Conlang Mailing List – April 2008, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• Ago again (was: case system) (4 messages)
• Amazon.com tags and list
• Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows (6 messages)
• case system (13 messages)
• dhokarena grammer (2 messages)
• Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs (9 messages)
• left and right (25 messages)
• linguistics questions
• Name of Pilovese in other languages (3 messages)
• Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (14 messages)
• Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (27 messages)
• Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (13 messages)
• Reduplication in Indonesian (3 messages)
• Romance words for 'small' (was: Pequeno etc) (4 messages)
• Searching the Conlang archive (4 messages)
• Southpaw (was: Re: left and right)
• test, please ignore
• Verb agreement - which is most nifty? (3 messages)
• Whipping into shape for relay. was: Verb agreement - which is most nifty? (2 messages)

1. Ago again (was: case system)
   • Ago again (was: case system) (49 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ago again (was: case system) (34 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Ago again (was: case system) (41 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Ago again (was: case system) (41 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>

2. Amazon.com tags and list
   • Amazon.com tags and list (38 lines)
     From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>

3. Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows
   • Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows (42 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows (49 lines)
     From: Kelly Drinkwater <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows (57 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows (41 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows (28 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows (52 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

4. case system
   • case system (30 lines)
     From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (56 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (70 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (49 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (47 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (69 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (70 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (37 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (39 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (83 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (79 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (78 lines)
     From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (61 lines)
     From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>

5. dhokarena grammer
   • Re: dhokarena grammer (50 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: dhokarena grammer (43 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

6. Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs
   • Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs (85 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs (70 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs (91 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs (57 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs (66 lines)
     From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs (71 lines)
     From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs (40 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs (50 lines)
     From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs (60 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>

7. left and right
   • left and right (26 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: left and right (39 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (45 lines)
     From: JR <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (57 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (65 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (53 lines)
     From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (46 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (44 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: left and right (36 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (36 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (50 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (40 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (55 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (35 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: left and right (37 lines)
     From: Ollock Ackeop <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (54 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (43 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (56 lines)
     From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (35 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: left and right (81 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: left and right (41 lines)
     From: JR <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (56 lines)
     From: Noelle Morris <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (81 lines)
     From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (95 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: left and right (144 lines)
     From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>

8. linguistics questions
   • Re: linguistics questions (69 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>

9. Name of Pilovese in other languages
   • Re: Name of Pilovese in other languages (46 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Name of Pilovese in other languages (58 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Name of Pilovese in other languages (94 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>

10. Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (71 lines)
      From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (57 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (85 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (38 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (78 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (43 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (57 lines)
      From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (62 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (54 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (51 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (91 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (128 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (141 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)] (41 lines)
      From: Mr Veoler <[log in to unmask]>

11. Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)
    • Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (81 lines)
      From: Haggen Kennedy <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (102 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (129 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (77 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (46 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (55 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (38 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (37 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (44 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (41 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (52 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (44 lines)
      From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (56 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (47 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (48 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (61 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (88 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (84 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (66 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (135 lines)
      From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (63 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (70 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (69 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (95 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (60 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (47 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (52 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

12. Pilovese in the Romance Language Family
    • Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (53 lines)
      From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (45 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (60 lines)
      From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (83 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (45 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (43 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (41 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (46 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (76 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (53 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (52 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family (48 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>

13. Reduplication in Indonesian
    • Reduplication in Indonesian (38 lines)
      From: Kelly Drinkwater <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reduplication in Indonesian (59 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Reduplication in Indonesian (26 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>

14. Romance words for 'small' (was: Pequeno etc)
    • Romance words for 'small' (was: Pequeno etc) (210 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Romance words for 'small' (was: Pequeno etc) (35 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Romance words for 'small' (was: Pequeno etc) (50 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Romance words for 'small' (was: Pequeno etc) (62 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

15. Searching the Conlang archive
    • Searching the Conlang archive (46 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Searching the Conlang archive (39 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Searching the Conlang archive (40 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Searching the Conlang archive (53 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

16. Southpaw (was: Re: left and right)
    • Southpaw (was: Re: left and right) (120 lines)
      From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>

17. test, please ignore
    • test, please ignore (27 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

18. Verb agreement - which is most nifty?
    • Verb agreement - which is most nifty? (110 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb agreement - which is most nifty? (35 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Verb agreement - which is most nifty? (38 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>

19. Whipping into shape for relay. was: Verb agreement - which is most nifty?
    • Whipping into shape for relay. was: Verb agreement - which is most nifty? (37 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Whipping into shape for relay. was: Verb agreement - which is most nifty? (47 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>