Conlang Mailing List – April 2008, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• -able (2 messages)
• Jaibi (2 messages)
• Pilovese Website (6 messages)
• Polysynthetic French (2 messages)
• Polysynthetic French (was: Standard Average European) (3 messages)
• shifting usage of "want" (18 messages)
• spade and shovel (2 messages)
• spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (20 messages)
• spade vs. shovel (4 messages)
• Standard Average European (6 messages)
• TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs
• Uinlitska noises and squiggles (2 messages)
• Usage of "though" (was "want")
• What do you call this suffix?
• YAEGT (2 messages)
• [romconlang] -able (39 messages)

1. -able
   • Re: -able (73 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: -able (63 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

2. Jaibi
   • Re: Jaibi (52 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Jaibi (47 lines)
     From: Christopher Bates <[log in to unmask]>

3. Pilovese Website
   • Pilovese Website (33 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Pilovese Website (47 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Pilovese Website (62 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Pilovese Website (48 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Pilovese Website (61 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Pilovese Website (74 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

4. Polysynthetic French
   • Re: Polysynthetic French (50 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Polysynthetic French (58 lines)
     From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>

5. Polysynthetic French (was: Standard Average European)
   • Polysynthetic French (was: Standard Average European) (49 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Polysynthetic French (was: Standard Average European) (35 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Polysynthetic French (was: Standard Average European) (41 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>

6. shifting usage of "want"
   • shifting usage of "want" (58 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (52 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (90 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (62 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (124 lines)
     From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (37 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (35 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (80 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (57 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (79 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (41 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (55 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (73 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (59 lines)
     From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (58 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (79 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (43 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (49 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>

7. spade and shovel
   • Re: spade and shovel (64 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (43 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

8. spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able)
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (64 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (71 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (56 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (51 lines)
     From: B Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (52 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (67 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (49 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (52 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (72 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (90 lines)
     From: T. A. McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (63 lines)
     From: B Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (42 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (46 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (33 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (47 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (36 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (46 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (119 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (47 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (82 lines)
     From: Tim May <[log in to unmask]>

9. spade vs. shovel
   • spade vs. shovel (38 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: spade vs. shovel (45 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade vs. shovel (53 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: spade vs. shovel (37 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

10. Standard Average European
    • Re: Standard Average European (84 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (84 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (61 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (79 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (68 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Standard Average European (78 lines)
      From: Campbell Nilsen <[log in to unmask]>

11. TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs
    • Re: TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs (45 lines)
      From: Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <[log in to unmask]>

12. Uinlitska noises and squiggles
    • Uinlitska noises and squiggles (89 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Uinlitska noises and squiggles (62 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

13. Usage of "though" (was "want")
    • Re: Usage of "though" (was "want") (32 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>

14. What do you call this suffix?
    • Re: What do you call this suffix? (137 lines)
      From: JR <[log in to unmask]>

15. YAEGT
    • Re: YAEGT (45 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEGT (72 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>

16. [romconlang] -able
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (79 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (41 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (65 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (45 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (53 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (51 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (49 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (73 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (58 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (62 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (72 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (69 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (67 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (64 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (54 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (52 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (75 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (65 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (54 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (59 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (50 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (49 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (61 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (34 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (35 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (51 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (62 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (75 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (38 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (81 lines)
      From: B Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (100 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (56 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (77 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>