Conlang Mailing List – May 2007, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A language without the verb "take"? (2 messages)
• Any comparative method detectives out there? (6 messages)
• Austronesian style Latin... (15 messages)
• CHAT: mailing lists vs. web-based forums...fora...whatever. (...)
• CHAT: mailing lists vs. web-based forums...fora...whatever. WAS: Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (2 messages)
• Chicken chicken chicken (3 messages)
• CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia)
• Drushek phonology (revised) (2 messages)
• Graeca sine flexione (24 messages)
• GSF revisited (10 messages)
• Is the list dead, the server down or what? (20 messages)
• Making modifiers out of nouns (3 messages)
• PolyF and question (3 messages)
• References to this mailing-list in the Real World (11 messages)
• TECH: Max-per-day change (2 messages)
• USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (15 messages)
• Weekly Vocab #2.1.19 (repost #1)
• [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (12 messages)
• [LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days* (2 messages)

1. A language without the verb "take"?
   • A language without the verb "take"? (28 lines)
     From: Harald S. <[log in to unmask]>
   • A language without the verb "take"? (42 lines)
     From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>

2. Any comparative method detectives out there?
   • Any comparative method detectives out there? (34 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (40 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (33 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (52 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (38 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (42 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>

3. Austronesian style Latin...
   • Austronesian style Latin... (184 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (63 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (213 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (42 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (53 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (50 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (113 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (77 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (47 lines)
     From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (33 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (50 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (74 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (144 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (33 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (94 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

4. CHAT: mailing lists vs. web-based forums...fora...whatever. (...)
   • Re: CHAT: mailing lists vs. web-based forums...fora...whatever. (...) (66 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

5. CHAT: mailing lists vs. web-based forums...fora...whatever. WAS: Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia
   • CHAT: mailing lists vs. web-based forums...fora...whatever. WAS: Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (77 lines)
     From: Mia Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: mailing lists vs. web-based forums...fora...whatever. WAS: Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (62 lines)
     From: Rik <[log in to unmask]>

6. Chicken chicken chicken
   • Chicken chicken chicken (27 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chicken chicken chicken (29 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Chicken chicken chicken (32 lines)
     From: Edward Miller <[log in to unmask]>

7. CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia)
   • CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (57 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

8. Drushek phonology (revised)
   • Drushek phonology (revised) (212 lines)
     From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Drushek phonology (revised) (145 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

9. Graeca sine flexione
   • Graeca sine flexione (50 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (55 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (75 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (112 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (97 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (50 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (47 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (73 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (112 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (66 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (81 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (40 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (51 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (57 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (37 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (48 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (39 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (187 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (81 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (113 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (99 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (130 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (64 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Graeca sine flexione (87 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

10. GSF revisited
    • GSF revisited (182 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: GSF revisited (130 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: GSF revisited (46 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: GSF revisited (56 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: GSF revisited (56 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: GSF revisited (174 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: GSF revisited (270 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: GSF revisited (256 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: GSF revisited (42 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: GSF revisited (65 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

11. Is the list dead, the server down or what?
    • Is the list dead, the server down or what? (40 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (38 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (26 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (28 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (40 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (61 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (66 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (49 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (80 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (74 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (107 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (69 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (36 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (75 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (45 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (51 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (47 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (58 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (47 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

12. Making modifiers out of nouns
    • Re: Making modifiers out of nouns (86 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Making modifiers out of nouns (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Making modifiers out of nouns (44 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

13. PolyF and question
    • PolyF and question (46 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: PolyF and question (102 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: PolyF and question (109 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

14. References to this mailing-list in the Real World
    • References to this mailing-list in the Real World (47 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (63 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (54 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (39 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (61 lines)
      From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (51 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (32 lines)
      From: Dave Rutan <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (54 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (32 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (58 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>

15. TECH: Max-per-day change
    • TECH: Max-per-day change (35 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Max-per-day change (41 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]

16. USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (46 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (38 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (46 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (49 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (62 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (36 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (45 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (61 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (59 lines)
      From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (59 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (51 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (62 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (67 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

17. Weekly Vocab #2.1.19 (repost #1)
    • Weekly Vocab #2.1.19 (repost #1) (88 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

18. [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia
    • Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (41 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (59 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (31 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (38 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (24 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (31 lines)
      From: Harald S. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (28 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (45 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (51 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (37 lines)
      From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (84 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (42 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

19. [LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days*
    • Re: [LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days* (47 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days* (44 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>