Conlang Mailing List – February 2008, week 4

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

1. Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/ (41 lines)
   From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

2. Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/ (51 lines)
   From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

3. Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/ (71 lines)
   From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

4. Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/ (41 lines)
   From: [log in to unmask]

5. Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/ (40 lines)
   From: [log in to unmask]

6. Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/ (35 lines)
   From: [log in to unmask]

7. Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/ (58 lines)
   From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

8. Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/ (48 lines)
   From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

9. Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/ (69 lines)
   From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

10. Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/ (57 lines)
    From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

11. Re: [Slaviconlang] Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/ (109 lines)
    From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

12. Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/ (36 lines)
    From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

13. Ablaut and Infix Origins (28 lines)
    From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

14. syntax book recommendations? (22 lines)
    From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

15. Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins (49 lines)
    From: Edgard Bikelis <[log in to unmask]>

16. Re: syntax book recommendations? (45 lines)
    From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

17. Re: syntax book recommendations? (27 lines)
    From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

18. computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (24 lines)
    From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

19. Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins (74 lines)
    From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

20. Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins (83 lines)
    From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

21. Re: syntax book recommendations? (82 lines)
    From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

22. Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (31 lines)
    From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

23. Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins (217 lines)
    From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>

24. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (51 lines)
    From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

25. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (57 lines)
    From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

26. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (58 lines)
    From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

27. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (51 lines)
    From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

28. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (88 lines)
    From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>

29. Re: TRANS: Borges (fi: conlanging and journaling) (66 lines)
    From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>

30. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (49 lines)
    From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

31. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (49 lines)
    From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

32. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (50 lines)
    From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

33. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (54 lines)
    From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

34. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (46 lines)
    From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

35. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (40 lines)
    From: [log in to unmask]

36. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (75 lines)
    From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

37. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (41 lines)
    From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

38. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (77 lines)
    From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

39. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (28 lines)
    From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

40. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (51 lines)
    From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

41. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (30 lines)
    From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

42. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (63 lines)
    From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

43. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (53 lines)
    From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

44. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (65 lines)
    From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

45. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (45 lines)
    From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

46. Sound Change With Labialized Consonant Codas (49 lines)
    From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

47. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (70 lines)
    From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

48. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (39 lines)
    From: [log in to unmask]

49. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (78 lines)
    From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

50. Re: Sound Change With Labialized Consonant Codas (52 lines)
    From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

51. Bandrika language in Hitchcock's The Lady Vanishes (50 lines)
    From: Fredrik Ekman <[log in to unmask]>

52. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (95 lines)
    From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

53. Re: Sound Change With Labialized Consonant Codas (78 lines)
    From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

54. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (41 lines)
    From: [log in to unmask]

55. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (28 lines)
    From: [log in to unmask]

56. Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins (38 lines)
    From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

57. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (51 lines)
    From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

58. conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (48 lines)
    From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>

59. Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (69 lines)
    From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

60. Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins (119 lines)
    From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

61. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (65 lines)
    From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

62. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (86 lines)
    From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

63. Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (57 lines)
    From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

64. "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (98 lines)
    From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

65. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (56 lines)
    From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>

66. Ordinal (and other numerical) adverbs (126 lines)
    From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

67. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (79 lines)
    From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

68. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (33 lines)
    From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

69. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (54 lines)
    From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

70. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (66 lines)
    From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

71. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (84 lines)
    From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>

72. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (47 lines)
    From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

73. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (34 lines)
    From: John Quijada <[log in to unmask]>

74. Re: Ordinal (and other numerical) adverbs (66 lines)
    From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

75. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Veri... (42 lines)
    From: [log in to unmask]

76. Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (82 lines)
    From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

77. Re: Sound Change With Labialized Consonant Codas (35 lines)
    From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

78. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (67 lines)
    From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

79. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (66 lines)
    From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

80. Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins (62 lines)
    From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

81. Re: Ordinal (and other numerical) adverbs (75 lines)
    From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

82. Re: THEORY: Difthongization across Europe (108 lines)
    From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

83. Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (110 lines)
    From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

84. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (40 lines)
    From: [log in to unmask]

85. Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sour... (37 lines)
    From: [log in to unmask]

86. Re: THEORY: Difthongization across Europe (94 lines)
    From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

87. Conlang Relay (33 lines)
    From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

88. Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (130 lines)
    From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

89. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (44 lines)
    From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

90. Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (57 lines)
    From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>

91. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (93 lines)
    From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

92. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (63 lines)
    From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

93. Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (110 lines)
    From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

94. Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (92 lines)
    From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

95. Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (33 lines)
    From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

96. Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (76 lines)
    From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

97. Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (109 lines)
    From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

98. Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources) (66 lines)
    From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

99. Re: Ordinal (and other numerical) adverbs (107 lines)
    From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

100. Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources) (84 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

101. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (50 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

102. Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (68 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

103. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Veri... (34 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

104. IC1396 (33 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

105. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Veri... (36 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

106. Re: Conlang Relay (46 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

107. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (70 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

108. Re: Conlang Relay (94 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

109. Re: [relay] Conlang Relay (47 lines)
     From: Peter Bleackley <[log in to unmask]>

110. Re: THEORY: Difthongization across Europe (86 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

111. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (39 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

112. Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources) (64 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

113. Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources) (120 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

114. Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources) (37 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

115. Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources) (50 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

116. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (38 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

117. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (28 lines)
     From: Abel Chiaro <[log in to unmask]>

118. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (51 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

119. Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources (68 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

120. Re: Ordinal (and other numerical) adverbs (93 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

121. Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources) (77 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

122. Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources) (31 lines)
     From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

123. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (33 lines)
     From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

124. Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins (218 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

125. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (43 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

126. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (47 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

127. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (50 lines)
     From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>

128. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (43 lines)
     From: Aidan Grey <[log in to unmask]>

129. Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources) (127 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

130. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (42 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

131. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (72 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

132. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (55 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

133. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (60 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

134. Get your own REAL conlang flag (94 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

135. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (51 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

136. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (70 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

137. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (42 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

138. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (35 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

139. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (50 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

140. Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources) (278 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

141. OT: Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (69 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

142. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (56 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

143. Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (67 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]