Conlang Mailing List – December 2007, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Burma" (no longer Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement)
• "can" "able to" mood
• Conlang Christmas (4 messages)
• i cant seem to understand mora (5 messages)
• Justifying a stress pattern (11 messages)
• Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (15 messages)
• MNCL5 really long
• More MNCL5 Problems
• OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (2 messages)
• OT: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (4 messages)
• Sylvester & Bleigiessen (2 messages)
• your opinion (10 messages)

1. "Burma" (no longer Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement)
   • "Burma" (no longer Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement) (74 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

2. "can" "able to" mood
   • Re: "can" "able to" mood (61 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

3. Conlang Christmas
   • Re: Conlang Christmas (56 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Christmas (41 lines)
     From: Wayne Chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Christmas (50 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Christmas (60 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

4. i cant seem to understand mora
   • i cant seem to understand mora (22 lines)
     From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: i cant seem to understand mora (69 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: i cant seem to understand mora (23 lines)
     From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: i cant seem to understand mora (79 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: i cant seem to understand mora (41 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

5. Justifying a stress pattern
   • Justifying a stress pattern (66 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (90 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (47 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (51 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (102 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (88 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (47 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (82 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (50 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (56 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (43 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

6. Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates)
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (56 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (64 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (108 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (48 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (63 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (42 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (41 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (123 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (54 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (83 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (28 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (38 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (45 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (91 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (47 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

7. MNCL5 really long
   • Re: MNCL5 really long (172 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

8. More MNCL5 Problems
   • More MNCL5 Problems (67 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

9. OT: Latin subject-verb agreement
   • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (68 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (52 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

10. OT: Sylvester & Bleigiessen
    • OT: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (38 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (54 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (53 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (36 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

11. Sylvester & Bleigiessen
    • Re: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (45 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

12. your opinion
    • your opinion (22 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: your opinion (20 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: your opinion (44 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: your opinion (37 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: your opinion (23 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: your opinion (35 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: your opinion (40 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: your opinion (56 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: your opinion (33 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: your opinion (62 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>