Conlang Mailing List – April 2008, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "There can be" (38 messages)
• -able (11 messages)
• 12 SAE features (2 messages)
• Amazon.com tags and list
• Amen in Islam (was Re: Going nomail) (3 messages)
• Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows
• Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows corrected and updated
• case system (7 messages)
• ConScript Unicode Registry (3 messages)
• ConScript Unicode Registry ( x: TECH: Unicode 5.1) (3 messages)
• Creating modified keyboards on Windows (4 messages)
• Going nomail (16 messages)
• International Year of Languages
• Jaibi
• MEDIA ADVISORY - Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200814
• OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (28 messages)
• OT: TECH: JavaScript help (3 messages)
• Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (3 messages)
• Standard Average European (was: case system) (23 messages)
• TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs (7 messages)
• TECH: Unicode 5.1 (8 messages)
• TECH: XP command prompt replacement (20 messages)
• Tongue in cheek emoticon? (was: Re: [CONLANG] Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese i...
• Tongue in cheek emoticon? (was: Re: [CONLANG] Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)) (5 messages)
• Weekly Vocab #2.1.29 (repost #1)
• What do you call this suffix? (9 messages)
• YAEGT: 's (was Re: Standard Average European (was: case system)) (10 messages)
• YAEPT: L[a]unt? (8 messages)

1. "There can be"
   • "There can be" (34 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (41 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (59 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (43 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (53 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (47 lines)
     From: Edwin Chen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (51 lines)
     From: Edwin Chen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (43 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (70 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (74 lines)
     From: JR <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (33 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (79 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (42 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (37 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (42 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (55 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (45 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (52 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (41 lines)
     From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (35 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: "There can be" (36 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: "There can be" (44 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (53 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (50 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (49 lines)
     From: Edwin Chen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (42 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (48 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (42 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (40 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (61 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (48 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (44 lines)
     From: Douglas Koller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (36 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (59 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (47 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (61 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (75 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "There can be" (95 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

2. -able
   • -able (30 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: -able (35 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: -able (51 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: -able (58 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: -able (46 lines)
     From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: -able (45 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: -able (37 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: -able (68 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: -able (51 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: -able (62 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: -able (51 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

3. 12 SAE features
   • 12 SAE features (47 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: 12 SAE features (37 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

4. Amazon.com tags and list
   • Re: Amazon.com tags and list (41 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

5. Amen in Islam (was Re: Going nomail)
   • Amen in Islam (was Re: Going nomail) (37 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Amen in Islam (was Re: Going nomail) (41 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Amen in Islam (was Re: Going nomail) (42 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

6. Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows
   • Re: Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows (75 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

7. Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows corrected and updated
   • Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows corrected and updated (36 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

8. case system
   • Re: case system (99 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (152 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (64 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (165 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (137 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (38 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: case system (43 lines)
     From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>

9. ConScript Unicode Registry
   • Re: ConScript Unicode Registry (73 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ConScript Unicode Registry (53 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: ConScript Unicode Registry (60 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

10. ConScript Unicode Registry ( x: TECH: Unicode 5.1)
    • ConScript Unicode Registry ( x: TECH: Unicode 5.1) (129 lines)
      From: Nomad of Norad -- David C Hall <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConScript Unicode Registry ( x: TECH: Unicode 5.1) (62 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: ConScript Unicode Registry ( x: TECH: Unicode 5.1) (70 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

11. Creating modified keyboards on Windows
    • Creating modified keyboards on Windows (191 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Creating modified keyboards on Windows (47 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Creating modified keyboards on Windows (40 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Creating modified keyboards on Windows (39 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

12. Going nomail
    • Going nomail (44 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (60 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (36 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (66 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (64 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (36 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (52 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (83 lines)
      From: Julia Simon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (38 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (35 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (44 lines)
      From: Parker Glynn-Adey <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (47 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (39 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Going nomail (52 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

13. International Year of Languages
    • Re: International Year of Languages (31 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>

14. Jaibi
    • Jaibi (46 lines)
      From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>

15. MEDIA ADVISORY - Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200814
    • MEDIA ADVISORY - Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200814 (63 lines)
      From: Kilean Väsir <[log in to unmask]>

16. OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture
    • OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (51 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (48 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (72 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (40 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (43 lines)
      From: Mia Soderquist <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (38 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (53 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (35 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (44 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (76 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (60 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (45 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (46 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (52 lines)
      From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (36 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (63 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (60 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (44 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (32 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (42 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (60 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (43 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (52 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (49 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (76 lines)
      From: Wesley Parish <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (57 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (67 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: needed: witty facts re: positive aspects of Islamic culture (72 lines)
      From: Hanuman Zhang <[log in to unmask]>

17. OT: TECH: JavaScript help
    • OT: TECH: JavaScript help (30 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: TECH: JavaScript help (48 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: TECH: JavaScript help (77 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

18. Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (67 lines)
      From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (114 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family) (170 lines)
      From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>

19. Standard Average European (was: case system)
    • Standard Average European (was: case system) (50 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (90 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (61 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (72 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (78 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (69 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (55 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (36 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (47 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (47 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (41 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (50 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (47 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (41 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (56 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (75 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (56 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (59 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (44 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (70 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (89 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (55 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (was: case system) (42 lines)
      From: Amanda Babcock Furrow <[log in to unmask]>

20. TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs
    • TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs (74 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs (51 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs (63 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs (73 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs (45 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs (50 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs (37 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

21. TECH: Unicode 5.1
    • TECH: Unicode 5.1 (31 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Unicode 5.1 (52 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Unicode 5.1 (49 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Unicode 5.1 (59 lines)
      From: Rebecca Bettencourt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Unicode 5.1 (57 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Unicode 5.1 (55 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Unicode 5.1 (43 lines)
      From: Rebecca Bettencourt <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: Unicode 5.1 (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

22. TECH: XP command prompt replacement
    • TECH: XP command prompt replacement (30 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (49 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (40 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (56 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (38 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (50 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (39 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (42 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (96 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (118 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (33 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (52 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (50 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (30 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (55 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (49 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (51 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (28 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (37 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TECH: XP command prompt replacement (42 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

23. Tongue in cheek emoticon? (was: Re: [CONLANG] Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese i...
    • Re: Tongue in cheek emoticon? (was: Re: [CONLANG] Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese i... (35 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]

24. Tongue in cheek emoticon? (was: Re: [CONLANG] Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family))
    • Tongue in cheek emoticon? (was: Re: [CONLANG] Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)) (34 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tongue in cheek emoticon? (was: Re: [CONLANG] Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)) (40 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tongue in cheek emoticon? (was: Re: [CONLANG] Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)) (54 lines)
      From: Kelly Drinkwater <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tongue in cheek emoticon? (was: Re: [CONLANG] Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)) (72 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Tongue in cheek emoticon? (was: Re: [CONLANG] Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)) (39 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

25. Weekly Vocab #2.1.29 (repost #1)
    • Re: Weekly Vocab #2.1.29 (repost #1) (153 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

26. What do you call this suffix?
    • What do you call this suffix? (51 lines)
      From: JR <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What do you call this suffix? (51 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What do you call this suffix? (50 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What do you call this suffix? (77 lines)
      From: JR <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What do you call this suffix? (35 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What do you call this suffix? (60 lines)
      From: JR <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What do you call this suffix? (85 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What do you call this suffix? (39 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: What do you call this suffix? (69 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>

27. YAEGT: 's (was Re: Standard Average European (was: case system))
    • YAEGT: 's (was Re: Standard Average European (was: case system)) (54 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEGT: 's (was Re: Standard Average European (was: case system)) (66 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEGT: 's (was Re: Standard Average European (was: case system)) (76 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEGT: 's (was Re: Standard Average European (was: case system)) (59 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEGT: 's (was Re: Standard Average European (was: case system)) (54 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEGT: 's (was Re: Standard Average European (was: case system)) (69 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEGT: 's (was Re: Standard Average European (was: case system)) (87 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEGT: 's (was Re: Standard Average European (was: case system)) (42 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEGT: 's (was Re: Standard Average European (was: case system)) (56 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEGT: 's (was Re: Standard Average European (was: case system)) (62 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

28. YAEPT: L[a]unt?
    • YAEPT: L[a]unt? (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: L[a]unt? (51 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: L[a]unt? (55 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: L[a]unt? (36 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: YAEPT: L[a]unt? (34 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: L[a]unt? (39 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: L[a]unt? (36 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: L[a]unt? (41 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>