Conlang
Mailing List – July 2007, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
2nd Language Creation Conference - arrival &c on Friday
(2 messages)
CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(14 messages)
CHAT: Histo ry of «ir»
CHAT: History of «ir»
(12 messages)
CHAT: History of «ir»
(2 messages)
CHAT: Re: Conblogging
(3 messages)
Conblogging
(19 messages)
Deciphering Conlangs
digraphs
(3 messages)
digraphs (was: Rhotics)
(10 messages)
Doing without relative, coordinate and subordinate clauses?
(2 messages)
Edible and Drinkable Pronouns?
(5 messages)
Hurray! Old Albic has 1000 words!
(5 messages)
I'm back, aargh
Inverse case?
(4 messages)
Irrealis conditionals in GSF
Karnuugaan phonology
LCC2 is almost here - new location, webcast, and requests for help
(2 messages)
LCC2 live
LCC2 shirts
No Vowels?
(7 messages)
Orthographic challenges
(13 messages)
OT: Re: Orthographic challenges
(9 messages)
phonology of Plan B
(2 messages)
Phonology of Velian
(3 messages)
Phonology^WOrthography of Velian
Phonotactics of Velian I, or: Phonology of Velian II: The Wrath of John Vertical ;-)
(9 messages)
Poll: What looks best?
(23 messages)
Restricted clusters?
(7 messages)
Rhotics
(3 messages)
Rhotics (was: Poll: What looks best?)
(8 messages)
Sound Change Applier?
(5 messages)
The 2007 Smiley Award Winner: Teonaht
(11 messages)
Vn pronouns I
(2 messages)
Weekly Vocab #2.1.29 (repost #1)
Wrathful Dispersionism IRL.. :'-(
2nd Language Creation Conference - arrival &c on Friday
Re: 2nd Language Creation Conference - arrival &c on Friday
(43 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 2nd Language Creation Conference - arrival &c on Friday
(83 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(33 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(27 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(47 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(30 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(33 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(52 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(46 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(34 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(33 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(49 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: English is SO HARD, even the English can't speak it
(52 lines)
From:
Wesley Parish <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Histo ry of «ir»
Re: CHAT: Histo ry of «ir»
(50 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: History of «ir»
CHAT: History of «ir»
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: History of «ir»
(56 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: History of «ir»
(59 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: History of «ir»
(67 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: History of «ir»
(74 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: History of «ir»
(96 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: History of «ir»
(98 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: History of «ir»
(56 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: History of «ir»
(73 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: History of «ir»
(70 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: History of «ir»
(83 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: History of «ir»
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: History of «ir»
Re: CHAT: History of «ir»
(134 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: History of «ir»
(87 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: Re: Conblogging
CHAT: Re: Conblogging
(77 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: Conblogging
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CHAT: Re: Conblogging
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conblogging
Conblogging
(39 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(59 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(52 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(59 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(66 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(39 lines)
From:
Ollock Ackeop <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(46 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(46 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(69 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(40 lines)
From:
Ollock Ackeop <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(72 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(47 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(49 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(58 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conblogging
(57 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Deciphering Conlangs
Re: Deciphering Conlangs
(104 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
digraphs
Re: digraphs
(45 lines)
From:
T. A. McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: digraphs
(54 lines)
From:
T. A. McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: digraphs
(78 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
digraphs (was: Rhotics)
digraphs (was: Rhotics)
(103 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: digraphs (was: Rhotics)
(116 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: digraphs (was: Rhotics)
(132 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: digraphs (was: Rhotics)
(71 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: digraphs (was: Rhotics)
(88 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: digraphs (was: Rhotics)
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: digraphs (was: Rhotics)
(56 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: digraphs (was: Rhotics)
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: digraphs (was: Rhotics)
(61 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: digraphs (was: Rhotics)
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Doing without relative, coordinate and subordinate clauses?
Re: Doing without relative, coordinate and subordinate clauses?
(49 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Doing without relative, coordinate and subordinate clauses?
(70 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Edible and Drinkable Pronouns?
Re: Edible and Drinkable Pronouns?
(75 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Edible and Drinkable Pronouns?
(51 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Edible and Drinkable Pronouns?
(50 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Edible and Drinkable Pronouns?
(78 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Edible and Drinkable Pronouns?
(51 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Hurray! Old Albic has 1000 words!
Hurray! Old Albic has 1000 words!
(35 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hurray! Old Albic has 1000 words!
(30 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hurray! Old Albic has 1000 words!
(50 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hurray! Old Albic has 1000 words!
(43 lines)
From:
Ollock Ackeop <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hurray! Old Albic has 1000 words!
(41 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
I'm back, aargh
Re: I'm back, aargh
(29 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Inverse case?
Inverse case?
(58 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inverse case?
(51 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inverse case?
(61 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Inverse case?
(81 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Irrealis conditionals in GSF
Irrealis conditionals in GSF
(95 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Karnuugaan phonology
Karnuugaan phonology
(139 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
LCC2 is almost here - new location, webcast, and requests for help
Re: LCC2 is almost here - new location, webcast, and requests for help
(21 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: LCC2 is almost here - new location, webcast, and requests for help
(57 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
LCC2 live
LCC2 live
(29 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
LCC2 shirts
LCC2 shirts
(29 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
No Vowels?
Re: No Vowels?
(137 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No Vowels?
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: No Vowels?
(195 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No Vowels?
(155 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No Vowels?
(185 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No Vowels?
(165 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: No Vowels?
(160 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Orthographic challenges
Orthographic challenges
(111 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic challenges
(139 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic challenges
(150 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic challenges
(80 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic challenges
(56 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic challenges
(51 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic challenges
(70 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic challenges
(83 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic challenges
(69 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic challenges
(60 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic challenges
(68 lines)
From:
T. A. McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic challenges
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Orthographic challenges
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Orthographic challenges
OT: Re: Orthographic challenges
(94 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Orthographic challenges
(61 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Orthographic challenges
(39 lines)
From:
Abel Chiaro <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Orthographic challenges
(62 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Orthographic challenges
(77 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Orthographic challenges
(62 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: Orthographic challenges
(64 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Orthographic challenges
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Re: Orthographic challenges
(56 lines)
From:
Abel Chiaro <
[log in to unmask]
>
phonology of Plan B
phonology of Plan B
(64 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: phonology of Plan B
(76 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonology of Velian
Phonology of Velian
(100 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology of Velian
(45 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology of Velian
(60 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonology^WOrthography of Velian
Re: Phonology^WOrthography of Velian
(113 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonotactics of Velian I, or: Phonology of Velian II: The Wrath of John Vertical ;-)
Phonotactics of Velian I, or: Phonology of Velian II: The Wrath of John Vertical ;-)
(61 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonotactics of Velian I, or: Phonology of Velian II: The Wrath of John Vertical ;-)
(75 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonotactics of Velian I, or: Phonology of Velian II: The Wrath of John Vertical ;-)
(104 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonotactics of Velian I, or: Phonology of Velian II: The Wrath of John Vertical ;-)
(40 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonotactics of Velian I, or: Phonology of Velian II: The Wrath of John Vertical ;-)
(40 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonotactics of Velian I, or: Phonology of Velian II: The Wrath of John Vertical ;-)
(56 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonotactics of Velian I, or: Phonology of Velian II: The Wrath of John Vertical ;-)
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonotactics of Velian I, or: Phonology of Velian II: The Wrath of John Vertical ;-)
(74 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonotactics of Velian I, or: Phonology of Velian II: The Wrath of John Vertical ;-)
(111 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Poll: What looks best?
Poll: What looks best?
(66 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(36 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(28 lines)
From:
Falcata Lusa <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(36 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(29 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(64 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(41 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(81 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(40 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(49 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(35 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(40 lines)
From:
T. A. McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(44 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(52 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(48 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(51 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(62 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(74 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(113 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(123 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Poll: What looks best?
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Restricted clusters?
Restricted clusters?
(89 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Restricted clusters?
(77 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Restricted clusters?
(74 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Restricted clusters?
(126 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Restricted clusters?
(171 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Restricted clusters?
(44 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Restricted clusters?
(85 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rhotics
Re: Rhotics
(104 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhotics
(133 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhotics
(67 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Rhotics (was: Poll: What looks best?)
Rhotics (was: Poll: What looks best?)
(54 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhotics (was: Poll: What looks best?)
(52 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhotics (was: Poll: What looks best?)
(49 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhotics (was: Poll: What looks best?)
(56 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhotics (was: Poll: What looks best?)
(61 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhotics (was: Poll: What looks best?)
(21 lines)
From:
Ollock Ackeop <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhotics (was: Poll: What looks best?)
(51 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Rhotics (was: Poll: What looks best?)
(52 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sound Change Applier?
Sound Change Applier?
(34 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound Change Applier?
(51 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound Change Applier?
(43 lines)
From:
T. A. McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound Change Applier?
(54 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound Change Applier?
(55 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
The 2007 Smiley Award Winner: Teonaht
The 2007 Smiley Award Winner: Teonaht
(61 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The 2007 Smiley Award Winner: Teonaht
(49 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The 2007 Smiley Award Winner: Teonaht
(57 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The 2007 Smiley Award Winner: Teonaht
(67 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The 2007 Smiley Award Winner: Teonaht
(41 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The 2007 Smiley Award Winner: Teonaht
(88 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The 2007 Smiley Award Winner: Teonaht
(101 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The 2007 Smiley Award Winner: Teonaht
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The 2007 Smiley Award Winner: Teonaht
(130 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The 2007 Smiley Award Winner: Teonaht
(151 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The 2007 Smiley Award Winner: Teonaht
(78 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vn pronouns I
Vn pronouns I
(88 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vn pronouns I
(43 lines)
From:
Jeff Rollin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Weekly Vocab #2.1.29 (repost #1)
Weekly Vocab #2.1.29 (repost #1)
(84 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Wrathful Dispersionism IRL.. :'-(
Wrathful Dispersionism IRL.. :'-(
(28 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – July 2007, week 1
Conlang Mailing List – July 2007, week 1
