Conlang Mailing List – December 2007, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (31 messages)
• About Asking for Action
• aliens! (5 messages)
• Ayuh (was: OT: English and front rounded vowels) (2 messages)
• Causative/Benefactive Interaction (2 messages)
• Changes
• Frappr map of conlangers (7 messages)
• Fwd: Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels
• Idiom of the week (2 messages)
• Latin subject-verb agreement (2 messages)
• OT: /x\/
• OT: /x\/ (was: English and front rounded vowels) (6 messages)
• OT: English and front rounded vowels (14 messages)
• OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (49 messages)
• OT: Re: cyphers (2 messages)
• OT: Re: cyphers (was: aliens!) (3 messages)
• OT: What If Gmail Had Been Designed by Microsoft? (2 messages)
• Phonosemantics (4 messages)
• Problem with Tense (3 messages)
• Question about consonants in English (3 messages)
• question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (25 messages)
• What If Gmail Had Been Designed by Microsoft?
• Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels) (11 messages)
• YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (32 messages)
• YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels)) (4 messages)
• [YAEPT] Question about consonants in English (2 messages)

1. (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible?
   • (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (45 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:30:28 +0100
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (52 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:58:24 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (38 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:18:51 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (50 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:30:26 -0000
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (37 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:03:53 +0100
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (64 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:06:21 +0100
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (47 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:08:58 +0100
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (45 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:19:52 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (50 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:32:20 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (43 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:28:35 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (43 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:50:26 -0000
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (35 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:33:15 -0800
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (66 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:58:50 +1100
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (48 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:48:54 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (51 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:20:41 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (44 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:41:59 -0800
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (62 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:53:37 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (46 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:32:05 EST
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (43 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:45:12 EST
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (47 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:22:07 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (43 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:40:03 +0100
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (61 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:32:37 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (44 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:23:26 -0000
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (41 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:47:56 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (37 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:54:10 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (46 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:01:55 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (52 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:21:28 -0000
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (41 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:30:06 -0000
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (58 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:02:23 -0000
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (47 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:39:25 -0500
   • Re: (YAEPT?) Pattern exemplifying as many vowel phonemes as possible? (54 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:13:23 -0000

2. About Asking for Action
   • About Asking for Action (73 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:36:54 -0500

3. aliens!
   • Re: aliens! (53 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 09:52:56 +0100
   • Re: aliens! (96 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 16:35:42 +0100
   • Re: aliens! (61 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 13:49:54 -0500
   • Re: aliens! (36 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 20:22:35 +0100
   • Re: aliens! (35 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 23:50:04 +0100

4. Ayuh (was: OT: English and front rounded vowels)
   • Re: Ayuh (was: OT: English and front rounded vowels) (46 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:38:42 +0000
   • Re: Ayuh (was: OT: English and front rounded vowels) (46 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:16:24 -0500

5. Causative/Benefactive Interaction
   • Causative/Benefactive Interaction (60 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:16:03 -0500
   • Re: Causative/Benefactive Interaction (49 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:36:39 EST

6. Changes
   • Re: Changes (42 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 12:44:21 +0100

7. Frappr map of conlangers
   • Frappr map of conlangers (31 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:57:28 -0800
   • Re: Frappr map of conlangers (43 lines)
     From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:09:59 -0500
   • Re: Frappr map of conlangers (36 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:43:46 -0800
   • Re: Frappr map of conlangers (28 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:15:49 -0500
   • Re: Frappr map of conlangers (32 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:32:18 EST
   • Re: Frappr map of conlangers (45 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:29:02 -0500
   • Re: Frappr map of conlangers (36 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:13:25 -0500

8. Fwd: Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels
   • Fwd: Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (44 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:07:38 -0000

9. Idiom of the week
   • Idiom of the week (60 lines)
     From: Geoff Horswood <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 14:47:37 +0000
   • Re: Idiom of the week (81 lines)
     From: John Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 17:00:11 -0400

10. Latin subject-verb agreement
    • Re: Latin subject-verb agreement (39 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:57:09 -0500
    • Re: Latin subject-verb agreement (41 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:22:42 EST

11. OT: /x\/
    • Re: OT: /x\/ (64 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:51:33 +0000

12. OT: /x\/ (was: English and front rounded vowels)
    • Re: OT: /x\/ (was: English and front rounded vowels) (55 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:43:28 -0500
    • Re: OT: /x\/ (was: English and front rounded vowels) (60 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:20:18 +0100
    • Re: OT: /x\/ (was: English and front rounded vowels) (67 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:20:43 -0500
    • Re: OT: /x\/ (was: English and front rounded vowels) (123 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:42:52 +0100
    • Re: OT: /x\/ (was: English and front rounded vowels) (44 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:59:27 -0500
    • Re: OT: /x\/ (was: English and front rounded vowels) (44 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:19:48 +0100

13. OT: English and front rounded vowels
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (58 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 00:47:20 -0600
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (169 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 17:04:53 +0200
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (35 lines)
      From: Mr Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:17:17 +0100
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (66 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:43:44 +0100
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (32 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:39:44 -0500
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (59 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:04:58 +1100
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (49 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:21:10 -0500
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (57 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:05:04 -0500
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (35 lines)
      From: Mr Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:40:40 +0100
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (41 lines)
      From: B Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:13:31 -0800
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:56:11 -0500
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (48 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:40:30 +0100
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (49 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:44:27 +0100
    • Re: OT: English and front rounded vowels (59 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:33:51 -0600

14. OT: Latin subject-verb agreement
    • OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (26 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:06:28 EST
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (37 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:18:48 +0100
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:54:40 -0500
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (48 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:55:00 -0000
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (34 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:31:26 -0500
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (43 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:23:25 EST
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (47 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:34:44 EST
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:16:51 -0500
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:25:14 EST
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (57 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 17:30:13 -0800
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (73 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:55:06 +1100
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:05:15 EST
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (51 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:19:45 +1100
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (65 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:45:19 +0000
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (79 lines)
      From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:32:34 +0000
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (89 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:23:42 -0500
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (100 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:27:18 -0500
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (54 lines)
      From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:37:23 +0000
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (43 lines)
      From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:37:38 +0000
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (69 lines)
      From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:43:37 +0000
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (58 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:48:02 -0500
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (65 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:39:25 -0000
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (78 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:58:49 -0500
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (85 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:17:30 -0000
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (40 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:24:33 -0000
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (54 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 09:55:31 -0500
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (60 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:26:50 -0000
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (41 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:32:55 -0500
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (60 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:41:07 +0100
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (54 lines)
      From: Jeff Rollin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:47:13 +0000
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (37 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:00:19 +0100
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:01:25 +0100
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (52 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:07:41 +0100
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (35 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:23:52 -0500
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (60 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:11:19 -0500
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (64 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:51:27 -0600
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (45 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:46:41 -0000
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (57 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:09:27 EST
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:29:06 EST
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:45:39 EST
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (37 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:06:48 -0800
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (53 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:08:06 +1100
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (56 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:24:43 +1100
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (52 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:39:18 -0800
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:22:55 -0500
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (48 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:33:02 -0500
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (35 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:32:22 EST
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (56 lines)
      From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:55:28 -0200
    • Re: OT: Latin subject-verb agreement (46 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:22:55 +0100

15. OT: Re: cyphers
    • Re: OT: Re: cyphers (92 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:43:39 +0100
    • Re: OT: Re: cyphers (108 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:40:26 -0500

16. OT: Re: cyphers (was: aliens!)
    • OT: Re: cyphers (was: aliens!) (53 lines)
      From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 19:45:49 +0000
    • Re: OT: Re: cyphers (was: aliens!) (74 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 20:25:40 -0500
    • Re: OT: Re: cyphers (was: aliens!) (56 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:47:18 -0500

17. OT: What If Gmail Had Been Designed by Microsoft?
    • OT: What If Gmail Had Been Designed by Microsoft? (25 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:28:42 +0100
    • Re: OT: What If Gmail Had Been Designed by Microsoft? (33 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:09:31 -0500

18. Phonosemantics
    • Phonosemantics (31 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 20:42:25 -0500
    • Re: Phonosemantics (47 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:35:17 -0500
    • Re: Phonosemantics (52 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:45:45 -0500
    • Re: Phonosemantics (43 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 20:54:50 -0800

19. Problem with Tense
    • Problem with Tense (47 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 18:17:14 -0500
    • Re: Problem with Tense (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:51:35 +0100
    • Re: Problem with Tense (41 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:24:06 -0500

20. Question about consonants in English
    • Question about consonants in English (52 lines)
      From: Geijss Streijde <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:48:45 +0100
    • Re: Question about consonants in English (59 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:04:25 -0800
    • Re: Question about consonants in English (49 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:07:29 EST

21. question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect.
    • question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (23 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:38:26 -0500
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (54 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:27:17 -0500
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:31:55 +0100
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:34:18 -0500
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (22 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:40:07 -0500
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (77 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:43:23 -0800
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (63 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:13:23 -0500
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (44 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:30:33 +0100
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (71 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:46:09 -0800
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (38 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:19:56 -0500
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (44 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:13:58 -0500
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (38 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:16:41 -0500
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (114 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:40:04 -0600
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (44 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:42:25 -0600
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (76 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:58:52 +1100
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (29 lines)
      From: Reilly Schlaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:06:31 -0500
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (108 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:25:24 -0800
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (51 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:18:52 -0500
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (45 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:32:16 -0800
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (39 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:19:42 +0100
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (50 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:12:08 -0500
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (89 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:40:22 +0100
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (57 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:24:13 -0500
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (50 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:45:44 +0000
    • Re: question on vowel tensing, fronting, backing, ect. (65 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:11:43 -0500

22. What If Gmail Had Been Designed by Microsoft?
    • Re: What If Gmail Had Been Designed by Microsoft? (36 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:40:03 -0500

23. Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels)
    • Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels) (48 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:28:58 -0500
    • Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels) (47 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:10:57 -0500
    • Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels) (62 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:24:19 +1100
    • Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels) (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:58:43 -0500
    • Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels) (56 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:20:27 -0500
    • Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels) (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:41:53 -0500
    • Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels) (45 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:50:26 -0500
    • Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels) (56 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:46:21 -0600
    • Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels) (52 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:23:56 -0500
    • Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels) (64 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:42:05 -0500
    • Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels) (29 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:09:18 -0500

24. YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a...
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (35 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:16:34 EST
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:25:23 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (45 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:42:06 +1100
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (41 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:02:31 -0800
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (69 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:17:19 +1100
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (92 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:23:51 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (35 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:32:13 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (67 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:40:34 -0800
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (79 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:59:10 +1100
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (82 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:59:24 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (43 lines)
      From: Gary Shannon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:38:08 -0800
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (44 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:02:53 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (39 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:57:29 +0100
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (34 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:57:29 +0100
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (69 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:46:38 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (45 lines)
      From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:55:59 -0600
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (56 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:10:08 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (72 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:12:27 +1100
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (43 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:31:27 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (61 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:41:40 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (41 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:44:11 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (63 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:45:13 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (112 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:10:00 +1100
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (92 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:22:48 +1100
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (74 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:35:03 +1100
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (43 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:00:34 +0100
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:14:52 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (53 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:26:13 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (42 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:32:20 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (69 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:25:54 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (139 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:46:09 +0100
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English a... (87 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:22:52 -0500

25. YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels))
    • YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels)) (98 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:08:10 +1100
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels)) (92 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:36:36 +0000
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels)) (50 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:02:52 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: English low vowels (was briefly: Re: Y/N variants (< OT: English and front rounded vowels)) (63 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 08:46:20 +0000

26. [YAEPT] Question about consonants in English
    • Re: [YAEPT] Question about consonants in English (84 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:14:45 -0800
    • Re: [YAEPT] Question about consonants in English (92 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:05:58 -0500