Conlang
Mailing List October 2007, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Aesthetics
(46 messages)
Animal noises
(4 messages)
Another wikipedia deletion: Kēlen
(8 messages)
beginnings of Prevli
(2 messages)
Conlang Flag on WikiCommons
EAK - a further update
(2 messages)
EAK - further thoughts on verbs
future Englishes
(6 messages)
Géarthnuns Pronunication Guide (was Re Translating 'Imagine' (( Code-switching in music))
Géarthnuns Pronunication Guid e (was Re Translating 'Imagine' (( Code-switc hing in music))
How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(16 messages)
Idiom Du Jour
(6 messages)
Kennaway conlang page (was: Re: [CONLANG] How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(5 messages)
Kennaway conlang page (was: Re: [CONLANG] How did you find out that there...
(2 messages)
LCC1&2 website back up (WAS: An other wikipedia deletion: Kēlen)
Low German and Dutch (was Re: Aesthetics)
MNCL5 Numbers
(5 messages)
Nouns, they hate me!
Nuu (udikeyes's conlang)
Old Albic update: Syntax of the verbal noun
(5 messages)
Our Beholders (was Aesthetics)
(2 messages)
Presenting Mayuc: phonlogy question
Prevli: a question
(3 messages)
Salishan nounlessness
(2 messages)
Some weird verbs in Ayeri
(3 messages)
Swedish conlangers: what can we do with conlang.se?
(4 messages)
Terkunan revision (adding a lot of Rhodrese)
(2 messages)
THEORY: Why more than two grammatical relations?
(7 messages)
Translating "Imagine"
Types of Compounds
(5 messages)
Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(20 messages)
Your dictionary online?
[OT] Photoshop/Gimp skills?
Aesthetics
Aesthetics
(53 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(98 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(74 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(168 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(44 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(98 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(79 lines)
From:
Petr Mejzlík <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(98 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(79 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Aesthetics
(63 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(38 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(136 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(149 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(52 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(92 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(123 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(45 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(23 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(23 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(24 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(98 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(90 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(65 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(85 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(64 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(46 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(62 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(44 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(80 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(114 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(98 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(74 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(49 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(86 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(127 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(34 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(48 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(75 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(103 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(146 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(35 lines)
From:
Leo Moser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(43 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(76 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(35 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Aesthetics
(42 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Animal noises
Re: Animal noises
(42 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal noises
(48 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal noises
(51 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Animal noises
(58 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Another wikipedia deletion: Kēlen
Another wikipedia deletion: Kēlen
(53 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another wikipedia deletion: Kēlen
(73 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another wikipedia deletion: Kēlen
(85 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another wikipedia deletion: Kēlen
(32 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another wikipedia deletion: Kēlen
(34 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another wikipedia deletion: Kēlen
(69 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another wikipedia deletion: Kēlen
(82 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Another wikipedia deletion: Kēlen
(92 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
beginnings of Prevli
beginnings of Prevli
(76 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: beginnings of Prevli
(107 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Conlang Flag on WikiCommons
Conlang Flag on WikiCommons
(41 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
EAK - a further update
EAK - a further update
(47 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: EAK - a further update
(44 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
EAK - further thoughts on verbs
EAK - further thoughts on verbs
(55 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
future Englishes
future Englishes
(37 lines)
From:
Michael Erard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: future Englishes
(40 lines)
From:
Rik <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: future Englishes
(53 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: future Englishes
(61 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: future Englishes
(57 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: future Englishes
(56 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Géarthnuns Pronunication Guide (was Re Translating 'Imagine' (( Code-switching in music))
Re: Géarthnuns Pronunication Guide (was Re Translating 'Imagine' (( Code-switching in music))
(97 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Géarthnuns Pronunication Guid e (was Re Translating 'Imagine' (( Code-switc hing in music))
Re: Géarthnuns Pronunication Guid e (was Re Translating 'Imagine' (( Code-switc hing in music))
(105 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(79 lines)
From:
Michael Potter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(59 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(38 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(53 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(60 lines)
From:
Elyse M. Grasso <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(44 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(35 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(72 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(40 lines)
From:
B Garcia <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(31 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(50 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(40 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(67 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(54 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(107 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(78 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Idiom Du Jour
Idiom Du Jour
(58 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Idiom Du Jour
(70 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Idiom Du Jour
(98 lines)
From:
Geoff Horswood <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Idiom Du Jour
(36 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Idiom Du Jour
(83 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Idiom Du Jour
(58 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kennaway conlang page (was: Re: [CONLANG] How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
Kennaway conlang page (was: Re: [CONLANG] How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(47 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kennaway conlang page (was: Re: [CONLANG] How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(75 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kennaway conlang page (was: Re: [CONLANG] How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(39 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kennaway conlang page (was: Re: [CONLANG] How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(59 lines)
From:
Richard Kennaway <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kennaway conlang page (was: Re: [CONLANG] How did you find out that there were other conlangers?
(79 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kennaway conlang page (was: Re: [CONLANG] How did you find out that there...
Re: Kennaway conlang page (was: Re: [CONLANG] How did you find out that there...
(33 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Kennaway conlang page (was: Re: [CONLANG] How did you find out that there...
(69 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
LCC1&2 website back up (WAS: An other wikipedia deletion: Kēlen)
LCC1&2 website back up (WAS: An other wikipedia deletion: Kēlen)
(42 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Low German and Dutch (was Re: Aesthetics)
Low German and Dutch (was Re: Aesthetics)
(51 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
MNCL5 Numbers
MNCL5 Numbers
(51 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: MNCL5 Numbers
(41 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: MNCL5 Numbers
(49 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: MNCL5 Numbers
(57 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: MNCL5 Numbers
(63 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nouns, they hate me!
Re: Nouns, they hate me!
(99 lines)
From:
Mia Soderquist <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nuu (udikeyes's conlang)
Nuu (udikeyes's conlang)
(26 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Old Albic update: Syntax of the verbal noun
Old Albic update: Syntax of the verbal noun
(141 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Albic update: Syntax of the verbal noun
(255 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Albic update: Syntax of the verbal noun
(336 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Albic update: Syntax of the verbal noun
(108 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Old Albic update: Syntax of the verbal noun
(47 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Our Beholders (was Aesthetics)
Our Beholders (was Aesthetics)
(38 lines)
From:
Leo Moser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Our Beholders (was Aesthetics)
(97 lines)
From:
Leo Moser <
[log in to unmask]
>
Presenting Mayuc: phonlogy question
Re: Presenting Mayuc: phonlogy question
(81 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Prevli: a question
Re: Prevli: a question
(54 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Prevli: a question
(137 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Prevli: a question
(88 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Salishan nounlessness
Salishan nounlessness
(29 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Salishan nounlessness
(70 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Some weird verbs in Ayeri
Re: Some weird verbs in Ayeri
(37 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some weird verbs in Ayeri
(56 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Some weird verbs in Ayeri
(74 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Swedish conlangers: what can we do with conlang.se?
Swedish conlangers: what can we do with conlang.se?
(62 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Swedish conlangers: what can we do with conlang.se?
(54 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Swedish conlangers: what can we do with conlang.se?
(61 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Swedish conlangers: what can we do with conlang.se?
(45 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
Terkunan revision (adding a lot of Rhodrese)
Re: Terkunan revision (adding a lot of Rhodrese)
(518 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terkunan revision (adding a lot of Rhodrese)
(176 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Why more than two grammatical relations?
Re: THEORY: Why more than two grammatical relations?
(113 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Why more than two grammatical relations?
(37 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Why more than two grammatical relations?
(22 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Why more than two grammatical relations?
(42 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Why more than two grammatical relations?
(62 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Why more than two grammatical relations?
(52 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Why more than two grammatical relations?
(38 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translating "Imagine"
Re: Translating "Imagine"
(107 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Types of Compounds
Types of Compounds
(26 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Types of Compounds
(44 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Types of Compounds
(48 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Types of Compounds
(35 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Types of Compounds
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(55 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(39 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(61 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(43 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(54 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(42 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(42 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(88 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(131 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(76 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(80 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(129 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(289 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(48 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(69 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(56 lines)
From:
Kelly Drinkwater <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(86 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(97 lines)
From:
Kelly Drinkwater <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Words for relationships that don't have good analogues in English
(82 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Your dictionary online?
Re: Your dictionary online?
(65 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
[OT] Photoshop/Gimp skills?
[OT] Photoshop/Gimp skills?
(40 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU