Conlang Mailing List -- April 2007, week 3

Conlang Mailing List – April 2007, week 3

Sort by

Author | Date | Topic
Chronologically | Most recent first

Options

Show author | Hide author
Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation

Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives

Attempt to reduce all verbs to a few roots
- Attempt to reduce all verbs to a few roots (162 lines)
  From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Attempt to reduce all verbs to a few roots (54 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Attempt to reduce all verbs to a few roots (22 lines)
  From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
Conhistory for my conlang!
- Re: Conhistory for my conlang! (44 lines)
  From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conhistory for my conlang! (47 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conhistory for my conlang! (33 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Conhistory for my conlang! (50 lines)
  From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conhistory for my conlang! (53 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conhistory for my conlang! (51 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Geometry in natlangs (Was: Re: Most developed conlang)
- Geometry in natlangs (Was: Re: Most developed conlang) (120 lines)
  From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Geometry in natlangs (Was: Re: Most developed conlang) (140 lines)
  From: John Crowe <[log in to unmask]>
Gwr Lexicon uploaded
- Gwr Lexicon uploaded (52 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
HELP!!! OPEN OFFICE WRITER
- HELP!!! OPEN OFFICE WRITER (60 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends'
- interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (87 lines)
  From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (47 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (58 lines)
  From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (54 lines)
  From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (56 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (101 lines)
  From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (93 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (89 lines)
  From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
Meghean writing
- Meghean writing (40 lines)
  From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Meghean writing (50 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Meghean writing (42 lines)
  From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Meghean writing (51 lines)
  From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Meghean writing (46 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Meghean writing (62 lines)
  From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
Most developed conlang
- Most developed conlang (25 lines)
  From: John Crowe <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (41 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (40 lines)
  From: Dave Rutan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (50 lines)
  From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (42 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (49 lines)
  From: Dave Rutan <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (47 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (61 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (84 lines)
  From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (57 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (66 lines)
  From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (38 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (47 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (94 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (47 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (54 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (134 lines)
  From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (38 lines)
  From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (40 lines)
  From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (40 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (86 lines)
  From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (63 lines)
  From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (73 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (42 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (38 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (69 lines)
  From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (43 lines)
  From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (99 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (45 lines)
  From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (89 lines)
  From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (123 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (31 lines)
  From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (88 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (34 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (37 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (62 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (66 lines)
  From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (32 lines)
  From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (60 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (47 lines)
  From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (80 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (49 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (96 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (65 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (41 lines)
  From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (58 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (50 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (41 lines)
  From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (81 lines)
  From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (131 lines)
  From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (73 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (101 lines)
  From: John Crowe <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (72 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (149 lines)
  From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (33 lines)
  From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (53 lines)
  From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (165 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (39 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (38 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (82 lines)
  From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (63 lines)
  From: Chris Weimer <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (57 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (87 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (97 lines)
  From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (63 lines)
  From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (77 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (38 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (39 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Most developed conlang (46 lines)
  From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (37 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (38 lines)
  From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (42 lines)
  From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (71 lines)
  From: John Crowe <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (39 lines)
  From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Most developed conlang (46 lines)
  From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
OT: Piraha
- OT: Piraha (54 lines)
  From: Haggen Kennedy <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: Piraha (79 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: Piraha (43 lines)
  From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: Piraha (66 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: Piraha (57 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: Piraha (34 lines)
  From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
Phonetics
- Re: Phonetics (124 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Phonetics (38 lines)
  From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Phonetics (44 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Tatari Faran comparatives
- Re: Tatari Faran comparatives (28 lines)
  From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Tatari Faran comparatives (60 lines)
  From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Tatari Faran comparatives (66 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Tatari Faran comparatives (111 lines)
  From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Tatari Faran comparatives (44 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
TECH: Re: HELP!!! OPEN OFFICE WRITER
- TECH: Re: HELP!!! OPEN OFFICE WRITER (59 lines)
  From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: TECH: Re: HELP!!! OPEN OFFICE WRITER (29 lines)
  From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
Underlining
- Re: Underlining (57 lines)
  From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates
- USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (61 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (65 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (69 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (47 lines)
  From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (46 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (50 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (32 lines)
  From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
Weekly Vocab #2.1.16 (repost #1)
- Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.16 (repost #1) (54 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.16 (repost #1) (53 lines)
  From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.16 (repost #1) (60 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
Weekly Vocab #2.1.17 (repost #1)
- Weekly Vocab #2.1.17 (repost #1) (92 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
[LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days*
- [LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days* (54 lines)
  From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

Back to the main CONLANG page

LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU