Conlang
Mailing List – April 2007, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Geometry in natlangs (Was: Re: Most developed conlang)
Gwr Lexicon uploaded
(2 messages)
interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends'
(6 messages)
Interview with Andrew Drummond (auth or of A Hand-Book of Volapük) posted
LCC3 suggestion
(2 messages)
Making modifiers out of nouns
Most developed conlang
(41 messages)
Necessary Components of a Language
(9 messages)
Nineteen-year-old language sketch unearthed!
(11 messages)
Order of logograms
(9 messages)
OT (slightly): Tech support from Gutenburg
(5 messages)
PDF correction?
(5 messages)
Star Trek klingon commercial
(4 messages)
TECH: Re: PDF correction?
(2 messages)
THEORY: PIE, laryngeals, and schwa indogermanicus
(5 messages)
USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang
(9 messages)
Weekly Vocab #1.1.7 (repost #1)
Weekly Vocab #2.1.18 (repost #1)
Geometry in natlangs (Was: Re: Most developed conlang)
Re: Geometry in natlangs (Was: Re: Most developed conlang)
(58 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gwr Lexicon uploaded
Re: Gwr Lexicon uploaded
(69 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gwr Lexicon uploaded
(93 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends'
Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends'
(79 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends'
(37 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends'
(39 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends'
(75 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends'
(69 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: interestin' gamelang?: Cuotl from 'Rise of Nations: Rise of Legends'
(105 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Interview with Andrew Drummond (auth or of A Hand-Book of Volapük) posted
Interview with Andrew Drummond (auth or of A Hand-Book of Volapük) posted
(38 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
LCC3 suggestion
LCC3 suggestion
(64 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LCC3 suggestion
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Making modifiers out of nouns
Making modifiers out of nouns
(41 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Most developed conlang
Re: Most developed conlang
(48 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(59 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(115 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(69 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(106 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(112 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(92 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(117 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(49 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(123 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(91 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(119 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(50 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Most developed conlang
(124 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(141 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(64 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(48 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(47 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(63 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(85 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(34 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Most developed conlang
(42 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(39 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Most developed conlang
(51 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(73 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(65 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(45 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(105 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(48 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(103 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(66 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(40 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Most developed conlang
(35 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Most developed conlang
(69 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(55 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(36 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most developed conlang
(33 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Most developed conlang
(39 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Most developed conlang
(27 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Necessary Components of a Language
Necessary Components of a Language
(30 lines)
From:
John Crowe <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Necessary Components of a Language
(79 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Necessary Components of a Language
(47 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Necessary Components of a Language
(35 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Necessary Components of a Language
(52 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Necessary Components of a Language
(59 lines)
From:
H. S. Teoh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Necessary Components of a Language
(34 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Necessary Components of a Language
(41 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Necessary Components of a Language
(61 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nineteen-year-old language sketch unearthed!
Nineteen-year-old language sketch unearthed!
(252 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nineteen-year-old language sketch unearthed!
(46 lines)
From:
Ph.D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nineteen-year-old language sketch unearthed!
(45 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nineteen-year-old language sketch unearthed!
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nineteen-year-old language sketch unearthed!
(35 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nineteen-year-old language sketch unearthed!
(41 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nineteen-year-old language sketch unearthed!
(35 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Nineteen-year-old language sketch unearthed!
(52 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nineteen-year-old language sketch unearthed!
(74 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nineteen-year-old language sketch unearthed!
(49 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nineteen-year-old language sketch unearthed!
(69 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Order of logograms
Order of logograms
(45 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Order of logograms
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Order of logograms
(66 lines)
From:
Elyse M. Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Order of logograms
(85 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Order of logograms
(33 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Order of logograms
(92 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Order of logograms
(89 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Order of logograms
(101 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Order of logograms
(50 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT (slightly): Tech support from Gutenburg
OT (slightly): Tech support from Gutenburg
(30 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT (slightly): Tech support from Gutenburg
(41 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT (slightly): Tech support from Gutenburg
(43 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT (slightly): Tech support from Gutenburg
(31 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT (slightly): Tech support from Gutenburg
(71 lines)
From:
Simen Rustad <
[log in to unmask]
>
PDF correction?
PDF correction?
(45 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PDF correction?
(44 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PDF correction?
(61 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PDF correction?
(57 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: PDF correction?
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Star Trek klingon commercial
Star Trek klingon commercial
(30 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek klingon commercial
(37 lines)
From:
Kelly Drinkwater <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek klingon commercial
(29 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Star Trek klingon commercial
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Re: PDF correction?
TECH: Re: PDF correction?
(81 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Re: PDF correction?
(54 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: PIE, laryngeals, and schwa indogermanicus
THEORY: PIE, laryngeals, and schwa indogermanicus
(34 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: PIE, laryngeals, and schwa indogermanicus
(35 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: PIE, laryngeals, and schwa indogermanicus
(48 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: PIE, laryngeals, and schwa indogermanicus
(57 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: PIE, laryngeals, and schwa indogermanicus
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang
USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang
(105 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang
(42 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang
(47 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang
(48 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang
(36 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang
(41 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang
(54 lines)
From:
T. A. McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab #1.1.7 (repost #1)
Re: Weekly Vocab #1.1.7 (repost #1)
(211 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab #2.1.18 (repost #1)
Weekly Vocab #2.1.18 (repost #1)
(88 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – April 2007, week 4
Conlang Mailing List – April 2007, week 4
