Conlang
Mailing List – June 2007, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
/w/ vs /B/
(7 messages)
Allophone Problem
(16 messages)
Burushaski
(6 messages)
Comparatives (Difficult?!)
(11 messages)
Gary Shannon's testing sentences
(3 messages)
Grammar-holes: secondary predication
(8 messages)
If you were to mark only one participant on the verb...
(3 messages)
New Polysynthetic (?) Language
(9 messages)
Syntactic stuff in Volndí a Zanra (Old Sanhr)
TECH: Sound-Change Rules Syntax
(3 messages)
Theory: Conlangs?
(2 messages)
Theory: Required Reading?
(5 messages)
Weekly Vocab #2.1.23 (repost #1)
/w/ vs /B/
Re: /w/ vs /B/
(61 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /w/ vs /B/
(39 lines)
From:
Barry Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /w/ vs /B/
(103 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /w/ vs /B/
(54 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /w/ vs /B/
(76 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /w/ vs /B/
(65 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: /w/ vs /B/
(83 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Allophone Problem
Allophone Problem
(43 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(57 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(78 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(71 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(56 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(73 lines)
From:
T. A. McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(73 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(32 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Allophone Problem
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(50 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(35 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(74 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(45 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(61 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(90 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Allophone Problem
(52 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Burushaski
Burushaski
(54 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Burushaski
(50 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Burushaski
(63 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Burushaski
(42 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Burushaski
(62 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Burushaski
(46 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Comparatives (Difficult?!)
Comparatives (Difficult?!)
(128 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!)
(62 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!)
(63 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!)
(73 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!)
(52 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!)
(52 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!)
(62 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!)
(50 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!)
(58 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!)
(48 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!)
(62 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Gary Shannon's testing sentences
Re: Gary Shannon's testing sentences
(47 lines)
From:
Michael Potter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Gary Shannon's testing sentences
(34 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Gary Shannon's testing sentences
(61 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Grammar-holes: secondary predication
Grammar-holes: secondary predication
(77 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication
(77 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication
(125 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication
(81 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication
(25 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication
(38 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication
(73 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication
(46 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
If you were to mark only one participant on the verb...
If you were to mark only one participant on the verb...
(77 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If you were to mark only one participant on the verb...
(68 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: If you were to mark only one participant on the verb...
(98 lines)
From:
Paul Roser <
[log in to unmask]
>
New Polysynthetic (?) Language
New Polysynthetic (?) Language
(33 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language
(66 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language
(84 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language
(56 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language
(59 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language
(56 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language
(43 lines)
From:
Ben Haanstra <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language
(68 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language
(75 lines)
From:
Joseph Fatula <
[log in to unmask]
>
Syntactic stuff in Volndí a Zanra (Old Sanhr)
Syntactic stuff in Volndí a Zanra (Old Sanhr)
(106 lines)
From:
Peter Ara Guekguezian <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Sound-Change Rules Syntax
TECH: Sound-Change Rules Syntax
(45 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Sound-Change Rules Syntax
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Sound-Change Rules Syntax
(60 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Theory: Conlangs?
Re: Theory: Conlangs?
(57 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theory: Conlangs?
(71 lines)
From:
Douglas Treadwell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Theory: Required Reading?
Re: Theory: Required Reading?
(58 lines)
From:
David G. Durand <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theory: Required Reading?
(65 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theory: Required Reading?
(44 lines)
From:
Wayne Chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Theory: Required Reading?
(46 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Theory: Required Reading?
(38 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab #2.1.23 (repost #1)
Weekly Vocab #2.1.23 (repost #1)
(88 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – June 2007, week 1
Conlang Mailing List – June 2007, week 1
