Conlang Mailing List – April 2007, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• Attempt to reduce all verbs to a few roots (3 messages)
• Conhistory for my conlang! (6 messages)
• Geometry in natlangs (Was: Re: Most developed conlang) (2 messages)
• Gwr Lexicon uploaded
• HELP!!! OPEN OFFICE WRITER
• interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (8 messages)
• Meghean writing (6 messages)
• Most developed conlang (75 messages)
• OT: Piraha (6 messages)
• Phonetics (3 messages)
• Tatari Faran comparatives (5 messages)
• TECH: Re: HELP!!! OPEN OFFICE WRITER (2 messages)
• Underlining
• USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (7 messages)
• Weekly Vocab #2.1.16 (repost #1) (3 messages)
• Weekly Vocab #2.1.17 (repost #1)
• [LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days*

1. Attempt to reduce all verbs to a few roots
   • Attempt to reduce all verbs to a few roots (162 lines)
     From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Attempt to reduce all verbs to a few roots (54 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Attempt to reduce all verbs to a few roots (22 lines)
     From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>

2. Conhistory for my conlang!
   • Re: Conhistory for my conlang! (44 lines)
     From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conhistory for my conlang! (47 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conhistory for my conlang! (33 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Conhistory for my conlang! (50 lines)
     From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conhistory for my conlang! (53 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conhistory for my conlang! (51 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

3. Geometry in natlangs (Was: Re: Most developed conlang)
   • Geometry in natlangs (Was: Re: Most developed conlang) (120 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Geometry in natlangs (Was: Re: Most developed conlang) (140 lines)
     From: John Crowe <[log in to unmask]>

4. Gwr Lexicon uploaded
   • Gwr Lexicon uploaded (52 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

5. HELP!!! OPEN OFFICE WRITER
   • HELP!!! OPEN OFFICE WRITER (60 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

6. interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends'
   • interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (87 lines)
     From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (47 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (58 lines)
     From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (54 lines)
     From: Patrick Littell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (56 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (101 lines)
     From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (93 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends' (89 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

7. Meghean writing
   • Meghean writing (40 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Meghean writing (50 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Meghean writing (42 lines)
     From: Christian Thalmann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Meghean writing (51 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Meghean writing (46 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Meghean writing (62 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

8. Most developed conlang
   • Most developed conlang (25 lines)
     From: John Crowe <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (41 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (40 lines)
     From: Dave Rutan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (50 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (42 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (49 lines)
     From: Dave Rutan <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (47 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (61 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (84 lines)
     From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (57 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (66 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (38 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (47 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (94 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (47 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (54 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (134 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (38 lines)
     From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (40 lines)
     From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (40 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (86 lines)
     From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (63 lines)
     From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (73 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (42 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (38 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (69 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (43 lines)
     From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (99 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (45 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (89 lines)
     From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (123 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (31 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (88 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (34 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (37 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (62 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (66 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (32 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (60 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (47 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (80 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (49 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (96 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (65 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (41 lines)
     From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (58 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (50 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (41 lines)
     From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (81 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (131 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (73 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (101 lines)
     From: John Crowe <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (72 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (149 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (33 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (53 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (165 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (39 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (38 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (82 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (63 lines)
     From: Chris Weimer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (57 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (87 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (97 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (63 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (77 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (38 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (39 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Most developed conlang (46 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (37 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (38 lines)
     From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (42 lines)
     From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (71 lines)
     From: John Crowe <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (39 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Most developed conlang (46 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

9. OT: Piraha
   • OT: Piraha (54 lines)
     From: Haggen Kennedy <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Piraha (79 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Piraha (43 lines)
     From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Piraha (66 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Piraha (57 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Piraha (34 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

10. Phonetics
    • Re: Phonetics (124 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (38 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Phonetics (44 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

11. Tatari Faran comparatives
    • Re: Tatari Faran comparatives (28 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tatari Faran comparatives (60 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tatari Faran comparatives (66 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tatari Faran comparatives (111 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tatari Faran comparatives (44 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

12. TECH: Re: HELP!!! OPEN OFFICE WRITER
    • TECH: Re: HELP!!! OPEN OFFICE WRITER (59 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Re: HELP!!! OPEN OFFICE WRITER (29 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>

13. Underlining
    • Re: Underlining (57 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

14. USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates
    • USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (61 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (65 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (69 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (47 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (46 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (50 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: onomatopoeia and spelling alternates (32 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

15. Weekly Vocab #2.1.16 (repost #1)
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.16 (repost #1) (54 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.16 (repost #1) (53 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.16 (repost #1) (60 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

16. Weekly Vocab #2.1.17 (repost #1)
    • Weekly Vocab #2.1.17 (repost #1) (92 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

17. [LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days*
    • [LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days* (54 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>