Conlang Mailing List -- May 2007, week 2

Conlang Mailing List – May 2007, week 2

Sort by

Author | Date | Topic
Chronologically | Most recent first

Options

Show author | Hide author
Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation

Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives

Table of contents:

"Difficult" clauses (24 messages)
Alphabet comparison table for Latin/Greek/Cyrillic (9 messages)
ANADEW? Raising verbs and control verbs
Any comparative method detectives out there? (5 messages)
Austronesian style Latin... (2 messages)
Austronesian/Sino-Tibetan (2 messages)
Borrowing Latin case forms (was Re: EAK nouns) (5 messages)
Confucius and the rectification of names (4 messages)
Conjunctives, etc... (19 messages)
CONLANG Digest - 7 May 2007 to 8 May 2007 (#2007-129)
CONLANG/ZBB crossover
CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (19 messages)
EAK (was: GSF revisited)
EAK Adjectives, Article & Pronouns (6 messages)
EAK nouns (15 messages)
Edible and Drinkable Pronouns?
First verse.
GSF revisited (20 messages)
Help: Looking for Source (7 messages)
How do diacronic conlangers work? (9 messages)
Matthew Faupel
Modern Greek dialects (was: GSF revisited) (2 messages)
nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (21 messages)
numbers as letters (19 messages)
OT: The joys of email (was: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover) (10 messages)
passive ergative? (2 messages)
question (4 messages)
Second verse.
Subject: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (4 messages)
USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (7 messages)
USAGE: name adaptation again (hieret: EAK nouns)
Weekly Vocab #2.1.20 (repost #1)
[BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia
[LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days* (2 messages)

"Difficult" clauses
- "Difficult" clauses (55 lines)
  From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (53 lines)
  From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (35 lines)
  From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (38 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (80 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (47 lines)
  From: Harald S. <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (54 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (82 lines)
  From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (31 lines)
  From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (36 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (56 lines)
  From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (52 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (59 lines)
  From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (63 lines)
  From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (51 lines)
  From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (48 lines)
  From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (45 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (78 lines)
  From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (40 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (35 lines)
  From: Aquamarine Demon <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (35 lines)
  From: Aquamarine Demon <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (34 lines)
  From: Aquamarine Demon <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (47 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: "Difficult" clauses (97 lines)
  From: David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
Alphabet comparison table for Latin/Greek/Cyrillic
- Alphabet comparison table for Latin/Greek/Cyrillic (40 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Alphabet comparison table for Latin/Greek/Cyrillic (52 lines)
  From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Alphabet comparison table for Latin/Greek/Cyrillic (41 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Alphabet comparison table for Latin/Greek/Cyrillic (66 lines)
  From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Alphabet comparison table for Latin/Greek/Cyrillic (92 lines)
  From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Alphabet comparison table for Latin/Greek/Cyrillic (43 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Alphabet comparison table for Latin/Greek/Cyrillic (84 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Alphabet comparison table for Latin/Greek/Cyrillic (54 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Alphabet comparison table for Latin/Greek/Cyrillic (72 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
ANADEW? Raising verbs and control verbs
- ANADEW? Raising verbs and control verbs (56 lines)
  From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
Any comparative method detectives out there?
- Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (52 lines)
  From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (33 lines)
  From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (48 lines)
  From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (50 lines)
  From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (49 lines)
  From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
Austronesian style Latin...
- Re: Austronesian style Latin... (47 lines)
  From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Austronesian style Latin... (55 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Austronesian/Sino-Tibetan
- Austronesian/Sino-Tibetan (42 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Austronesian/Sino-Tibetan (62 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Borrowing Latin case forms (was Re: EAK nouns)
- Borrowing Latin case forms (was Re: EAK nouns) (81 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Borrowing Latin case forms (was Re: EAK nouns) (98 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Borrowing Latin case forms (was Re: EAK nouns) (76 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Borrowing Latin case forms (was Re: EAK nouns) (65 lines)
  From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Borrowing Latin case forms (was Re: EAK nouns) (36 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
Confucius and the rectification of names
- Confucius and the rectification of names (52 lines)
  From: Richard Kennaway <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Confucius and the rectification of names (40 lines)
  From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Confucius and the rectification of names (56 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Confucius and the rectification of names (41 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
Conjunctives, etc...
- Conjunctives, etc... (29 lines)
  From: Chris Weimer <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (37 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (98 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (41 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (51 lines)
  From: Chris Weimer <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (92 lines)
  From: Chris Weimer <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (77 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (46 lines)
  From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (54 lines)
  From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (61 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (110 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (48 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (54 lines)
  From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (59 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (89 lines)
  From: Chris Weimer <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (59 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (108 lines)
  From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (154 lines)
  From: Chris Weimer <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Conjunctives, etc... (107 lines)
  From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
CONLANG Digest - 7 May 2007 to 8 May 2007 (#2007-129)
- Re: CONLANG Digest - 7 May 2007 to 8 May 2007 (#2007-129) (44 lines)
  From: John H. Chalmers <[log in to unmask]>
CONLANG/ZBB crossover
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (40 lines)
  From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia)
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (60 lines)
  From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (40 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (65 lines)
  From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (47 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (73 lines)
  From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (51 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (63 lines)
  From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (82 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (91 lines)
  From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (39 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (91 lines)
  From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (52 lines)
  From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (45 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (56 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (55 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (63 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (38 lines)
  From: robert wilson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (78 lines)
  From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (103 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
EAK (was: GSF revisited)
- EAK (was: GSF revisited) (73 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
EAK Adjectives, Article & Pronouns
- EAK Adjectives, Article & Pronouns (204 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK Adjectives, Article & Pronouns (39 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK Adjectives, Article & Pronouns (54 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK Adjectives, Article & Pronouns (55 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK Adjectives, Article & Pronouns (38 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK Adjectives, Article & Pronouns (57 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
EAK nouns
- EAK nouns (107 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (54 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (73 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (90 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (63 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (48 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (155 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (199 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (171 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (49 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (74 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (58 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (67 lines)
  From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (62 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: EAK nouns (58 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
Edible and Drinkable Pronouns?
- Edible and Drinkable Pronouns? (72 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
First verse.
- First verse. (52 lines)
  From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
GSF revisited
- Re: GSF revisited (76 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (81 lines)
  From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (84 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (63 lines)
  From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (70 lines)
  From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (85 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (61 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (68 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (46 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (61 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (52 lines)
  From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (49 lines)
  From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (50 lines)
  From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (54 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (74 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (44 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (61 lines)
  From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (59 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (70 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: GSF revisited (67 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
Help: Looking for Source
- Help: Looking for Source (52 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Help: Looking for Source (32 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: Help: Looking for Source (53 lines)
  From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Help: Looking for Source (60 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Help: Looking for Source (45 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Help: Looking for Source (58 lines)
  From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Help: Looking for Source (46 lines)
  From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
How do diacronic conlangers work?
- How do diacronic conlangers work? (113 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: How do diacronic conlangers work? (43 lines)
  From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: How do diacronic conlangers work? (103 lines)
  From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: How do diacronic conlangers work? (139 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: How do diacronic conlangers work? (158 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: How do diacronic conlangers work? (69 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: How do diacronic conlangers work? (98 lines)
  From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: How do diacronic conlangers work? (105 lines)
  From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: How do diacronic conlangers work? (66 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
Matthew Faupel
- Matthew Faupel (27 lines)
  From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
Modern Greek dialects (was: GSF revisited)
- Modern Greek dialects (was: GSF revisited) (78 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Modern Greek dialects (was: GSF revisited) (52 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else
- nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (23 lines)
  From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (53 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (42 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (46 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (46 lines)
  From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (62 lines)
  From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (46 lines)
  From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (52 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (42 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (63 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (75 lines)
  From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (59 lines)
  From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (57 lines)
  From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (143 lines)
  From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (60 lines)
  From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (56 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (53 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (45 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (83 lines)
  From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (49 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (100 lines)
  From: Tim Smith <[log in to unmask]>
numbers as letters
- numbers as letters (25 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: numbers as letters (41 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (39 lines)
  From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (55 lines)
  From: Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (54 lines)
  From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (81 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (76 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (63 lines)
  From: Tristan Plumb <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (37 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: numbers as letters (28 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: numbers as letters (49 lines)
  From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (51 lines)
  From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (42 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (61 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (34 lines)
  From: [log in to unmask]
- Re: numbers as letters (55 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (35 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (56 lines)
  From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: numbers as letters (48 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
OT: The joys of email (was: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover)
- OT: The joys of email (was: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover) (78 lines)
  From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: The joys of email (was: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover) (40 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: The joys of email (was: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover) (39 lines)
  From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: The joys of email (was: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover) (44 lines)
  From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: The joys of email (was: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover) (45 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: The joys of email (was: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover) (44 lines)
  From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: The joys of email (was: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover) (61 lines)
  From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: The joys of email (was: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover) (82 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: The joys of email (was: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover) (88 lines)
  From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: OT: The joys of email (was: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover) (58 lines)
  From: Tristan Plumb <[log in to unmask]>
passive ergative?
- passive ergative? (38 lines)
  From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: passive ergative? (58 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
question
- question (24 lines)
  From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: question (27 lines)
  From: Kelly Drinkwater <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: question (25 lines)
  From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: question (64 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
Second verse.
- Second verse. (69 lines)
  From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia)
- Subject: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (41 lines)
  From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Subject: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (54 lines)
  From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Subject: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (43 lines)
  From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: Subject: Re: CONLANG/ZBB crossover (WAS: CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia) (64 lines)
  From: Mia Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited)
- Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (105 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (82 lines)
  From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (52 lines)
  From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (69 lines)
  From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (38 lines)
  From: Ph.D. <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (43 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (51 lines)
  From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
USAGE: name adaptation again (hieret: EAK nouns)
- Re: USAGE: name adaptation again (hieret: EAK nouns) (71 lines)
  From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
Weekly Vocab #2.1.20 (repost #1)
- Weekly Vocab #2.1.20 (repost #1) (90 lines)
  From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
[BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia
- Re: [BoD] CONLANG article deleted from Wikipedia (41 lines)
  From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
[LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days*
- Re: [LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days* (48 lines)
  From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
- Re: [LCC] LCC2 will be over *two full days* (108 lines)
  From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

Back to the main CONLANG page

LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU