Conlang Mailing List – December 2007, week 5

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Burma" (no longer Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement)
• "can" "able to" mood
• Conlang Christmas (4 messages)
• i cant seem to understand mora (5 messages)
• Justifying a stress pattern (11 messages)
• Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (15 messages)
• MNCL5 really long
• More MNCL5 Problems
• OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (2 messages)
• OT: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (4 messages)
• Sylvester & Bleigiessen (2 messages)
• your opinion (10 messages)

1. "Burma" (no longer Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement)
   • "Burma" (no longer Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement) (74 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:17:50 -0500

2. "can" "able to" mood
   • Re: "can" "able to" mood (61 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:46:44 +0100

3. Conlang Christmas
   • Re: Conlang Christmas (60 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 04:25:15 +0100
   • Re: Conlang Christmas (50 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:54:41 +0100
   • Re: Conlang Christmas (41 lines)
     From: Wayne Chevrier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:16:45 -0800
   • Re: Conlang Christmas (56 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:19:51 +0100

4. i cant seem to understand mora
   • Re: i cant seem to understand mora (41 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 04:36:59 +0100
   • Re: i cant seem to understand mora (79 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:46:36 -0500
   • Re: i cant seem to understand mora (23 lines)
     From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:02:56 -0500
   • Re: i cant seem to understand mora (69 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:14:17 -0700
   • i cant seem to understand mora (22 lines)
     From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:32:34 -0500

5. Justifying a stress pattern
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (43 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:28:45 +0100
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (56 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:18:29 +0100
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (50 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:11:36 +0100
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (82 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:10:57 +0000
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (47 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:30:59 EST
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (88 lines)
     From: David Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:17:36 -0800
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (102 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:17:14 -0700
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (51 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 01:13:47 +0800
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (47 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:42:51 +0100
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (90 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:20:00 +0800
   • Justifying a stress pattern (66 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:17:36 +0100

6. Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates)
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (47 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:29:08 +1100
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (91 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:25:50 -0500
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (45 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:53:24 EST
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (38 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:44:04 +0800
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (28 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:01:07 EST
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (83 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:04:51 +1100
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (54 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:01:06 +0100
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (123 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:42:20 -0600
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (41 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:05:13 -0000
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (42 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:11:21 +0100
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (63 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 13:49:58 -0500
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (48 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:22:54 +0800
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (108 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:19:31 -0700
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (64 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:22:18 -0500
   • Re: Justifying a stress pattern (plus OT: joke last name templates) (56 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 23:28:13 -0600

7. MNCL5 really long
   • Re: MNCL5 really long (172 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 09:01:47 -0500

8. More MNCL5 Problems
   • More MNCL5 Problems (67 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 08:27:05 -0500

9. OT: Latin subject-verb agreement
   • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (52 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:31:26 EST
   • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (68 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:41:50 +0100

10. OT: Sylvester & Bleigiessen
    • Re: OT: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (36 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:33:26 -0500
    • Re: OT: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (53 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:36:46 -0500
    • Re: OT: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (54 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 10:40:05 +1300
    • OT: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (38 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:41:08 -0000

11. Sylvester & Bleigiessen
    • Re: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:27:29 -0500
    • Re: Sylvester & Bleigiessen (45 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:34:22 +0100

12. your opinion
    • Re: your opinion (62 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 05:03:52 +0100
    • Re: your opinion (33 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:50:25 -0500
    • Re: your opinion (56 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:14:23 -0500
    • Re: your opinion (40 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:11:15 -0500
    • Re: your opinion (35 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:02:39 -0500
    • Re: your opinion (23 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:56:55 -0500
    • Re: your opinion (37 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:38:22 -0500
    • Re: your opinion (44 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:02:16 +0100
    • Re: your opinion (20 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:49:19 -0500
    • your opinion (22 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:45:40 -0500