Conlang Mailing List – June 2007, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show contributor list | Hide contributor list

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

List of contributors:

• Wayne Chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
• taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
• Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]> (8 messages)
• Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Peter Ara Guekguezian <[log in to unmask]>
• Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
• Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• [log in to unmask] (3 messages)
• Michael Potter <[log in to unmask]>
• Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
• [log in to unmask]
• Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]> (9 messages)
• John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
• Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
• Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
• Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Douglas Treadwell <[log in to unmask]>
• Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
• Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
• David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
• Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
• Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]> (6 messages)
• Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
• Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
• And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
• Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>

1. Wayne Chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Theory: Required Reading? (44 lines)
     Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:10:50 -0700

2. taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (68 lines)
     Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:40:21 +0200
   • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (73 lines)
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:35:29 +0200
   • Grammar-holes: secondary predication (77 lines)
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:17:19 +0200
   • Burushaski (54 lines)
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:41:18 +0200

3. T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Allophone Problem (73 lines)
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:05:23 +1000

4. Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (125 lines)
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:35:10 -0400
   • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (62 lines)
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:57:52 -0400
   • Re: Burushaski (42 lines)
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:47:44 -0400
   • Re: Burushaski (63 lines)
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:37:34 -0400
   • Re: Allophone Problem (90 lines)
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:34:43 -0400
   • Re: Allophone Problem (74 lines)
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:12:18 -0400
   • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (83 lines)
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 00:31:14 -0400
   • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (61 lines)
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 01:15:09 -0400

5. Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (50 lines)
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:50:05 +0200
   • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (52 lines)
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 08:53:36 +0200
   • Re: Allophone Problem (42 lines)
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:42:17 +0200

6. Peter Ara Guekguezian <[log in to unmask]>
   • Syntactic stuff in Volndí a Zanra (Old Sanhr) (106 lines)
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:13:53 -0700

7. Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: If you were to mark only one participant on the verb... (98 lines)
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:37:21 -0400

8. Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: TECH: Sound-Change Rules Syntax (60 lines)
     Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:07:36 -0400
   • TECH: Sound-Change Rules Syntax (45 lines)
     Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:31:48 -0400
   • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (56 lines)
     Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 12:44:55 -0400

9. [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (38 lines)
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:42:54 EDT
   • Re: Gary Shannon's testing sentences (34 lines)
     Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:59:22 EDT
   • Re: Allophone Problem (32 lines)
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:36:33 EDT

10. Michael Potter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gary Shannon's testing sentences (47 lines)
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 07:08:57 -0400

11. Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Allophone Problem (73 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:13:19 -0400

12. [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Theory: Required Reading? (46 lines)
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:09:28 -0400

13. Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (75 lines)
      Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 21:40:56 -0700
    • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (56 lines)
      Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 02:00:03 -0700
    • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (84 lines)
      Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 01:51:42 -0700
    • New Polysynthetic (?) Language (33 lines)
      Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 01:11:56 -0700
    • Re: Allophone Problem (61 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 23:07:58 -0700
    • Re: Allophone Problem (45 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:43:37 -0700
    • Re: Allophone Problem (71 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 03:25:18 -0700
    • Re: Allophone Problem (78 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 03:17:32 -0700
    • Allophone Problem (43 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 02:51:28 -0700

14. John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Allophone Problem (35 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:32:26 -0400

15. Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Theory: Conlangs? (57 lines)
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:52:13 -0400

16. Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: If you were to mark only one participant on the verb... (68 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:59:50 -0400
    • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (77 lines)
      Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:38:49 -0400

17. Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (62 lines)
      Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:36:33 +0100
    • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (62 lines)
      Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:25:29 +0100

18. Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Theory: Required Reading? (38 lines)
      Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:18:38 +0200

19. Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (46 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:05:52 -0500
    • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (52 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:48:07 -0500

20. Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Weekly Vocab #2.1.23 (repost #1) (88 lines)
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 06:01:01 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Sound-Change Rules Syntax (49 lines)
      Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 22:05:25 +0200
    • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (73 lines)
      Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 03:48:29 +0200

21. Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (65 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:42:26 -0500
    • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (76 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:38:32 -0500

22. Douglas Treadwell <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Theory: Conlangs? (71 lines)
      Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 01:06:16 -0700

23. Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (63 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:06:42 +0000

24. Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Allophone Problem (50 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 09:18:06 -0600

25. David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (59 lines)
      Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 02:08:38 -0700
    • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (66 lines)
      Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 01:27:30 -0700
    • Re: Burushaski (50 lines)
      Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:21:01 -0700
    • Re: Allophone Problem (57 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 03:08:39 -0700

26. David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Theory: Required Reading? (58 lines)
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:28:12 -0400

27. Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Allophone Problem (56 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 12:53:32 +0200

28. Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (25 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:35:39 -0400
    • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (81 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:33:29 -0400
    • Comparatives (Difficult?!) (128 lines)
      Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:31:45 +0200

29. caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (48 lines)
      Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:46:24 -0000
    • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (58 lines)
      Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:40:50 -0000

30. Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Theory: Required Reading? (65 lines)
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 16:52:27 +0200
    • If you were to mark only one participant on the verb... (77 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:52:38 +0200
    • Re: Burushaski (46 lines)
      Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:16:43 +0200
    • Re: Burushaski (62 lines)
      Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:29:28 +0200
    • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (54 lines)
      Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:33:20 +0200
    • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (103 lines)
      Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:32:30 +0200

31. Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (43 lines)
      Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 13:52:19 -0400

32. Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (39 lines)
      Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:47:55 -0700

33. And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Allophone Problem (52 lines)
      Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:58:17 +0100

34. Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Gary Shannon's testing sentences (61 lines)
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 08:26:02 -0700