Conlang Mailing List – February 2008, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Research Language"? (9 messages)
• Conlang Books - Reviews & Recommendations (3 messages)
• Damanhur language
• Evolution of Romance (was: **Answer to Pete**) (5 messages)
• Fwd: CSUR help (3 messages)
• OT: Free Rice (was Vivitne haec tabella?) (10 messages)
• Radical-Metathesis (9 messages)
• TECH: Unicode Private Use Area (5 messages)
• Tengwar font (was Tengwar question (6 messages)
• Vivitne haec tabella? (19 messages)
• WHAT calendar for the current year 2012 (4 messages)
• What happened to the CSUR? (< TECH: Unicode Private Use Area) (7 messages)

1. "Research Language"?
   • "Research Language"? (39 lines)
     From: Kelly Drinkwater <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Research Language"? (24 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Research Language"? (21 lines)
     From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Research Language"? (52 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Research Language"? (30 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Research Language"? (33 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: "Research Language"? (35 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: "Research Language"? (30 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: "Research Language"? (45 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

2. Conlang Books - Reviews & Recommendations
   • Re: Conlang Books - Reviews & Recommendations (217 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Books - Reviews & Recommendations (62 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Conlang Books - Reviews & Recommendations (36 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

3. Damanhur language
   • Damanhur language (29 lines)
     From: Krista Casada <[log in to unmask]>

4. Evolution of Romance (was: **Answer to Pete**)
   • Re: Evolution of Romance (was: **Answer to Pete**) (71 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Evolution of Romance (was: **Answer to Pete**) (119 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Evolution of Romance (was: **Answer to Pete**) (58 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Evolution of Romance (was: **Answer to Pete**) (121 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Evolution of Romance (was: **Answer to Pete**) (127 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

5. Fwd: CSUR help
   • Fwd: CSUR help (73 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Fwd: CSUR help (75 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Fwd: CSUR help (37 lines)
     From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

6. OT: Free Rice (was Vivitne haec tabella?)
   • OT: Free Rice (was Vivitne haec tabella?) (45 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Free Rice (was Vivitne haec tabella?) (48 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Free Rice (was Vivitne haec tabella?) (48 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Free Rice (was Vivitne haec tabella?) (31 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Free Rice (was Vivitne haec tabella?) (55 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Free Rice (was Vivitne haec tabella?) (39 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Free Rice (was Vivitne haec tabella?) (59 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Free Rice (was Vivitne haec tabella?) (67 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Free Rice (was Vivitne haec tabella?) (41 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: OT: Free Rice (was Vivitne haec tabella?) (60 lines)
     From: Paul Schleitwiler, FCM <[log in to unmask]>

7. Radical-Metathesis
   • Radical-Metathesis (38 lines)
     From: Mr Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Radical-Metathesis (63 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Radical-Metathesis (76 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Radical-Metathesis (42 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Radical-Metathesis (51 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Radical-Metathesis (104 lines)
     From: Mr Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Radical-Metathesis (37 lines)
     From: Mr Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Radical-Metathesis (55 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Radical-Metathesis (47 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>

8. TECH: Unicode Private Use Area
   • TECH: Unicode Private Use Area (74 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: TECH: Unicode Private Use Area (203 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: TECH: Unicode Private Use Area (73 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: TECH: Unicode Private Use Area (74 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: TECH: Unicode Private Use Area (69 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

9. Tengwar font (was Tengwar question
   • Tengwar font (was Tengwar question (32 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Tengwar font (was Tengwar question (40 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Tengwar font (was Tengwar question (35 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Tengwar font (was Tengwar question (31 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Tengwar font (was Tengwar question (38 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Tengwar font (was Tengwar question (53 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

10. Vivitne haec tabella?
    • Vivitne haec tabella? (26 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (38 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (38 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (30 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (44 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (41 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (30 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (60 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (45 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (36 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (35 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (42 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (40 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (36 lines)
      From: Mia Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (40 lines)
      From: Mia Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (28 lines)
      From: Larry Sulky <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (25 lines)
      From: Ollock Ackeop <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (46 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Vivitne haec tabella? (33 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

11. WHAT calendar for the current year 2012
    • Re: WHAT calendar for the current year 2012 (292 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHAT calendar for the current year 2012 (86 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHAT calendar for the current year 2012 (56 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: WHAT calendar for the current year 2012 (63 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

12. What happened to the CSUR? (< TECH: Unicode Private Use Area)
    • What happened to the CSUR? (< TECH: Unicode Private Use Area) (82 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: What happened to the CSUR? (< TECH: Unicode Private Use Area) (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What happened to the CSUR? (< TECH: Unicode Private Use Area) (42 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What happened to the CSUR? (< TECH: Unicode Private Use Area) (51 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What happened to the CSUR? (< TECH: Unicode Private Use Area) (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: What happened to the CSUR? (< TECH: Unicode Private Use Area) (51 lines)
      From: Rebecca Bettencourt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What happened to the CSUR? (< TECH: Unicode Private Use Area) (53 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]