Conlang Mailing List – May 2007, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• Éadig Éowine (6 messages)
• Éadig Éowine (was: Re: USAGE: N ame adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (2 messages)
• Éadig Éowine (was: Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited)
• "Difficult" clauses (9 messages)
• "Vente Boral i Sul" n'Terkunan (4 messages)
• Any comparative method detectives out there? (4 messages)
• Austronesian style Latin...
• Borrowing Latin case forms (was Re: EAK nouns) (3 messages)
• Conjunctives, etc...
• EAK - two problems (13 messages)
• EAK Adjectives, Article & Pronouns (2 messages)
• EAK nouns (4 messages)
• EAK numerals (2 messages)
• EAK Romanization et alia (4 messages)
• Fwd: Éadig Éowine (was: Re: USAGE: N ame adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited)
• Fwd: OT: Testing 1-2-3
• Fwd: Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited)
• German particles (was Re: OT: German Imperatives) (3 messages)
• Gmane (was Re: OT: Testing 1-2-3)
• Help: Looking for Source (2 messages)
• Imperatives (Was: Re: OT: German Imperatives) (6 messages)
• nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (2 messages)
• OT: German Imperatives (6 messages)
• OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (13 messages)
• OT: Testing 1-2-3 (7 messages)
• Possessives
• Possessives (was: Re: EAK nouns)
• question (2 messages)
• Short vacation (7 messages)
• Sorting PIE with IPA (8 messages)
• Terkunan question (3 messages)
• USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (13 messages)
• Weekly Vocab #2.1.21 (repost #1)
• weights and measure (6 messages)
• [LCC] Language Creation Conference 2 - the schedule!

1. Éadig Éowine
   • Re: Éadig Éowine (54 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 20:18:12 +1000
   • Re: Éadig Éowine (39 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 12:51:56 +0200
   • Re: Éadig Éowine (45 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 21:18:22 +1000
   • Re: Éadig Éowine (67 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 14:12:32 +0200
   • Re: Éadig Éowine (45 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 16:18:06 +0200
   • Re: Éadig Éowine (61 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 23:15:40 +0100

2. Éadig Éowine (was: Re: USAGE: N ame adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited)
   • Re: Éadig Éowine (was: Re: USAGE: N ame adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (49 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:52:19 +0200
   • Re: Éadig Éowine (was: Re: USAGE: N ame adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (60 lines)
     From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:01:05 +0100

3. Éadig Éowine (was: Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited)
   • Éadig Éowine (was: Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (56 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 23:18:38 +0100

4. "Difficult" clauses
   • Re: "Difficult" clauses (37 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:25:33 EDT
   • Re: "Difficult" clauses (46 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 15:04:04 +0200
   • Re: "Difficult" clauses (59 lines)
     From: David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:26:45 -0400
   • Re: "Difficult" clauses (80 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:23:27 +0200
   • Re: "Difficult" clauses (63 lines)
     From: David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:56:23 -0400
   • Re: "Difficult" clauses (39 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:35:25 -0500
   • Re: "Difficult" clauses (39 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 18:03:09 -0500
   • Re: "Difficult" clauses (68 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 18:12:13 -0500
   • Re: "Difficult" clauses (102 lines)
     From: Sam Pointon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 01:12:45 +0100

5. "Vente Boral i Sul" n'Terkunan
   • "Vente Boral i Sul" n'Terkunan (41 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 21:52:44 +0200
   • Re: "Vente Boral i Sul" n'Terkunan (54 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 17:33:20 -0700
   • Re: "Vente Boral i Sul" n'Terkunan (104 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:57:06 +0200
   • Re: "Vente Boral i Sul" n'Terkunan (38 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 12:49:46 +0200

6. Any comparative method detectives out there?
   • Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (43 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 12:37:06 -0700
   • Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (42 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 19:22:06 -0400
   • Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (60 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 17:37:39 -0700
   • Re: Any comparative method detectives out there? (37 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 11:03:01 -0400

7. Austronesian style Latin...
   • Re: Austronesian style Latin... (59 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:36:47 +0200

8. Borrowing Latin case forms (was Re: EAK nouns)
   • Re: Borrowing Latin case forms (was Re: EAK nouns) (54 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:45:56 +0200
   • Re: Borrowing Latin case forms (was Re: EAK nouns) (32 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:46:22 -0400
   • Re: Borrowing Latin case forms (was Re: EAK nouns) (34 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:55:12 -0400

9. Conjunctives, etc...
   • Re: Conjunctives, etc... (97 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:16:25 +0100

10. EAK - two problems
    • EAK - two problems (108 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 08:34:54 +0100
    • Re: EAK - two problems (144 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 12:14:15 +0200
    • Re: EAK - two problems (58 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 12:46:43 +0200
    • Re: EAK - two problems (197 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 15:32:52 +0100
    • Re: EAK - two problems (70 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 16:16:00 +0100
    • Re: EAK - two problems (131 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 18:00:38 +0200
    • Re: EAK - two problems (156 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 22:16:33 +0100
    • Re: EAK - two problems (98 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:27:52 +0100
    • Re: EAK - two problems (98 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 16:49:48 +0200
    • Re: EAK - two problems (181 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:49:56 +0100
    • Re: EAK - two problems (62 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:22:51 +0200
    • Re: EAK - two problems (88 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:26:21 +0100
    • Re: EAK - two problems (88 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:57:37 -0500

11. EAK Adjectives, Article & Pronouns
    • Re: EAK Adjectives, Article & Pronouns (49 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 22:58:28 +0200
    • Re: EAK Adjectives, Article & Pronouns (66 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 08:42:35 +0100

12. EAK nouns
    • Re: EAK nouns (58 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:28:35 +0200
    • Re: EAK nouns (43 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 01:27:32 +0200
    • Re: EAK nouns (38 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 01:52:15 -0000
    • Re: EAK nouns (58 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:20:35 +0200

13. EAK numerals
    • EAK numerals (90 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 21:20:50 +0100
    • Re: EAK numerals (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 16:49:09 -0400

14. EAK Romanization et alia
    • EAK Romanization et alia (159 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:51:16 +0100
    • Re: EAK Romanization et alia (139 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 22:52:54 +0200
    • Re: EAK Romanization et alia (166 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 08:25:40 +0100
    • Re: EAK Romanization et alia (109 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:48:58 +0200

15. Fwd: Éadig Éowine (was: Re: USAGE: N ame adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited)
    • Fwd: Éadig Éowine (was: Re: USAGE: N ame adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (73 lines)
      From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 01:17:25 +0100

16. Fwd: OT: Testing 1-2-3
    • Fwd: OT: Testing 1-2-3 (45 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:09:19 -0000

17. Fwd: Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited)
    • Fwd: Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (81 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 01:47:44 -0000

18. German particles (was Re: OT: German Imperatives)
    • German particles (was Re: OT: German Imperatives) (106 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 05:04:21 -0400
    • Re: German particles (was Re: OT: German Imperatives) (90 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:30:24 +0200
    • Re: German particles (was Re: OT: German Imperatives) (39 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 07:25:01 EDT

19. Gmane (was Re: OT: Testing 1-2-3)
    • Gmane (was Re: OT: Testing 1-2-3) (33 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:39:46 +0200

20. Help: Looking for Source
    • Re: Help: Looking for Source (78 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 22:35:30 +0200
    • Re: Help: Looking for Source (74 lines)
      From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:46:26 -0700

21. Imperatives (Was: Re: OT: German Imperatives)
    • Imperatives (Was: Re: OT: German Imperatives) (108 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:24:47 -0700
    • Re: Imperatives (Was: Re: OT: German Imperatives) (61 lines)
      From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:44:04 +0100
    • Re: Imperatives (Was: Re: OT: German Imperatives) (114 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:49:39 -0700
    • Re: Imperatives (Was: Re: OT: German Imperatives) (66 lines)
      From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 02:50:54 +0100
    • Re: Imperatives (Was: Re: OT: German Imperatives) (62 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 19:44:46 -0700
    • Re: Imperatives (Was: Re: OT: German Imperatives) (50 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:48:48 -0400

22. nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else
    • Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (42 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 06:26:06 -0400
    • Re: nom/accu pronouns erg/abs everything else (31 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:12:33 -0400

23. OT: German Imperatives
    • OT: German Imperatives (59 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:06:19 -0700
    • Re: OT: German Imperatives (90 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 01:24:58 +0200
    • Re: OT: German Imperatives (56 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:00:52 -0700
    • Re: OT: German Imperatives (78 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 04:13:41 +0200
    • Re: OT: German Imperatives (108 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:26:09 +0200
    • Re: OT: German Imperatives (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:27:20 +0200

24. OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.)
    • OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (263 lines)
      From: Javier BF <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:45:13 -0400
    • Re: OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (306 lines)
      From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 00:17:50 +0100
    • Re: OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (43 lines)
      From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 00:22:24 +0100
    • Re: OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (62 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 20:09:02 -0400
    • Re: OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (107 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 19:15:02 -0500
    • Re: OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (57 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 20:40:46 -0400
    • Re: OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (50 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:14:31 -0500
    • Re: OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (65 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:47:55 -0700
    • Re: OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (50 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:32:02 -0400
    • Re: OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (94 lines)
      From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 18:49:45 -0700
    • Re: OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (125 lines)
      From: Javier BF <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 15:46:59 -0400
    • Re: OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (99 lines)
      From: Krista Casada <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 09:36:20 -0500
    • Re: OT: Spanish pronouns ("usted", etc.) (37 lines)
      From: Krista Casada <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:24:42 -0500

25. OT: Testing 1-2-3
    • OT: Testing 1-2-3 (53 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:39:58 -0000
    • Re: OT: Testing 1-2-3 (45 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 19:13:26 -0500
    • Re: OT: Testing 1-2-3 (36 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 08:28:37 +0200
    • Re: OT: Testing 1-2-3 (54 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:04:38 +1000
    • Re: OT: Testing 1-2-3 (60 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 13:20:59 -0400
    • Re: OT: Testing 1-2-3 (56 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 16:34:30 -0500
    • Re: OT: Testing 1-2-3 (61 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:39:53 -0700

26. Possessives
    • Re: Possessives (75 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:12:23 +0200

27. Possessives (was: Re: EAK nouns)
    • Possessives (was: Re: EAK nouns) (47 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:36:59 +1000

28. question
    • Re: question (54 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 06:59:09 -0400
    • Re: question (45 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:19:02 +0200

29. Short vacation
    • Short vacation (29 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 04:16:24 +0200
    • Re: Short vacation (43 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 19:39:27 -0700
    • Re: Short vacation (47 lines)
      From: Kelly Drinkwater <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:10:26 -0700
    • Re: Short vacation (46 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:31:49 -0700
    • Re: Short vacation (33 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:30:34 +0200
    • Re: Short vacation (48 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:00:17 +0200
    • Re: Short vacation (44 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:00:44 +0200

30. Sorting PIE with IPA
    • Sorting PIE with IPA (63 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:18:59 -0400
    • Re: Sorting PIE with IPA (105 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:01:52 -0230
    • Re: Sorting PIE with IPA (103 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:06:42 -0400
    • Re: Sorting PIE with IPA (84 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 20:02:42 -0230
    • Re: Sorting PIE with IPA (97 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:57:22 -0400
    • Re: Sorting PIE with IPA (55 lines)
      From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:48:25 -0400
    • Re: Sorting PIE with IPA (65 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:55:56 -0500
    • Re: Sorting PIE with IPA (67 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:27:34 -0400

31. Terkunan question
    • Terkunan question (32 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 00:46:34 +0200
    • Re: Terkunan question (47 lines)
      From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 17:53:47 -0700
    • Re: Terkunan question (42 lines)
      From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 02:00:14 +0100

32. USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited)
    • Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (89 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:53:17 -0600
    • Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (46 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:15:45 +1000
    • Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (53 lines)
      From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:43:18 -0700
    • Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (105 lines)
      From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:27:28 -0700
    • Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (71 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 23:36:45 -0700
    • Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (106 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:49:38 +0200
    • Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (64 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:15:15 +0200
    • Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (83 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:28:51 +0200
    • Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (79 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:07:35 +0100
    • Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (47 lines)
      From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:07:35 +0100
    • Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (35 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:58:35 -0000
    • Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (67 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 15:04:24 -0000
    • Re: USAGE: Name adaptation (fuit: GSF revisited) (50 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:47:23 +0200

33. Weekly Vocab #2.1.21 (repost #1)
    • Weekly Vocab #2.1.21 (repost #1) (90 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 06:01:01 +0200

34. weights and measure
    • weights and measure (25 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 21:31:20 -0400
    • Re: weights and measure (19 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 21:35:15 -0400
    • Re: weights and measure (46 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 21:35:17 -0500
    • Re: weights and measure (43 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 23:06:21 -0400
    • Re: weights and measure (46 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 19:32:33 +0200
    • Re: weights and measure (38 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:41:15 -0400

35. [LCC] Language Creation Conference 2 - the schedule!
    • [LCC] Language Creation Conference 2 - the schedule! (100 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:43:03 -0700