Conlang Mailing List – March 2008, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• A board game of sound changes
• computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (5 messages)
• Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (17 messages)
• Forum to/from email?
• from Cucumis.org: Help: Language equivalences (2 messages)
• How come it's impossible to make a single damn post?! (4 messages)
• linguistlist Summary on reduplication
• MEDIA ADVISORY - Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200809
• Proofreaders for Conlang Exhibit in Cleveland?
• Quenya and other Tolkien's languages' <ss> (3 messages)
• Scandinavian meeting.
• stevo's Unicode hanzi project
• TECH: Forum to/from email? (3 messages)
• TECH: Taking Back CSUR (was Re: Fwd: CSUR help) (5 messages)
• The Ajkrip alphabet (7 messages)
• THEORY: Expanding in translation? (31 messages)
• THEORY: Modal particles in German (6 messages)
• YAEPT: Woman imitates many English accents (7 messages)

1. A board game of sound changes
   • A board game of sound changes (33 lines)
     Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:59:45 -0700

2. computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya
   • Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (55 lines)
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:53:10 -0500
   • Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (40 lines)
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:05:55 -0400
   • Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (50 lines)
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:09:57 +0800
   • Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (48 lines)
     Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:26:58 +0100
   • Re: computer keyboard advertisement mentions Quenya (46 lines)
     Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:28:33 -0400

3. Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question)
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (43 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 23:45:50 -0600
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (71 lines)
     Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:31:12 +1100
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (69 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 22:40:23 -0800
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (98 lines)
     Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 18:01:32 +1100
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (64 lines)
     Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 23:26:03 -0800
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (82 lines)
     Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 18:56:13 +1100
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (57 lines)
     Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 14:57:33 +0100
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (55 lines)
     Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:25:12 -0500
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (87 lines)
     Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 13:40:07 -0500
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (89 lines)
     Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:12:10 -0500
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (122 lines)
     Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 14:20:50 -0800
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (67 lines)
     Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 18:15:47 -0500
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (65 lines)
     Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:44:00 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (44 lines)
     Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:07:52 +0100
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (53 lines)
     Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:10:38 EDT
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (68 lines)
     Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:31:01 -0700
   • Re: Conlang Unicode Font (was Re: Kamakawi Unicode Font Question) (61 lines)
     Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:39:51 +0100

4. Forum to/from email?
   • Re: Forum to/from email? (46 lines)
     Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:12:10 +0100

5. from Cucumis.org: Help: Language equivalences
   • Re: from Cucumis.org: Help: Language equivalences (36 lines)
     Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:26:32 +0100
   • Re: from Cucumis.org: Help: Language equivalences (39 lines)
     Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:21:23 EDT

6. How come it's impossible to make a single damn post?!
   • Re: How come it's impossible to make a single damn post?! (38 lines)
     Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 13:08:16 +0100
   • Re: How come it's impossible to make a single damn post?! (41 lines)
     Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 07:36:56 -0500
   • Re: How come it's impossible to make a single damn post?! (51 lines)
     Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:40:33 +0100
   • Re: How come it's impossible to make a single damn post?! (46 lines)
     Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:15:26 +0100

7. linguistlist Summary on reduplication
   • Re: linguistlist Summary on reduplication (53 lines)
     Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:59:32 -0500

8. MEDIA ADVISORY - Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200809
   • Re: MEDIA ADVISORY - Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200809 (24 lines)
     Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:47:01 -0400

9. Proofreaders for Conlang Exhibit in Cleveland?
   • Proofreaders for Conlang Exhibit in Cleveland? (69 lines)
     Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:19:44 -0700

10. Quenya and other Tolkien's languages' <ss>
    • Quenya and other Tolkien's languages' <ss> (30 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:14:45 +0100
    • Re: Quenya and other Tolkien's languages' <ss> (60 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:07:38 -0000
    • Re: Quenya and other Tolkien's languages' <ss> (49 lines)
      Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:59:40 +0100

11. Scandinavian meeting.
    • Re: Scandinavian meeting. (65 lines)
      Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 15:35:40 +0100

12. stevo's Unicode hanzi project
    • stevo's Unicode hanzi project (134 lines)
      Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:07:11 EDT

13. TECH: Forum to/from email?
    • TECH: Forum to/from email? (30 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:41:50 +0100
    • Re: TECH: Forum to/from email? (40 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:06:20 +0100
    • Re: TECH: Forum to/from email? (43 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:24:16 -0700

14. TECH: Taking Back CSUR (was Re: Fwd: CSUR help)
    • Re: TECH: Taking Back CSUR (was Re: Fwd: CSUR help) (41 lines)
      Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 03:05:59 -0800
    • Re: TECH: Taking Back CSUR (was Re: Fwd: CSUR help) (39 lines)
      Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:20:34 +0100
    • Re: TECH: Taking Back CSUR (was Re: Fwd: CSUR help) (49 lines)
      Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 03:24:53 -0800
    • Re: TECH: Taking Back CSUR (was Re: Fwd: CSUR help) (37 lines)
      Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:50:45 -0500
    • Re: TECH: Taking Back CSUR (was Re: Fwd: CSUR help) (37 lines)
      Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:53:49 EDT

15. The Ajkrip alphabet
    • The Ajkrip alphabet (36 lines)
      Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:12:11 +0100
    • Re: The Ajkrip alphabet (33 lines)
      Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:34:45 -0400
    • Re: The Ajkrip alphabet (58 lines)
      Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:32:51 +0100
    • Re: The Ajkrip alphabet (40 lines)
      Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:11:51 +0200
    • Re: The Ajkrip alphabet (103 lines)
      Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:15:15 +0100
    • Re: The Ajkrip alphabet (46 lines)
      Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:01:35 -0400
    • Re: The Ajkrip alphabet (42 lines)
      Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:40:40 +0100

16. THEORY: Expanding in translation?
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (66 lines)
      Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:15:33 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (49 lines)
      Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:52:37 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (41 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:25:23 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (50 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:46:59 +0000
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (34 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:42:23 EDT
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (58 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:37:25 +1100
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (61 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:57:03 +1300
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (37 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:58:55 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (52 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:21:18 +0000
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (37 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:31:51 EDT
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (59 lines)
      Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:19:39 +1100
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (57 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:55:27 EDT
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (43 lines)
      Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:36:34 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (40 lines)
      Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:31:54 EDT
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (49 lines)
      Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:00:15 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (32 lines)
      Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:26:43 EDT
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (44 lines)
      Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:23:15 +1100
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (75 lines)
      Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:51:38 +0800
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (24 lines)
      Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:11:49 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (40 lines)
      Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:14:47 +0800
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (39 lines)
      Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:11:09 EDT
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (42 lines)
      Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:19:25 +0100
    • THEORY: Expanding in translation? (35 lines)
      Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:03:32 +0000
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (58 lines)
      Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:36:55 +0800
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (51 lines)
      Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:26:35 +1100
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (53 lines)
      Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:44:57 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (48 lines)
      Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:42:37 +0800
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (62 lines)
      Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:00:36 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (72 lines)
      Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:09:09 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (44 lines)
      Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:30:17 -0500
    • Re: THEORY: Expanding in translation? (45 lines)
      Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:36:14 +0100

17. THEORY: Modal particles in German
    • THEORY: Modal particles in German (33 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:27:54 -0400
    • Re: THEORY: Modal particles in German (34 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:45:13 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Modal particles in German (47 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:14:30 EDT
    • Re: THEORY: Modal particles in German (43 lines)
      Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:54:31 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Modal particles in German (52 lines)
      Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:24:53 +0100
    • Re: THEORY: Modal particles in German (42 lines)
      Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:44:46 +0100

18. YAEPT: Woman imitates many English accents
    • Re: YAEPT: Woman imitates many English accents (52 lines)
      Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 14:53:24 +0100
    • Re: YAEPT: Woman imitates many English accents (45 lines)
      Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:30:31 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: Woman imitates many English accents (34 lines)
      Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 13:19:02 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: Woman imitates many English accents (64 lines)
      Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 09:18:15 +1100
    • Re: YAEPT: Woman imitates many English accents (49 lines)
      Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 00:41:22 -0500
    • Re: YAEPT: Woman imitates many English accents (57 lines)
      Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:15:23 -0700
    • Re: YAEPT: Woman imitates many English accents (60 lines)
      Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:27:12 +1300