Conlang Mailing List – June 2007, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• CHAT: Constructed maps (6 messages)
• CONLANG Digest - 15 Jun 2007 to 16 Jun 2007 (#2007-167)
• Constructed maps (4 messages)
• Fwd: Re: languages in reverse
• Fwd: Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence?
• languages in reverse (21 messages)
• Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (14 messages)
• Mir ist kalt; or, Polysemy revisited (2 messages)
• Polysemy (9 messages)
• TECH: Sligh Site Redesign
• Weekly Vocab #2.1.25 (repost #1)

1. CHAT: Constructed maps
   • CHAT: Constructed maps (45 lines)
     From: Rik <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Constructed maps (54 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Constructed maps (72 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Constructed maps (33 lines)
     From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Constructed maps (48 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: Constructed maps (53 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

2. CONLANG Digest - 15 Jun 2007 to 16 Jun 2007 (#2007-167)
   • Re: CONLANG Digest - 15 Jun 2007 to 16 Jun 2007 (#2007-167) (40 lines)
     From: John H. Chalmers <[log in to unmask]>

3. Constructed maps
   • Re: Constructed maps (66 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Constructed maps (66 lines)
     From: ryan beaton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Constructed maps (80 lines)
     From: Rik <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Constructed maps (36 lines)
     From: Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <[log in to unmask]>

4. Fwd: Re: languages in reverse
   • Fwd: Re: languages in reverse (41 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

5. Fwd: Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence?
   • Fwd: Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (44 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>

6. languages in reverse
   • languages in reverse (27 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: languages in reverse (51 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: languages in reverse (75 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: languages in reverse (36 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: languages in reverse (42 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: languages in reverse (42 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: languages in reverse (34 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: languages in reverse (62 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: languages in reverse (38 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: languages in reverse (58 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: languages in reverse (36 lines)
     From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: languages in reverse (38 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: languages in reverse (49 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: languages in reverse (34 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: languages in reverse (40 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: languages in reverse (48 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: languages in reverse (35 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: languages in reverse (33 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: languages in reverse (41 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: languages in reverse (60 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: languages in reverse (93 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>

7. Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence?
   • Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (44 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (57 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (61 lines)
     From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (40 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (47 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (51 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (32 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (43 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (69 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (46 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (46 lines)
     From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (63 lines)
     From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (53 lines)
     From: Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (57 lines)
     From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>

8. Mir ist kalt; or, Polysemy revisited
   • Re: Mir ist kalt; or, Polysemy revisited (48 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt; or, Polysemy revisited (52 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

9. Polysemy
   • Re: Polysemy (90 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Polysemy (62 lines)
     From: H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Polysemy (44 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Polysemy (44 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Polysemy (50 lines)
     From: Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Polysemy (66 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Polysemy (34 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Polysemy (41 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Polysemy (41 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

10. TECH: Sligh Site Redesign
    • Re: TECH: Sligh Site Redesign (39 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

11. Weekly Vocab #2.1.25 (repost #1)
    • Weekly Vocab #2.1.25 (repost #1) (87 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>