (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?)
   • DOH!!! (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?) (42 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

8. first person plural
   • Re: first person plural (62 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: first person plural (59 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: first person plural (64 lines)
     From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: first person plural (90 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: first person plural (99 lines)
     From: Dennis Paul Himes <[log in to unmask]>

9. first post
   • first post (24 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: first post (35 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: first post (37 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

10. Further digression (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?)
    • Further digression (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?) (54 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Further digression (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?) (68 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Further digression (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?) (90 lines)
      From: Daniel Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Further digression (was Re: Can realism be retro-fitted?) (49 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>

11. Glossotechnia, the card game
    • Glossotechnia, the card game (147 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Glossotechnia, the card game (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Glossotechnia, the card game (81 lines)
      From: Chad Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Glossotechnia, the card game (87 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Glossotechnia, the card game (26 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Glossotechnia, the card game (52 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Glossotechnia, the card game (223 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Glossotechnia, the card game (155 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

12. How you pronunce foreign place names
    • How you pronunce foreign place names (54 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How you pronunce foreign place names (96 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How you pronunce foreign place names (75 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How you pronunce foreign place names (98 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: How you pronunce foreign place names (86 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How you pronunce foreign place names (53 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: How you pronunce foreign place names (63 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How you pronunce foreign place names (87 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How you pronunce foreign place names (49 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: How you pronunce foreign place names (38 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: How you pronunce foreign place names (98 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How you pronunce foreign place names (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: How you pronunce foreign place names (71 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How you pronunce foreign place names (43 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

13. How you render foreign place names in your conlangs (<: How you pronunce foreign place names)
    • How you render foreign place names in your conlangs (<: How you pronunce foreign place names) (73 lines)
      From: Deinx Nxtxr <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How you render foreign place names in your conlangs (<: How you pronunce foreign place names) (45 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: How you render foreign place names in your conlangs (<: How you pronunce foreign place names) (81 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: How you render foreign place names in your conlangs (<: How you pronunce foreign place names) (70 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]

14. Idea: diachronic change wiki
    • Idea: diachronic change wiki (45 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Idea: diachronic change wiki (55 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Idea: diachronic change wiki (65 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

15. Inspirational languages
    • Re: Inspirational languages (54 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Inspirational languages (79 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Inspirational languages (58 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Inspirational languages (108 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Inspirational languages (63 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Inspirational languages (33 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Inspirational languages (106 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Inspirational languages (36 lines)
      From: wayne chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Inspirational languages (51 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Inspirational languages (59 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Inspirational languages (41 lines)
      From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Inspirational languages (48 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Inspirational languages (45 lines)
      From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Inspirational languages (65 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

16. Labiovelars (was Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode)
    • Labiovelars (was Re: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode) (40 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

17. Lugdunum > Lyon?
    • Lugdunum > Lyon? (38 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Lugdunum > Lyon? (55 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

18. New language Thisbo
    • New language Thisbo (140 lines)
      From: Terrence Donnelly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New language Thisbo (102 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New language Thisbo (60 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New language Thisbo (160 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

19. Old Sanhr Pronominology
    • Old Sanhr Pronominology (249 lines)
      From: Peter Ara Guekguezian <[log in to unmask]>

20. OT: Translation experiment - English, German, and/or Japanese speakers needed
    • OT: Translation experiment - English, German, and/or Japanese speakers needed (49 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

21. pinyin proposal
    • pinyin proposal (37 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: pinyin proposal (102 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

22. Pinyin troubles: (was Re: Further digression)
    • Pinyin troubles: (was Re: Further digression) (40 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pinyin troubles: (was Re: Further digression) (41 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pinyin troubles: (was Re: Further digression) (57 lines)
      From: Leon Lin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pinyin troubles: (was Re: Further digression) (78 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

23. Questions (mostly about phonemics)
    • Questions (mostly about phonemics) (76 lines)
      From: Leon Lin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (35 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (179 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (87 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (80 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (50 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (137 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (127 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (43 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (48 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (39 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (57 lines)
      From: daniel prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (50 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (109 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (59 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (55 lines)
      From: Leon Lin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics) (85 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

24. Rare phonemes (was Re: Using word generators)
    • Rare phonemes (was Re: Using word generators) (56 lines)
      From: Jonathan Knibb <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rare phonemes (was Re: Using word generators) (52 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rare phonemes (was Re: Using word generators) (68 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rare phonemes (was Re: Using word generators) (65 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rare phonemes (was Re: Using word generators) (63 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rare phonemes (was Re: Using word generators) (54 lines)
      From: Steven Williams <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Rare phonemes (was Re: Using word generators) (73 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

25. Sound Change /bs/ > /f/ ?
    • Sound Change /bs/ > /f/ ? (68 lines)
      From: Santiago Matías Feldman <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change /bs/ > /f/ ? (52 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change /bs/ > /f/ ? (57 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sound Change /bs/ > /f/ ? (55 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

26. The Art of Language (Issue 02)
    • The Art of Language (Issue 02) (27 lines)
      From: Pablo Flores <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: The Art of Language (Issue 02) (55 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>

27. to be different
    • to be different (25 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (32 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (61 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (39 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: to be different (64 lines)
      From: Remi Villatel <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (55 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (42 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (70 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (62 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (51 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (46 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (61 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (67 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (46 lines)
      From: Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (63 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (41 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: to be different (66 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

28. Trills (was: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode)
    • Re: Trills (was: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode) (54 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Trills (was: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode) (65 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Trills (was: "Proposed IPA" characters not in Unicode) (54 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>

29. Weekly Vocab #2.1.3 (repost #1)
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.3 (repost #1) (133 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

30. Weekly Vocab #2.1.4 (repost #1)
    • Weekly Vocab #2.1.4 (repost #1) (92 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.4 (repost #1) (105 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

31. YAEPT: How you pronunce foreign place names
    • Re: YAEPT: How you pronunce foreign place names (60 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: How you pronunce foreign place names (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: How you pronunce foreign place names (67 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: How you pronunce foreign place names (35 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: How you pronunce foreign place names (53 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: How you pronunce foreign place names (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

32. YAEPT: STRUT (was: RFC: Renaming 3B to Tezenki)
    • Re: YAEPT: STRUT (was: RFC: Renaming 3B to Tezenki) (63 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: STRUT (was: RFC: Renaming 3B to Tezenki) (84 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: STRUT (was: RFC: Renaming 3B to Tezenki) (49 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

33. YARPT (Was: Re: YAEPT: STRUT (was: RFC: Renaming 3B to Tezenki))
    • YARPT (Was: Re: YAEPT: STRUT (was: RFC: Renaming 3B to Tezenki)) (124 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YARPT (Was: Re: YAEPT: STRUT (was: RFC: Renaming 3B to Tezenki)) (108 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YARPT (Was: Re: YAEPT: STRUT (was: RFC: Renaming 3B to Tezenki)) (82 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YARPT (Was: Re: YAEPT: STRUT (was: RFC: Renaming 3B to Tezenki)) (71 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YARPT (Was: Re: YAEPT: STRUT (was: RFC: Renaming 3B to Tezenki)) (219 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YARPT (Was: Re: YAEPT: STRUT (was: RFC: Renaming 3B to Tezenki)) (50 lines)
      From: Elyse M. Grasso <[log in to unmask]>

34. YART (Was: Re: Inspirational languages)
    • YART (Was: Re: Inspirational languages) (166 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YART (Was: Re: Inspirational languages) (159 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YART (Was: Re: Inspirational languages) (176 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YART (Was: Re: Inspirational languages) (110 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>

35. YASvPT Swedish prosody (was Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics))
    • YASvPT Swedish prosody (was Re: Questions (mostly about phonemics)) (121 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>