Conlang Mailing List – April 2008, week 3

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• -able (2 messages)
• Jaibi (2 messages)
• Pilovese Website (6 messages)
• Polysynthetic French (2 messages)
• Polysynthetic French (was: Standard Average European) (3 messages)
• shifting usage of "want" (18 messages)
• spade and shovel (2 messages)
• spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (20 messages)
• spade vs. shovel (4 messages)
• Standard Average European (6 messages)
• TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs
• Uinlitska noises and squiggles (2 messages)
• Usage of "though" (was "want")
• What do you call this suffix?
• YAEGT (2 messages)
• [romconlang] -able (39 messages)

1. -able
   • Re: -able (73 lines)
     Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:32:09 -0500
   • Re: -able (63 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:00:10 +0200

2. Jaibi
   • Re: Jaibi (52 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:04:20 -0500
   • Re: Jaibi (47 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:55:20 +0100

3. Pilovese Website
   • Pilovese Website (33 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:24:58 -0700
   • Re: Pilovese Website (47 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:28:59 +0200
   • Re: Pilovese Website (62 lines)
     Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:36:07 -0700
   • Re: Pilovese Website (48 lines)
     Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 06:44:07 +0200
   • Re: Pilovese Website (61 lines)
     Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:21:54 -0700
   • Re: Pilovese Website (74 lines)
     Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 13:57:58 +0200

4. Polysynthetic French
   • Re: Polysynthetic French (50 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:58:00 +0200
   • Re: Polysynthetic French (58 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:07:58 +0200

5. Polysynthetic French (was: Standard Average European)
   • Polysynthetic French (was: Standard Average European) (49 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:19:58 +0200
   • Re: Polysynthetic French (was: Standard Average European) (35 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:07:39 -0400
   • Re: Polysynthetic French (was: Standard Average European) (41 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:03:33 -0400

6. shifting usage of "want"
   • shifting usage of "want" (58 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:36:54 +0200
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (52 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:58:02 EDT
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (90 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:36:36 +0200
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (62 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:21:45 -0700
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (124 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:09:06 +0200
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (37 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:18:56 -0400
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (35 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:59:57 -0400
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (80 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:18:40 -0700
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (57 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:28:15 -0400
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (79 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:37:20 -0400
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (41 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:48:49 EDT
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (55 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:23:47 +0200
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (73 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:10:29 -0400
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (59 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:43:46 -0400
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (58 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:35:59 +0200
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (79 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:59:59 +0200
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (43 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:41:09 EDT
   • Re: shifting usage of "want" (49 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:12:18 -0700

7. spade and shovel
   • Re: spade and shovel (64 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:51:13 +0200
   • Re: spade and shovel (43 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:14:58 +0200

8. spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able)
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (64 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:18:24 -0400
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (71 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:46:30 -0400
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (56 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:56:09 -0700
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (51 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:46:47 -0700
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (52 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:46:33 -0400
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (67 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:01:05 -0400
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (49 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:03:15 +1000
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (52 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:06:26 -0400
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (72 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:41:12 -0400
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (90 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:21:50 +1000
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (63 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:34:05 -0700
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (42 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:51:16 -0400
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (46 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:15:01 EDT
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (33 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:21:36 EDT
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (47 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:09:37 -0400
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (36 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:28:12 -0400
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (46 lines)
     Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:24:43 EDT
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (119 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:46:01 +0100
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (47 lines)
     Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:48:13 -0400
   • Re: spade and shovel (was [romconlang] -able) (82 lines)
     Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 01:40:04 +0100

9. spade vs. shovel
   • spade vs. shovel (38 lines)
     Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:45:38 EDT
   • Re: spade vs. shovel (45 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:42:27 +0200
   • Re: spade vs. shovel (53 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:47:19 +0200
   • Re: spade vs. shovel (37 lines)
     Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:55:26 +0200

10. Standard Average European
    • Re: Standard Average European (84 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:33:34 +0200
    • Re: Standard Average European (84 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:10:36 -0400
    • Re: Standard Average European (61 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:01:45 +0200
    • Re: Standard Average European (79 lines)
      Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:08:45 +1000
    • Re: Standard Average European (68 lines)
      Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:40:16 +0200
    • Re: Standard Average European (78 lines)
      Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:37:17 -0700

11. TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs
    • Re: TECH: (-ish) Sound Change Applier programs (45 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:12:40 +0200

12. Uinlitska noises and squiggles
    • Uinlitska noises and squiggles (89 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:26:14 -0400
    • Re: Uinlitska noises and squiggles (62 lines)
      Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 12:53:36 +0200

13. Usage of "though" (was "want")
    • Re: Usage of "though" (was "want") (32 lines)
      Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:52:41 +0100

14. What do you call this suffix?
    • Re: What do you call this suffix? (137 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:55:35 +0300

15. YAEGT
    • Re: YAEGT (45 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:50:57 +0100
    • Re: YAEGT (72 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:11:33 +1000

16. [romconlang] -able
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (79 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:46:22 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (41 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:18:14 +0200
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (51 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:41:31 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (65 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:54:23 +1000
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (45 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:03:23 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (53 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:04:02 +0100
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (51 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:57:34 +0200
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (49 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:32:53 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (73 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:52:25 +0100
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (58 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:22:33 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (37 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:25:59 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (62 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:30:01 -0700
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (72 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:49:45 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (69 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:49:57 +0100
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (67 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:00:08 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (64 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:02:14 -0700
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (54 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:07:27 +0100
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (52 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:12:20 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (48 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:17:46 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (75 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:18:37 -0700
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (65 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:25:46 -0700
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (54 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:42:34 +0100
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (59 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:47:00 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (50 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:51:10 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (49 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:55:40 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (61 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:09:46 -0700
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (34 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:24:25 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (35 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:30:40 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (51 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:35:16 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (62 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:17:12 +0200
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (75 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:03:26 +1000
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (43 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:09:51 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (38 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:12:47 -0400
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (34 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:19:33 EDT
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (81 lines)
      Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:23:19 -0700
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (100 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:36:57 +0800
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (34 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:10:14 EDT
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (56 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:47:51 +0200
    • Re: [romconlang] -able (77 lines)
      Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:56:20 +0200