Conlang Mailing List – November 2007, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• An auction of Interlingua materials
• Another conlang card game
• Babel story (partial) in Prevli (3 messages)
• Bootstrapping a cooperative conlang - red
• building from primitives (was Re: Langauge Constets) (6 messages)
• Cat phonemes (10 messages)
• FWD Youth without youth (2 messages)
• Hello (6 messages)
• Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (25 messages)
• MNCL5 Morphosyntax (3 messages)
• MNCL5 Phonology and Orthography (2 messages)
• My website (4 messages)
• No plural morpheme (28 messages)
• OT: Vista (< MNCL5 Phonology and Orthography)
• two-symbol mathematics (was: Langauge Constets (was: NSM)) (2 messages)
• two-symbol mathematics (was: Languuge Contest (was: NSM))
• [Fwd: Dark Roasted Blend: Retro-Future: To The Stars!] (5 messages)

1. An auction of Interlingua materials
   • An auction of Interlingua materials (54 lines)
     From: Richard Kennaway <[log in to unmask]>

2. Another conlang card game
   • Another conlang card game (29 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

3. Babel story (partial) in Prevli
   • Re: Babel story (partial) in Prevli (101 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Babel story (partial) in Prevli (137 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Babel story (partial) in Prevli (149 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

4. Bootstrapping a cooperative conlang - red
   • Re: Bootstrapping a cooperative conlang - red (80 lines)
     From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>

5. building from primitives (was Re: Langauge Constets)
   • Re: building from primitives (was Re: Langauge Constets) (58 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: building from primitives (was Re: Langauge Constets) (79 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: building from primitives (was Re: Langauge Constets) (112 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: building from primitives (was Re: Langauge Constets) (95 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: building from primitives (was Re: Langauge Constets) (56 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: building from primitives (was Re: Langauge Constets) (50 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>

6. Cat phonemes
   • Re: Cat phonemes (38 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cat phonemes (39 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cat phonemes (47 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Cat phonemes (45 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Cat phonemes (38 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cat phonemes (47 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cat phonemes (62 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cat phonemes (37 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Cat phonemes (90 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Cat phonemes (43 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

7. FWD Youth without youth
   • Re: FWD Youth without youth (52 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: FWD Youth without youth (64 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

8. Hello
   • Re: Hello (74 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hello (44 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Hello (48 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hello (44 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hello (76 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Hello (33 lines)
     From: Mr Veoler <[log in to unmask]>

9. Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage)
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (55 lines)
     From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (45 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (42 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (57 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (40 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (34 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (36 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (36 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (43 lines)
     From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (38 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (50 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (53 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (44 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (49 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (37 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (39 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (38 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (35 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (39 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (54 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (40 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (79 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (33 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (90 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Langauge Constets (was Natural Semantic Metalanguage) (80 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

10. MNCL5 Morphosyntax
    • MNCL5 Morphosyntax (36 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: MNCL5 Morphosyntax (49 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: MNCL5 Morphosyntax (46 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

11. MNCL5 Phonology and Orthography
    • Re: MNCL5 Phonology and Orthography (49 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: MNCL5 Phonology and Orthography (61 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

12. My website
    • Re: My website (44 lines)
      From: Mr Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My website (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My website (37 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: My website (37 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]

13. No plural morpheme
    • No plural morpheme (43 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (55 lines)
      From: Chris Rettstatt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (47 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (58 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (111 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (49 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (41 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (41 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (51 lines)
      From: Pope Salmon the Lesser Mungojelly <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (61 lines)
      From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (68 lines)
      From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (45 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: No plural morpheme (42 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (44 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: No plural morpheme (58 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (38 lines)
      From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (61 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (48 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (41 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (42 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (47 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (53 lines)
      From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (51 lines)
      From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (50 lines)
      From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (54 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (50 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (43 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: No plural morpheme (32 lines)
      From: Leo Moser <[log in to unmask]>

14. OT: Vista (< MNCL5 Phonology and Orthography)
    • Re: OT: Vista (< MNCL5 Phonology and Orthography) (48 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]

15. two-symbol mathematics (was: Langauge Constets (was: NSM))
    • Re: two-symbol mathematics (was: Langauge Constets (was: NSM)) (49 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: two-symbol mathematics (was: Langauge Constets (was: NSM)) (43 lines)
      From: Tristan Plumb <[log in to unmask]>

16. two-symbol mathematics (was: Languuge Contest (was: NSM))
    • Re: two-symbol mathematics (was: Languuge Contest (was: NSM)) (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]

17. [Fwd: Dark Roasted Blend: Retro-Future: To The Stars!]
    • [Fwd: Dark Roasted Blend: Retro-Future: To The Stars!] (26 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Fwd: Dark Roasted Blend: Retro-Future: To The Stars!] (25 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Fwd: Dark Roasted Blend: Retro-Future: To The Stars!] (51 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Fwd: Dark Roasted Blend: Retro-Future: To The Stars!] (38 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [Fwd: Dark Roasted Blend: Retro-Future: To The Stars!] (52 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>