Conlang Mailing List – June 2007, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• /w/ vs /B/ (7 messages)
• Allophone Problem (16 messages)
• Burushaski (6 messages)
• Comparatives (Difficult?!) (11 messages)
• Gary Shannon's testing sentences (3 messages)
• Grammar-holes: secondary predication (8 messages)
• If you were to mark only one participant on the verb... (3 messages)
• New Polysynthetic (?) Language (9 messages)
• Syntactic stuff in Volndí a Zanra (Old Sanhr)
• TECH: Sound-Change Rules Syntax (3 messages)
• Theory: Conlangs? (2 messages)
• Theory: Required Reading? (5 messages)
• Weekly Vocab #2.1.23 (repost #1)

1. /w/ vs /B/
   • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (61 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 01:15:09 -0400
   • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (39 lines)
     From: Barry Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 22:47:55 -0700
   • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (103 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:32:30 +0200
   • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (54 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:33:20 +0200
   • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (76 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:38:32 -0500
   • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (65 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:42:26 -0500
   • Re: /w/ vs /B/ (83 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 00:31:14 -0400

2. Allophone Problem
   • Allophone Problem (43 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 02:51:28 -0700
   • Re: Allophone Problem (57 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 03:08:39 -0700
   • Re: Allophone Problem (78 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 03:17:32 -0700
   • Re: Allophone Problem (71 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 03:25:18 -0700
   • Re: Allophone Problem (56 lines)
     From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 12:53:32 +0200
   • Re: Allophone Problem (73 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:05:23 +1000
   • Re: Allophone Problem (73 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:13:19 -0400
   • Re: Allophone Problem (32 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:36:33 EDT
   • Re: Allophone Problem (42 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:42:17 +0200
   • Re: Allophone Problem (50 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 09:18:06 -0600
   • Re: Allophone Problem (35 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:32:26 -0400
   • Re: Allophone Problem (74 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:12:18 -0400
   • Re: Allophone Problem (45 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:43:37 -0700
   • Re: Allophone Problem (61 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 23:07:58 -0700
   • Re: Allophone Problem (90 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:34:43 -0400
   • Re: Allophone Problem (52 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:58:17 +0100

3. Burushaski
   • Burushaski (54 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 19:41:18 +0200
   • Re: Burushaski (50 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:21:01 -0700
   • Re: Burushaski (63 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:37:34 -0400
   • Re: Burushaski (42 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 14:47:44 -0400
   • Re: Burushaski (62 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 21:29:28 +0200
   • Re: Burushaski (46 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:16:43 +0200

4. Comparatives (Difficult?!)
   • Comparatives (Difficult?!) (128 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:31:45 +0200
   • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (62 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 14:57:52 -0400
   • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (63 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:06:42 +0000
   • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (73 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 03:48:29 +0200
   • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (52 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:48:07 -0500
   • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (52 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 08:53:36 +0200
   • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (62 lines)
     From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:25:29 +0100
   • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (50 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:50:05 +0200
   • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (58 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:40:50 -0000
   • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (48 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:46:24 -0000
   • Re: Comparatives (Difficult?!) (62 lines)
     From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:36:33 +0100

5. Gary Shannon's testing sentences
   • Re: Gary Shannon's testing sentences (47 lines)
     From: Michael Potter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 07:08:57 -0400
   • Re: Gary Shannon's testing sentences (34 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:59:22 EDT
   • Re: Gary Shannon's testing sentences (61 lines)
     From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 08:26:02 -0700

6. Grammar-holes: secondary predication
   • Grammar-holes: secondary predication (77 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:17:19 +0200
   • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (77 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 08:38:49 -0400
   • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (125 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:35:10 -0400
   • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (81 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:33:29 -0400
   • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (25 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:35:39 -0400
   • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (38 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:42:54 EDT
   • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (73 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:35:29 +0200
   • Re: Grammar-holes: secondary predication (46 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:05:52 -0500

7. If you were to mark only one participant on the verb...
   • If you were to mark only one participant on the verb... (77 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:52:38 +0200
   • Re: If you were to mark only one participant on the verb... (68 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:59:50 -0400
   • Re: If you were to mark only one participant on the verb... (98 lines)
     From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:37:21 -0400

8. New Polysynthetic (?) Language
   • New Polysynthetic (?) Language (33 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 01:11:56 -0700
   • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (66 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 01:27:30 -0700
   • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (84 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 01:51:42 -0700
   • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (56 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 02:00:03 -0700
   • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (59 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 02:08:38 -0700
   • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (56 lines)
     From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 12:44:55 -0400
   • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (43 lines)
     From: Ben Haanstra <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 13:52:19 -0400
   • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (68 lines)
     From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 22:40:21 +0200
   • Re: New Polysynthetic (?) Language (75 lines)
     From: Joseph Fatula <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 21:40:56 -0700

9. Syntactic stuff in Volndí a Zanra (Old Sanhr)
   • Syntactic stuff in Volndí a Zanra (Old Sanhr) (106 lines)
     From: Peter Ara Guekguezian <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:13:53 -0700

10. TECH: Sound-Change Rules Syntax
    • TECH: Sound-Change Rules Syntax (45 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:31:48 -0400
    • Re: TECH: Sound-Change Rules Syntax (49 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 22:05:25 +0200
    • Re: TECH: Sound-Change Rules Syntax (60 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 17:07:36 -0400

11. Theory: Conlangs?
    • Re: Theory: Conlangs? (57 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:52:13 -0400
    • Re: Theory: Conlangs? (71 lines)
      From: Douglas Treadwell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 01:06:16 -0700

12. Theory: Required Reading?
    • Re: Theory: Required Reading? (58 lines)
      From: David G. Durand <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 09:28:12 -0400
    • Re: Theory: Required Reading? (65 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 16:52:27 +0200
    • Re: Theory: Required Reading? (44 lines)
      From: Wayne Chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 10:10:50 -0700
    • Re: Theory: Required Reading? (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 14:09:28 -0400
    • Re: Theory: Required Reading? (38 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 13:18:38 +0200

13. Weekly Vocab #2.1.23 (repost #1)
    • Weekly Vocab #2.1.23 (repost #1) (88 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 06:01:01 +0200