Conlang
Mailing List February 2008, week 4
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Veri...
(3 messages)
"art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(20 messages)
Ablaut and Infix Origins
(9 messages)
Bandrika language in Hitchcock's The Lady Vanishes
computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(19 messages)
Conlang Relay
(3 messages)
conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sour...
conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(12 messages)
Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
(11 messages)
Get your own REAL conlang flag
IC1396
Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources)
(10 messages)
Ordinal (and other numerical) adverbs
(5 messages)
OT: Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
Sound Change With Labialized Consonant Codas
(4 messages)
syntax book recommendations?
(4 messages)
THEORY: Difthongization across Europe
(3 messages)
TRANS: Borges (fi: conlanging and journaling)
Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(32 messages)
[relay] Conlang Relay
[Slaviconlang] Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
"art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Veri...
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Veri...
(42 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Veri...
(34 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Veri...
(36 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
"art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
"art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(98 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(56 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(79 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(33 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(54 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(84 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(47 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(34 lines)
From:
John Quijada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(67 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(66 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(93 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(63 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(50 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(70 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(39 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(51 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "art", "Art" & anti-Art (was Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(68 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Ablaut and Infix Origins
Ablaut and Infix Origins
(28 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins
(49 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins
(74 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins
(83 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins
(217 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins
(38 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins
(119 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins
(62 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ablaut and Infix Origins
(218 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bandrika language in Hitchcock's The Lady Vanishes
Bandrika language in Hitchcock's The Lady Vanishes
(50 lines)
From:
Fredrik Ekman <
[log in to unmask]
>
computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(24 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(40 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(28 lines)
From:
Abel Chiaro <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(33 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(47 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(50 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(43 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(42 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(72 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(55 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(51 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(70 lines)
From:
T. A. McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(42 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(35 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(50 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(56 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(67 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Conlang Relay
Conlang Relay
(33 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Relay
(46 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Conlang Relay
(94 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sour...
Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sour...
(37 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(48 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(69 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(57 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(82 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(110 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(130 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(57 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(110 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(33 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(76 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(109 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: conlangs as art (was: Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(68 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
(41 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
(51 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
(71 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
(41 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
(40 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
(35 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
(58 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
(48 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
(69 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
(57 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
(36 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Get your own REAL conlang flag
Get your own REAL conlang flag
(94 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
IC1396
IC1396
(33 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources)
Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources)
(66 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources)
(84 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources)
(64 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources)
(120 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources)
(37 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources)
(50 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources)
(77 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources)
(31 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources)
(127 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Langmaker and FrathWiki (was Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources)
(278 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Ordinal (and other numerical) adverbs
Ordinal (and other numerical) adverbs
(126 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ordinal (and other numerical) adverbs
(66 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ordinal (and other numerical) adverbs
(75 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ordinal (and other numerical) adverbs
(107 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Ordinal (and other numerical) adverbs
(93 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
OT: Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
(69 lines)
From:
Tim May <
[log in to unmask]
>
Sound Change With Labialized Consonant Codas
Sound Change With Labialized Consonant Codas
(49 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound Change With Labialized Consonant Codas
(52 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound Change With Labialized Consonant Codas
(78 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sound Change With Labialized Consonant Codas
(35 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
syntax book recommendations?
syntax book recommendations?
(22 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syntax book recommendations?
(45 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syntax book recommendations?
(27 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: syntax book recommendations?
(82 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
THEORY: Difthongization across Europe
Re: THEORY: Difthongization across Europe
(108 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Difthongization across Europe
(94 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Difthongization across Europe
(86 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
TRANS: Borges (fi: conlanging and journaling)
Re: TRANS: Borges (fi: conlanging and journaling)
(66 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(31 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(51 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(57 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(58 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(88 lines)
From:
Jan van Steenbergen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(49 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(49 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(50 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(54 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(46 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(40 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(75 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(41 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(77 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(28 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(51 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(30 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(63 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(53 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(65 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(45 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(70 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(39 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(78 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(95 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(41 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(28 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(51 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(65 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(86 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Wikipedia:Verifiability - Mailing lists as sources
(92 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
[relay] Conlang Relay
Re: [relay] Conlang Relay
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Bleackley <
[log in to unmask]
>
[Slaviconlang] Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
Re: [Slaviconlang] Cyrillic letters for /T/ and /D/
(109 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU