Conlang
Mailing List September 2007, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(14 messages)
Auto presentatzioni/Self-introduction
(4 messages)
Autumnal weekly vocab
(2 messages)
Borrowing from your cousins (was Re: electronyms)
(3 messages)
chashmal
(2 messages)
Chauk Mölkarharsaup Öftölöraup lü Péaz! (was: Re: Auto presentatzioni/Sel. ..
(2 messages)
Chauk Mölkarharsaup Öftölöraup lü Péaz! (was: Re: Auto presentatzioni/Self-introduction)
Die Grammatik der Sprache Lingwa de Planeta (LdP)
(10 messages)
electronyms
(10 messages)
electronyms (was: Greek plurals)
(7 messages)
Finlaesk Redux, part I
Fwd: Positioning for emphasis
Fwd: Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
gmail question (was: La Karavano in Esperanto with relex)
(2 messages)
Greek plurals
(16 messages)
Greek plurals (was: OT Plectrums)
(2 messages)
Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(20 messages)
La Karavano in Esperanto with relex
(7 messages)
Musical terms (Was: Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help))
(9 messages)
OT Plectrums (Re: Fwd: Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo)
(4 messages)
OT strummin' on the old banjo
(20 messages)
Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help)
Positioning for emphasis
(12 messages)
Radio Rejumona
(14 messages)
Tense and aspect
THEORY: Progressive voicing assimilation
(3 messages)
Yes
1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(51 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: 1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(29 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: 1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(36 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: 1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(63 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: 1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(33 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(73 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: 1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(55 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: 1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(31 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: 1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: 1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(28 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: 1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(66 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: 1st paragraph of La Karavano with relex
(56 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Auto presentatzioni/Self-introduction
Re: Auto presentatzioni/Self-introduction
(84 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Auto presentatzioni/Self-introduction
(40 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Auto presentatzioni/Self-introduction
(36 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Auto presentatzioni/Self-introduction
(58 lines)
From:
Thomas Leigh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Autumnal weekly vocab
Autumnal weekly vocab
(88 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Autumnal weekly vocab
(145 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Borrowing from your cousins (was Re: electronyms)
Borrowing from your cousins (was Re: electronyms)
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Borrowing from your cousins (was Re: electronyms)
(46 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Borrowing from your cousins (was Re: electronyms)
(57 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
chashmal
Re: chashmal
(106 lines)
From:
Dr. Peter E. Tarlow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: chashmal
(91 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chauk Mölkarharsaup Öftölöraup lü Péaz! (was: Re: Auto presentatzioni/Sel. ..
Re: Chauk Mölkarharsaup Öftölöraup lü Péaz! (was: Re: Auto presentatzioni/Sel. ..
(32 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Chauk Mölkarharsaup Öftölöraup lü Péaz! (was: Re: Auto presentatzioni/Sel. ..
(35 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chauk Mölkarharsaup Öftölöraup lü Péaz! (was: Re: Auto presentatzioni/Self-introduction)
Re: Chauk Mölkarharsaup Öftölöraup lü Péaz! (was: Re: Auto presentatzioni/Self-introduction)
(61 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Die Grammatik der Sprache Lingwa de Planeta (LdP)
Die Grammatik der Sprache Lingwa de Planeta (LdP)
(44 lines)
From:
Dmitry Ivanov <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die Grammatik der Sprache Lingwa de Planeta (LdP)
(54 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die Grammatik der Sprache Lingwa de Planeta (LdP)
(43 lines)
From:
lingwadeplaneta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die Grammatik der Sprache Lingwa de Planeta (LdP)
(55 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die Grammatik der Sprache Lingwa de Planeta (LdP)
(77 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die Grammatik der Sprache Lingwa de Planeta (LdP)
(60 lines)
From:
lingwadeplaneta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die Grammatik der Sprache Lingwa de Planeta (LdP)
(40 lines)
From:
lingwadeplaneta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die Grammatik der Sprache Lingwa de Planeta (LdP)
(57 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die Grammatik der Sprache Lingwa de Planeta (LdP)
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Die Grammatik der Sprache Lingwa de Planeta (LdP)
(37 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
electronyms
Re: electronyms
(75 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: electronyms
(64 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: electronyms
(30 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: electronyms
(29 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: electronyms
(37 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: electronyms
(70 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: electronyms
(50 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: electronyms
(63 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: electronyms
(81 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: electronyms
(50 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
electronyms (was: Greek plurals)
electronyms (was: Greek plurals)
(97 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: electronyms (was: Greek plurals)
(41 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: electronyms (was: Greek plurals)
(37 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: electronyms (was: Greek plurals)
(52 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: electronyms (was: Greek plurals)
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: electronyms (was: Greek plurals)
(42 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: electronyms (was: Greek plurals)
(37 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Finlaesk Redux, part I
Finlaesk Redux, part I
(75 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: Positioning for emphasis
Fwd: Positioning for emphasis
(169 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Fwd: Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
Fwd: Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(43 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
gmail question (was: La Karavano in Esperanto with relex)
Re: gmail question (was: La Karavano in Esperanto with relex)
(39 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: gmail question (was: La Karavano in Esperanto with relex)
(55 lines)
From:
Paul Bennett <
[log in to unmask]
>
Greek plurals
Re: Greek plurals
(66 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals
(59 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals
(38 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Greek plurals
(53 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals
(42 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals
(60 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals
(40 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals
(39 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals
(59 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals
(48 lines)
From:
Wayne Chevrier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals
(34 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Greek plurals
(57 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Greek plurals (was: OT Plectrums)
Greek plurals (was: OT Plectrums)
(57 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Greek plurals (was: OT Plectrums)
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Interesting article about conlangs and the law
Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(48 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(73 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(54 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(71 lines)
From:
Tristan Plumb <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(54 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(31 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(73 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(32 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(74 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(64 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(47 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(41 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(81 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(45 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(44 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(33 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(44 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Interesting article about conlangs and the law
(97 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
La Karavano in Esperanto with relex
La Karavano in Esperanto with relex
(30 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: La Karavano in Esperanto with relex
(41 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: La Karavano in Esperanto with relex
(37 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: La Karavano in Esperanto with relex
(39 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: La Karavano in Esperanto with relex
(41 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: La Karavano in Esperanto with relex
(64 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: La Karavano in Esperanto with relex
(41 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Musical terms (Was: Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help))
Re: Musical terms (Was: Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help))
(84 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical terms (Was: Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help))
(74 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical terms (Was: Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help))
(78 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical terms (Was: Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help))
(96 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical terms (Was: Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help))
(34 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical terms (Was: Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help))
(61 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical terms (Was: Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help))
(117 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical terms (Was: Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help))
(48 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Musical terms (Was: Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help))
(106 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Plectrums (Re: Fwd: Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo)
OT Plectrums (Re: Fwd: Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo)
(59 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Plectrums (Re: Fwd: Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo)
(35 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Plectrums (Re: Fwd: Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo)
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Plectrums (Re: Fwd: Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo)
(43 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT strummin' on the old banjo
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(75 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(44 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(62 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(44 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(43 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(38 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(33 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(35 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(37 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(33 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(28 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(29 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(50 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(51 lines)
From:
JR <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(39 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT strummin' on the old banjo
(53 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help)
Re: Playing the banjo (Was: Latin help)
(34 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Positioning for emphasis
Positioning for emphasis
(39 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Positioning for emphasis
(55 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Positioning for emphasis
(40 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Positioning for emphasis
(39 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Positioning for emphasis
(65 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Positioning for emphasis
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Positioning for emphasis
(51 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Positioning for emphasis
(74 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Positioning for emphasis
(38 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Positioning for emphasis
(44 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Positioning for emphasis
(114 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Positioning for emphasis
(68 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Radio Rejumona
Radio Rejumona
(77 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Radio Rejumona
(43 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Radio Rejumona
(51 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Radio Rejumona
(60 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Radio Rejumona
(43 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Radio Rejumona
(46 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Radio Rejumona
(43 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Radio Rejumona
(52 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Radio Rejumona
(80 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Radio Rejumona
(49 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Radio Rejumona
(37 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Radio Rejumona
(41 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Radio Rejumona
(60 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Radio Rejumona
(62 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tense and aspect
Re: Tense and aspect
(52 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Progressive voicing assimilation
THEORY: Progressive voicing assimilation
(34 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Progressive voicing assimilation
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Progressive voicing assimilation
(61 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Yes
Re: Yes
(45 lines)
From:
Dr. Peter E. Tarlow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU