Conlang
Mailing List – June 2008, week 3
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
"to be" or "not to be"
(3 messages)
Bunty.
(12 messages)
Cool phonetic illusion
(11 messages)
Euir news
(2 messages)
Glossopoeia out of (pseudo)glossolalia
(3 messages)
lexicographers (was; Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!
Making your language sound nice
(13 messages)
Monster phonology in need of romanization help
Naive fluent speaker of one's conlang?
(6 messages)
Nevermind, I think I figured it out. (< TECH: OT: Anyone able to get Outlook '03 to properly handle outgoing messages in Unicode/UTF8?)
(5 messages)
not un-/anti-passive
(18 messages)
NUMBERS
(2 messages)
OT Hildegard(e) (was: Naive fluent speaker of one's conlang?)
(2 messages)
Query from another list
restricted semantics language
(7 messages)
TECH: OT: Anyone able to get Outlook '03 to properly handle outgoing messages in Unicode/UTF8?
THEORY: Russian grammar for linguists
(2 messages)
Uriania pages.
(3 messages)
USAGE Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
(5 messages)
USAGE: Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
(6 messages)
"to be" or "not to be"
Re: "to be" or "not to be"
(95 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "to be" or "not to be"
(90 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "to be" or "not to be"
(28 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Bunty.
Bunty.
(45 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bunty.
(52 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bunty.
(67 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bunty.
(78 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bunty.
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bunty.
(63 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bunty.
(42 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bunty.
(134 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bunty.
(45 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bunty.
(54 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bunty.
(51 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Bunty.
(63 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Cool phonetic illusion
Cool phonetic illusion
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cool phonetic illusion
(48 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cool phonetic illusion
(52 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cool phonetic illusion
(59 lines)
From:
Edgard Bikelis <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cool phonetic illusion
(51 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cool phonetic illusion
(40 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cool phonetic illusion
(30 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cool phonetic illusion
(33 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cool phonetic illusion
(51 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cool phonetic illusion
(51 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Cool phonetic illusion
(48 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Euir news
Euir news
(45 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Euir news
(38 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Glossopoeia out of (pseudo)glossolalia
Glossopoeia out of (pseudo)glossolalia
(73 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Glossopoeia out of (pseudo)glossolalia
(92 lines)
From:
John Campbell <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Glossopoeia out of (pseudo)glossolalia
(28 lines)
From:
Wycoval <
[log in to unmask]
>
lexicographers (was; Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!
Re: lexicographers (was; Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!
(53 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Making your language sound nice
Re: Making your language sound nice
(83 lines)
From:
Michael Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Making your language sound nice
(57 lines)
From:
Michael Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Making your language sound nice
(144 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Making your language sound nice
(136 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Making your language sound nice
(112 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Making your language sound nice
(58 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Making your language sound nice
(62 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Making your language sound nice
(46 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Making your language sound nice
(55 lines)
From:
Michael Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Making your language sound nice
(58 lines)
From:
Michael Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Making your language sound nice
(46 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Making your language sound nice
(49 lines)
From:
Michael Martin <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Making your language sound nice
(70 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Monster phonology in need of romanization help
Re: Monster phonology in need of romanization help
(205 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Naive fluent speaker of one's conlang?
Naive fluent speaker of one's conlang?
(38 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naive fluent speaker of one's conlang?
(40 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naive fluent speaker of one's conlang?
(50 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naive fluent speaker of one's conlang?
(45 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naive fluent speaker of one's conlang?
(54 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Naive fluent speaker of one's conlang?
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Nevermind, I think I figured it out. (< TECH: OT: Anyone able to get Outlook '03 to properly handle outgoing messages in Unicode/UTF8?)
Nevermind, I think I figured it out. (< TECH: OT: Anyone able to get Outlook '03 to properly handle outgoing messages in Unicode/UTF8?)
(60 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Nevermind, I think I figured it out. (< TECH: OT: Anyone able to get Outlook '03 to properly handle outgoing messages in Unicode/UTF8?)
(42 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nevermind, I think I figured it out. (< TECH: OT: Anyone able to get Outlook '03 to properly handle outgoing messages in Unicode/UTF8?)
(54 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Nevermind, I think I figured it out. (< TECH: OT: Anyone able to get Outlook '03 to properly handle outgoing messages in Unicode/UTF8?)
(54 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Nevermind, I think I figured it out. (< TECH: OT: Anyone able to get Outlook '03 to properly handle outgoing messages in Unicode/UTF8?)
(48 lines)
From:
Carsten Becker <
[log in to unmask]
>
not un-/anti-passive
not un-/anti-passive
(28 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(51 lines)
From:
JR <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(85 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(108 lines)
From:
JR <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(69 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(113 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(43 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(60 lines)
From:
Ph. D. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(65 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(180 lines)
From:
JR <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(65 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(53 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(71 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(75 lines)
From:
Elliott Lash <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(242 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: not un-/anti-passive
(177 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
NUMBERS
Re: NUMBERS
(111 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
NUMBERS
(215 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
OT Hildegard(e) (was: Naive fluent speaker of one's conlang?)
Re: OT Hildegard(e) (was: Naive fluent speaker of one's conlang?)
(46 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT Hildegard(e) (was: Naive fluent speaker of one's conlang?)
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Query from another list
Query from another list
(28 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
restricted semantics language
Re: restricted semantics language
(90 lines)
From:
Nils Schäffer <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: restricted semantics language
(68 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: restricted semantics language
(48 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: restricted semantics language
(65 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: restricted semantics language
(31 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: restricted semantics language
(48 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: restricted semantics language
(44 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: OT: Anyone able to get Outlook '03 to properly handle outgoing messages in Unicode/UTF8?
TECH: OT: Anyone able to get Outlook '03 to properly handle outgoing messages in Unicode/UTF8?
(34 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
THEORY: Russian grammar for linguists
THEORY: Russian grammar for linguists
(29 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: THEORY: Russian grammar for linguists
(38 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Uriania pages.
Uriania pages.
(54 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Uriania pages.
(63 lines)
From:
Scotto Hlad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Uriania pages.
(54 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
USAGE Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
(38 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
(60 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
(42 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
(62 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
(61 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
USAGE: Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
(41 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
(63 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
(77 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
(39 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Re: [CONLANG] Bunty.
(37 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
![[Conlang Flag]](http://www.theiling.de/00/conflag_25gif.gif){kind=small}
Conlang Mailing List – June 2008, week 3
Conlang Mailing List – June 2008, week 3
