Conlang Mailing List – February 2007, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• (Separable) suffixes? (8 messages)
• A better way to show interlinears (12 messages)
• A conlang crossword puzzle
• A dialogue in Old Urianian. (6 messages)
• CHAT: C in Greek Alphabet (2 messages)
• CHAT: Re: This or that that. (4 messages)
• Frame-based vs ontology-based vocabulary (6 messages)
• Fwd: Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1)
• Gender as suffixaufnahme? (3 messages)
• Intro: Sah'heh, Megres, Saluton! (2 messages)
• isolating conlangs (12 messages)
• META: Another Unicode test
• OT: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) HELP!
• Some Sound Changes (3 messages)
• Tense on Nouns (13 messages)
• Terzemian on the web (13 messages)
• This or that that. (3 messages)
• Weekly Vocab #2.1.7 (repost #1)
• Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) (11 messages)
• What does "bakat sedan" mean? (6 messages)
• Why Consonants? (22 messages)
• Why consonants?
• Why Consonants?

1. (Separable) suffixes?
   • (Separable) suffixes? (46 lines)
     From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: (Separable) suffixes? (48 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: (Separable) suffixes? (45 lines)
     From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: (Separable) suffixes? (33 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: (Separable) suffixes? (35 lines)
     From: Damian Yerrick <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: (Separable) suffixes? (45 lines)
     From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: (Separable) suffixes? (36 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: (Separable) suffixes? (53 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

2. A better way to show interlinears
   • A better way to show interlinears (48 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A better way to show interlinears (46 lines)
     From: Leon Lin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A better way to show interlinears (32 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A better way to show interlinears (46 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A better way to show interlinears (51 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A better way to show interlinears (103 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A better way to show interlinears (49 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A better way to show interlinears (81 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A better way to show interlinears (79 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A better way to show interlinears (41 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A better way to show interlinears (31 lines)
     From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A better way to show interlinears (81 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

3. A conlang crossword puzzle
   • A conlang crossword puzzle (39 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

4. A dialogue in Old Urianian.
   • A dialogue in Old Urianian. (210 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A dialogue in Old Urianian. (225 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A dialogue in Old Urianian. (47 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A dialogue in Old Urianian. (71 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A dialogue in Old Urianian. (98 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: A dialogue in Old Urianian. (41 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

5. CHAT: C in Greek Alphabet
   • CHAT: C in Greek Alphabet (42 lines)
     From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: C in Greek Alphabet (69 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

6. CHAT: Re: This or that that.
   • Re: CHAT: Re: This or that that. (40 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: This or that that. (47 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: This or that that. (64 lines)
     From: Leon Lin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Re: This or that that. (55 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

7. Frame-based vs ontology-based vocabulary
   • Frame-based vs ontology-based vocabulary (174 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Frame-based vs ontology-based vocabulary (62 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Frame-based vs ontology-based vocabulary (36 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Frame-based vs ontology-based vocabulary (152 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Frame-based vs ontology-based vocabulary (38 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Frame-based vs ontology-based vocabulary (55 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

8. Fwd: Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1)
   • Fwd: Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) (54 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

9. Gender as suffixaufnahme?
   • Gender as suffixaufnahme? (47 lines)
     From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender as suffixaufnahme? (63 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Gender as suffixaufnahme? (83 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>

10. Intro: Sah'heh, Megres, Saluton!
    • Intro: Sah'heh, Megres, Saluton! (46 lines)
      From: Dave Rutan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Intro: Sah'heh, Megres, Saluton! (44 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

11. isolating conlangs
    • isolating conlangs (25 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: isolating conlangs (50 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: isolating conlangs (34 lines)
      From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: isolating conlangs (42 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: isolating conlangs (44 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: isolating conlangs (40 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: isolating conlangs (45 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: isolating conlangs (50 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: isolating conlangs (40 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: isolating conlangs (34 lines)
      From: Leon Lin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: isolating conlangs (50 lines)
      From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: isolating conlangs (57 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

12. META: Another Unicode test
    • Re: META: Another Unicode test (46 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

13. OT: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) HELP!
    • OT: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) HELP! (80 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

14. Some Sound Changes
    • Re: Some Sound Changes (133 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Some Sound Changes (145 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Some Sound Changes (117 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

15. Tense on Nouns
    • Tense on Nouns (50 lines)
      From: Brian B <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tense on Nouns (43 lines)
      From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tense on Nouns (77 lines)
      From: Edward Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tense on Nouns (62 lines)
      From: Aquamarine Demon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tense on Nouns (44 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tense on Nouns (24 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tense on Nouns (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Tense on Nouns (44 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tense on Nouns (25 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Tense on Nouns (35 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tense on Nouns (68 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tense on Nouns (104 lines)
      From: Brian B <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tense on Nouns (50 lines)
      From: Brian B <[log in to unmask]>

16. Terzemian on the web
    • Re: Terzemian on the web (110 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Terzemian on the web (42 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Terzemian on the web (128 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Terzemian on the web (308 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Terzemian on the web (91 lines)
      From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Terzemian on the web (153 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Terzemian on the web (71 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Terzemian on the web (68 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Terzemian on the web (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Terzemian on the web (64 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Terzemian on the web (67 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Terzemian on the web (64 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Terzemian on the web (70 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

17. This or that that.
    • Re: This or that that. (40 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: This or that that. (41 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: This or that that. (80 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

18. Weekly Vocab #2.1.7 (repost #1)
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.7 (repost #1) (103 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

19. Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1)
    • Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) (89 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) (70 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) (55 lines)
      From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) (94 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) (86 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) (49 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) (78 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) (45 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) (36 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) (43 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.8 (repost #1) (75 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

20. What does "bakat sedan" mean?
    • What does "bakat sedan" mean? (49 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What does "bakat sedan" mean? (43 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: What does "bakat sedan" mean? (52 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What does "bakat sedan" mean? (72 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What does "bakat sedan" mean? (67 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: What does "bakat sedan" mean? (58 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>

21. Why Consonants?
    • Why Consonants? (41 lines)
      From: Leon Lin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (45 lines)
      From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (100 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (76 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (103 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (53 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (98 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (71 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (51 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (105 lines)
      From: Aquamarine Demon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (62 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (113 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (51 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (124 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (36 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (47 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Why Consonants? (102 lines)
      From: Leon Lin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (93 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (58 lines)
      From: Aquamarine Demon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (53 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (60 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Why Consonants? (82 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

22. Why consonants?
    • Why consonants? (62 lines)
      From: Mark Jones <[log in to unmask]>

23. Why Consonants?
    • Re: Why Consonants? (65 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>