Conlang Mailing List – June 2008, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "Barely but booleanly" (6 messages)
• "Russian lawn" (4 messages)
• Alborgian/ Borgi
• Another terminology question
• Another Urianian phonology problem. (2 messages)
• Bye for now
• Conlang Flag art links
• Crosswords
• Defending monosexuals (7 messages)
• Defending monosexuals (was: YAEPT: uu/ii )
• Desiring good English to Greek / Greek to English and English to Latin / Latin to English books (2 messages)
• Kamakawi Orthography Page (19 messages)
• Nouns for things that occur in pairs (3 messages)
• OT hypercube (was: Con-other) (6 messages)
• OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (18 messages)
• restricted semantics language (5 messages)
• Restricted semantics language (2 messages)
• restricted semantics language
• Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/? (12 messages)
• [announce] Invented Languages magazine (2 messages)
• [offlist] Kamakawi Orthography Page - typos (2 messages)

1. "Barely but booleanly"
   • "Barely but booleanly" (35 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Barely but booleanly" (44 lines)
     From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Barely but booleanly" (37 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Barely but booleanly" (39 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: "Barely but booleanly" (40 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Barely but booleanly" (64 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>

2. "Russian lawn"
   • "Russian lawn" (32 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: "Russian lawn" (70 lines)
     From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Russian lawn" (53 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: "Russian lawn" (44 lines)
     From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>

3. Alborgian/ Borgi
   • Re: Alborgian/ Borgi (32 lines)
     From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>

4. Another terminology question
   • Re: Another terminology question (95 lines)
     From: JR <[log in to unmask]>

5. Another Urianian phonology problem.
   • Re: Another Urianian phonology problem. (101 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Another Urianian phonology problem. (144 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

6. Bye for now
   • Bye for now (37 lines)
     From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

7. Conlang Flag art links
   • Re: Conlang Flag art links (40 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

8. Crosswords
   • Re: Crosswords (118 lines)
     From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>

9. Defending monosexuals
   • Re: Defending monosexuals (46 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defending monosexuals (59 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defending monosexuals (67 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defending monosexuals (66 lines)
     From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defending monosexuals (27 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defending monosexuals (46 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Defending monosexuals (35 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>

10. Defending monosexuals (was: YAEPT: uu/ii )
    • Re: Defending monosexuals (was: YAEPT: uu/ii ) (116 lines)
      From: GBBS GBBS <[log in to unmask]>

11. Desiring good English to Greek / Greek to English and English to Latin / Latin to English books
    • Re: Desiring good English to Greek / Greek to English and English to Latin / Latin to English books (97 lines)
      From: Nomad of Norad -- David C Hall <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Desiring good English to Greek / Greek to English and English to Latin / Latin to English books (96 lines)
      From: Nomad of Norad -- David C Hall <[log in to unmask]>

12. Kamakawi Orthography Page
    • Kamakawi Orthography Page (39 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (42 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (49 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (71 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (49 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (60 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (32 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (58 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (53 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (36 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (42 lines)
      From: And Rosta <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (38 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (65 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (91 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (116 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (125 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (48 lines)
      From: Ph. D. <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page (50 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>

13. Nouns for things that occur in pairs
    • Re: Nouns for things that occur in pairs (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Nouns for things that occur in pairs (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Nouns for things that occur in pairs (35 lines)
      From: Vladimir Vysotsky <[log in to unmask]>

14. OT hypercube (was: Con-other)
    • Re: OT hypercube (was: Con-other) (54 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT hypercube (was: Con-other) (67 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT hypercube (was: Con-other) (56 lines)
      From: Lars Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT hypercube (was: Con-other) (28 lines)
      From: Donald Boozer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT hypercube (was: Con-other) (71 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT hypercube (was: Con-other) (36 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>

15. OT: Looking for Dutch children's song
    • OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (55 lines)
      From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (68 lines)
      From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (68 lines)
      From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (44 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (44 lines)
      From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (62 lines)
      From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (74 lines)
      From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (40 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (57 lines)
      From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (73 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (41 lines)
      From: René Uittenbogaard <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (44 lines)
      From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (74 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (78 lines)
      From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (110 lines)
      From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (99 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (68 lines)
      From: Chris Peters <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song (75 lines)
      From: Ingmar Roerdinkholder <[log in to unmask]>

16. restricted semantics language
    • restricted semantics language (46 lines)
      From: Nils Schäffer <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: restricted semantics language (46 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: restricted semantics language (41 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
    • Re: restricted semantics language (79 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: restricted semantics language (60 lines)
      From: Nils Schäffer <[log in to unmask]>

17. Restricted semantics language
    • Re: Restricted semantics language (37 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Restricted semantics language (58 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]

18. restricted semantics language
    • Re: restricted semantics language (62 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

19. Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/?
    • Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/? (58 lines)
      From: Paul Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/? (75 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/? (95 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/? (114 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/? (48 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/? (40 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/? (54 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/? (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/? (67 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/? (62 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/? (43 lines)
      From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Which is simpler: /y/ or /iw/? (53 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

20. [announce] Invented Languages magazine
    • Re: [announce] Invented Languages magazine (58 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [announce] Invented Languages magazine (44 lines)
      From: Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]>

21. [offlist] Kamakawi Orthography Page - typos
    • [offlist] Kamakawi Orthography Page - typos (46 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: [offlist] Kamakawi Orthography Page - typos (65 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>