Conlang
Mailing List – May 2008, week 1
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
Affixes used independently (was preverbs)
(3 messages)
booze words
Bound morphemes becoming independent words (was: Verb-classifiers and preverbs)
Fw: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
Fwd: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
lexical Variation
Major Conlang Exhibit at Cleveland Public Library
(6 messages)
OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(16 messages)
OT: Firewomen
(5 messages)
OT: Firewomen (was [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey)
OT: Icelandic help
(24 messages)
OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(33 messages)
sign language
(8 messages)
Standard Average European
(7 messages)
TECH: Font question
(10 messages)
Terkunan > Trekunan?
(13 messages)
The Road Less Travelled By (was: Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs)
(2 messages)
THEORY: Why more than two grammatical relations?
Translation Challenge: Weird & silly things
Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(24 messages)
[QUESTION] Rounded sibilants?
(3 messages)
[YAEUT] Lexical variation
[YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(78 messages)
Affixes used independently (was preverbs)
Re: Affixes used independently (was preverbs)
(33 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Affixes used independently (was preverbs)
(55 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Affixes used independently (was preverbs)
(54 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
booze words
booze words
(49 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Bound morphemes becoming independent words (was: Verb-classifiers and preverbs)
Bound morphemes becoming independent words (was: Verb-classifiers and preverbs)
(51 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fw: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
Fw: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(75 lines)
From:
Campbell Nilsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Fwd: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
Fwd: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(45 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
lexical Variation
Re: lexical Variation
(221 lines)
From:
John Chalmers <
[log in to unmask]
>
Major Conlang Exhibit at Cleveland Public Library
Major Conlang Exhibit at Cleveland Public Library
(110 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Major Conlang Exhibit at Cleveland Public Library
(133 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Major Conlang Exhibit at Cleveland Public Library
(35 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Major Conlang Exhibit at Cleveland Public Library
(51 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Major Conlang Exhibit at Cleveland Public Library
(141 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Major Conlang Exhibit at Cleveland Public Library
(44 lines)
From:
Donald Boozer <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(34 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(46 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(42 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(61 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(56 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(35 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(61 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(53 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(58 lines)
From:
Kelly Drinkwater <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(75 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(92 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(44 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(71 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT TECH? Open Office vs. MS Word
(83 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Firewomen
Re: OT: Firewomen
(40 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Firewomen
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Firewomen
(74 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Firewomen
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Firewomen
(40 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Firewomen (was [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey)
OT: Firewomen (was [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey)
(45 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Icelandic help
OT: Icelandic help
(43 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(55 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(56 lines)
From:
Edwin Chen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(55 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(64 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(94 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(62 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(93 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(81 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(55 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(74 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(45 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(50 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(50 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(69 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(95 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(66 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(91 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(100 lines)
From:
Edwin Chen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(48 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(53 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(51 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Icelandic help
(58 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(27 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(38 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(37 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(42 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(39 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(46 lines)
From:
Haggen Kennedy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(34 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(42 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(33 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(54 lines)
From:
Haggen Kennedy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(46 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(38 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(43 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(43 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(98 lines)
From:
Haggen Kennedy <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(43 lines)
From:
Carl Banks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(63 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(54 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(37 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(39 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(52 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(60 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(46 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(52 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(44 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(42 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Spanish "me da feliz"
(45 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
sign language
Re: sign language
(47 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sign language
(44 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sign language
(35 lines)
From:
Campbell Nilsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sign language
(45 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sign language
(55 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sign language
(78 lines)
From:
Abrigon Gusiq <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sign language
(33 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: sign language
(44 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Standard Average European
Re: Standard Average European
(49 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Standard Average European
(62 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Standard Average European
(70 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Standard Average European
(81 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Standard Average European
(61 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Standard Average European
(53 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Standard Average European
(89 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: Font question
Re: TECH: Font question
(50 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Font question
(39 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Font question
(46 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Font question
(38 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Font question
(71 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Font question
(46 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Font question
(38 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: TECH: Font question
(43 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Font question
(60 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: Font question
(43 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Terkunan > Trekunan?
Terkunan > Trekunan?
(106 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terkunan > Trekunan?
(125 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terkunan > Trekunan?
(112 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terkunan > Trekunan?
(165 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terkunan > Trekunan?
(60 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terkunan > Trekunan?
(60 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terkunan > Trekunan?
(60 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terkunan > Trekunan?
(106 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terkunan > Trekunan?
(64 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terkunan > Trekunan?
(40 lines)
From:
Amanda Babcock Furrow <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terkunan > Trekunan?
(45 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terkunan > Trekunan?
(59 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Terkunan > Trekunan?
(68 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
The Road Less Travelled By (was: Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs)
The Road Less Travelled By (was: Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs)
(76 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The Road Less Travelled By (was: Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs)
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
THEORY: Why more than two grammatical relations?
Re: THEORY: Why more than two grammatical relations?
(59 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Translation Challenge: Weird & silly things
Translation Challenge: Weird & silly things
(43 lines)
From:
Sai Emrys <
[log in to unmask]
>
Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(62 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(66 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(34 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(45 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(69 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(34 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(61 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(53 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(46 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(52 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(61 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(50 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(78 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(39 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(46 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(42 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(39 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(53 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(45 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(34 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(63 lines)
From:
Carl Banks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(73 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(58 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Verb-classifiers and preverbs.
(40 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
[QUESTION] Rounded sibilants?
Re: [QUESTION] Rounded sibilants?
(74 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] Rounded sibilants?
(35 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [QUESTION] Rounded sibilants?
(63 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
[YAEUT] Lexical variation
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation
(36 lines)
From:
Kelly Drinkwater <
[log in to unmask]
>
[YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
[YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(142 lines)
From:
Kelly Drinkwater <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(216 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(44 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(216 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(140 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(245 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(221 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(253 lines)
From:
JR <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(176 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(52 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(43 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(62 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(56 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(60 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(190 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(170 lines)
From:
Noelle Morris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(234 lines)
From:
andrew <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(51 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(167 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(177 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(80 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(164 lines)
From:
Hanuman Zhang <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(277 lines)
From:
geijss streijde <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(241 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(228 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(48 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(37 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(43 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(143 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(73 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(43 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(80 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(160 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(32 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(42 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(52 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(47 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(43 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(56 lines)
From:
Krista Casada <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(96 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(51 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(64 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(38 lines)
From:
Adam Walker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(78 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(41 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(82 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(44 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(63 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(41 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(49 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(36 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(57 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(54 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(118 lines)
From:
Noelle Morris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(50 lines)
From:
Noelle Morris <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(133 lines)
From:
Douglas Koller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(46 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(44 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(53 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(49 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(63 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(55 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(49 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(101 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(35 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(48 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(37 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(55 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(41 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(40 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(55 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(33 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: [YAEUT] Lexical variation survey
(38 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – May 2008, week 1
Conlang Mailing List – May 2008, week 1
