Conlang Mailing List – June 2007, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show contributor list | Hide contributor list

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

List of contributors:

• Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• ryan beaton <[log in to unmask]>
• Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]> (5 messages)
• Rik <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]> (4 messages)
• Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <[log in to unmask]>
• Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• [log in to unmask] (12 messages)
• Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]> (11 messages)
• John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
• John H. Chalmers <[log in to unmask]>
• Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
• Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]> (3 messages)
• Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
• H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
• Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
• David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
• Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
• Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
• caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]> (2 messages)
• Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
• And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

1. Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Polysemy (44 lines)
     Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 15:10:15 -0700
   • Re: Polysemy (90 lines)
     Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:33:39 -0700

2. ryan beaton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Constructed maps (66 lines)
     Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:15:34 -0700

3. Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt; or, Polysemy revisited (48 lines)
     Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:25:37 -0400
   • Re: languages in reverse (93 lines)
     Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:12:24 -0400
   • Re: languages in reverse (62 lines)
     Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 00:59:25 -0400
   • Re: languages in reverse (75 lines)
     Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:58:52 -0400
   • Re: Constructed maps (66 lines)
     Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:35:06 -0400

4. Rik <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Constructed maps (80 lines)
     Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:37:42 +0100
   • CHAT: Constructed maps (45 lines)
     Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:18:24 +0100

5. Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (47 lines)
     Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:39:58 +0200
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (40 lines)
     Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:37:40 +0200
   • Re: languages in reverse (60 lines)
     Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:45:12 +0200
   • Re: languages in reverse (33 lines)
     Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:34:43 +0200

6. Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Constructed maps (36 lines)
     Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:55:56 -0500

7. Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (57 lines)
     Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:08:28 -0400
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (46 lines)
     Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:29:57 -0400

8. [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Polysemy (34 lines)
     Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:59:05 EDT
   • Re: Polysemy (44 lines)
     Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 07:34:10 EDT
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (43 lines)
     Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:38:17 EDT
   • Re: languages in reverse (41 lines)
     Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:30:01 EDT
   • Re: languages in reverse (35 lines)
     Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:19:57 EDT
   • Re: languages in reverse (48 lines)
     Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:18:05 EDT
   • Re: languages in reverse (38 lines)
     Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:26:39 EDT
   • Re: languages in reverse (58 lines)
     Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:17:38 EDT
   • Re: languages in reverse (34 lines)
     Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 23:59:14 EDT
   • Re: languages in reverse (42 lines)
     Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 17:21:19 EDT
   • Re: languages in reverse (36 lines)
     Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 16:38:55 EDT
   • languages in reverse (27 lines)
     Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 09:29:03 EDT

9. Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Polysemy (41 lines)
     Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:54:24 -0400
   • Re: Polysemy (41 lines)
     Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:48:22 -0400
   • Re: Polysemy (66 lines)
     Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:56:58 -0400
   • Re: Mir ist kalt; or, Polysemy revisited (52 lines)
     Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:33:31 -0400
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (51 lines)
     Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:54:05 -0400
   • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (57 lines)
     Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:46:16 -0400
   • Re: languages in reverse (40 lines)
     Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 10:41:55 -0400
   • Re: languages in reverse (38 lines)
     Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 09:26:31 -0400
   • Re: languages in reverse (51 lines)
     Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:23:48 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Constructed maps (48 lines)
     Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:36:17 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: Constructed maps (72 lines)
     Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:25:05 -0400

10. John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Sligh Site Redesign (39 lines)
      Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 03:46:43 -0400

11. John H. Chalmers <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CONLANG Digest - 15 Jun 2007 to 16 Jun 2007 (#2007-167) (40 lines)
      Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 09:37:09 -0700

12. Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (63 lines)
      Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:27:34 +0100
    • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (61 lines)
      Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:25:22 +0100
    • Re: CHAT: Constructed maps (33 lines)
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:27:22 +0100

13. Isaac Penzev <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Polysemy (50 lines)
      Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:01:03 +0300

14. Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: languages in reverse (34 lines)
      Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:39:44 -0500
    • Re: languages in reverse (49 lines)
      Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:15:30 -0500
    • Re: languages in reverse (42 lines)
      Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:37:21 -0500

15. Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Weekly Vocab #2.1.25 (repost #1) (87 lines)
      Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 06:01:01 +0200

16. H. S. Teoh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Polysemy (62 lines)
      Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:58:51 -0700
    • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (69 lines)
      Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:40:45 -0700

17. Elliott Lash <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (53 lines)
      Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:17:34 -0700

18. Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (32 lines)
      Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:51:14 +0000

19. David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Constructed maps (53 lines)
      Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:28:52 -0700

20. Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: languages in reverse (36 lines)
      Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:24:33 -0400

21. Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (44 lines)
      Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:24:02 +0200

22. caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Fwd: Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (44 lines)
      Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:10:31 -0000
    • Fwd: Re: languages in reverse (41 lines)
      Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:04:30 -0000

23. Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Mir ist kalt -- How to analyze this sentence? (46 lines)
      Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:39:54 +0200

24. And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: CHAT: Constructed maps (54 lines)
      Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:03:41 +0100