Conlang Mailing List – May 2007, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

1. Re: Making modifiers out of nouns (86 lines)
   From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

2. Re: Making modifiers out of nouns (42 lines)
   From: [log in to unmask]

3. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (46 lines)
   From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

4. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (34 lines)
   From: [log in to unmask]

5. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (38 lines)
   From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

6. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (46 lines)
   From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

7. Is the list dead, the server down or what? (40 lines)
   From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

8. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (38 lines)
   From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

9. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (49 lines)
   From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

10. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (62 lines)
    From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

11. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (36 lines)
    From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

12. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (45 lines)
    From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

13. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (61 lines)
    From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

14. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (32 lines)
    From: [log in to unmask]

15. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (59 lines)
    From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>

16. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (59 lines)
    From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

17. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (51 lines)
    From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

18. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (62 lines)
    From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

19. Re: USAGE: -ic(al) Re: [CONLANG] Most developed conlang (67 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

20. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (26 lines)
    From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

21. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (28 lines)
    From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

22. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (40 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

23. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (43 lines)
    From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

24. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (61 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

25. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (66 lines)
    From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

26. Graeca sine flexione (50 lines)
    From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

27. Re: Graeca sine flexione (55 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

28. Re: Making modifiers out of nouns (44 lines)
    From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

29. Re: Graeca sine flexione (75 lines)
    From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

30. Re: Graeca sine flexione (112 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

31. Re: Graeca sine flexione (97 lines)
    From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

32. Re: Graeca sine flexione (50 lines)
    From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

33. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (49 lines)
    From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

34. Weekly Vocab #2.1.19 (repost #1) (88 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

35. Re: Graeca sine flexione (47 lines)
    From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

36. Re: Graeca sine flexione (73 lines)
    From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

37. Re: Graeca sine flexione (112 lines)
    From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

38. Chicken chicken chicken (27 lines)
    From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

39. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (80 lines)
    From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>

40. Re: Graeca sine flexione (66 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

41. References to this mailing-list in the Real World (47 lines)
    From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>

42. Re: Graeca sine flexione (81 lines)
    From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

43. Re: Graeca sine flexione (40 lines)
    From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

44. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (74 lines)
    From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

45. Re: Graeca sine flexione (51 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

46. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (107 lines)
    From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

47. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (69 lines)
    From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>

48. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (36 lines)
    From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

49. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (75 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

50. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (45 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

51. Re: Graeca sine flexione (57 lines)
    From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

52. Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (63 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

53. Re: Graeca sine flexione (37 lines)
    From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

54. Re: Graeca sine flexione (48 lines)
    From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

55. Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (54 lines)
    From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

56. Re: Graeca sine flexione (39 lines)
    From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

57. Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (39 lines)
    From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

58. Re: Chicken chicken chicken (29 lines)
    From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

59. Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (61 lines)
    From: Arnt Richard Johansen <[log in to unmask]>

60. Re: Graeca sine flexione (187 lines)
    From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

61. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (51 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

62. TECH: Max-per-day change (35 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

63. Re: Graeca sine flexione (81 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

64. Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (51 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

65. Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (41 lines)
    From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

66. Re: Chicken chicken chicken (32 lines)
    From: Edward Miller <[log in to unmask]>

67. Re: TECH: Max-per-day change (41 lines)
    From: [log in to unmask]

68. Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (32 lines)
    From: Dave Rutan <[log in to unmask]>

69. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (47 lines)
    From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

70. Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (41 lines)
    From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

71. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (58 lines)
    From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

72. Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (59 lines)
    From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

73. Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (54 lines)
    From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

74. Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (31 lines)
    From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

75. Re: Graeca sine flexione (113 lines)
    From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

76. Re: Graeca sine flexione (99 lines)
    From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

77. Re: Is the list dead, the server down or what? (47 lines)
    From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

78. Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (32 lines)
    From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

79. Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (38 lines)
    From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

80. Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (24 lines)
    From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

81. A language without the verb "take"? (28 lines)
    From: Harald S. <[log in to unmask]>

82. Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (31 lines)
    From: Harald S. <[log in to unmask]>

83. Re: Graeca sine flexione (130 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

84. Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (28 lines)
    From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

85. Re: References to this mailing-list in the Real World (58 lines)
    From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>

86. PolyF and question (46 lines)
    From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

87. Drushek phonology (revised) (212 lines)
    From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>

88. Re: [LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days* (47 lines)
    From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

89. Re: Graeca sine flexione (64 lines)
    From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

90. Re: [LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days* (44 lines)
    From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

91. Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (45 lines)
    From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

92. Re: PolyF and question (102 lines)
    From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

93. Re: PolyF and question (109 lines)
    From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

94. Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (51 lines)
    From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

95. Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (37 lines)
    From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>

96. A language without the verb "take"? (42 lines)
    From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>

97. Austronesian style Latin... (184 lines)
    From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

98. Re: Graeca sine flexione (87 lines)
    From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

99. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (63 lines)
    From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

100. GSF revisited (182 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

101. Re: GSF revisited (130 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

102. Re: GSF revisited (46 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

103. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (213 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

104. Re: GSF revisited (56 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

105. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (42 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

106. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (53 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

107. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (50 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

108. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (113 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

109. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (77 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

110. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (47 lines)
     From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>

111. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (33 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

112. Re: GSF revisited (56 lines)
     From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>

113. Any comparative method detectives out there? (34 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>

114. Re: GSF revisited (174 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

115. Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (40 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

116. Re: GSF revisited (270 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

117. Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (33 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

118. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (50 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

119. Re: Drushek phonology (revised) (145 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

120. Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (52 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

121. Re: GSF revisited (256 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

122. Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (84 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

123. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (74 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

124. Re: GSF revisited (42 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

125. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (144 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

126. CHAT: mailing lists vs. web-based forums...fora...whatever. WAS: Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (77 lines)
     From: Mia Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>

127. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (33 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

128. Re: CHAT: mailing lists vs. web-based forums...fora...whatever. WAS: Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (62 lines)
     From: Rik <[log in to unmask]>

129. Re: GSF revisited (65 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

130. Re: CHAT: mailing lists vs. web-based forums...fora...whatever. (...) (66 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

131. Re: Austronesian style Latin... (94 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>

132. CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (57 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

133. Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (38 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>

134. Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (42 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>

135. Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (42 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>