LISTSERV 16.0 - AUXLANG Archives

Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:36:53 -0400

151 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:26:59 -0700

169 lines

Re: "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:58:20 +1000

199 lines

George Boeree <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:27:52 -0400

71 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:17:09 -0700

43 lines

A la recerca della lingua perfetta was: Sambahsa on-line lexicon

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:53:24 +0200

58 lines

Re: A la recerca della lingua perfetta was: Sambahsa on-line lexicon

George Boeree <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 07:56:03 -0400

160 lines

Re: A la recerca della lingua perfetta was: Sambahsa on-line lexicon

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:21:30 -0700

40 lines

Re: A la recerca della lingua perfetta was: Sambahsa on-line lexicon

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:37:13 +0900

67 lines

Chinese e japanese cresce

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:49:47 +0200

38 lines

CONLANG the Movie - Fundraiser

Baldvin Kari Sveinbjoernsson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:09:12 -0400

95 lines

Cooperation [WAS: When should a langu age b e consi dered “ a rti f icial” or “ nat ural” ? }

Re: Cooperation [WAS: When should a langu age b e consi dered “ a rti f icial” or “ nat ural” ? }

Matthew Barnett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:21:41 +0100

64 lines

Cooperation [WAS: When should a langu age b e consi dered “ arti f icial” or “ nat ural” ?}

Re: Cooperation [WAS: When should a langu age b e consi dered “ arti f icial” or “ nat ural” ?}

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:03:26 +0200

62 lines

Cooperation [WAS: When should a langu age b e consi dered “ arti f icial” or “ nat ural” ?}

Re: Cooperation [WAS: When should a langu age b e consi dered “ arti f icial” or “ nat ural” ?}

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:52:59 +1000

106 lines

Cooperation [WAS: When should a langu age be consi dered “ artificial” or “nat ural” ?}

Re: Cooperation [WAS: When should a langu age be consi dered “ artificial” or “nat ural” ?}

Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:53:43 +0100

45 lines

Re: Cooperation [WAS: When should a langu age be consi dered “ artificial” or “nat ural” ?}

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:56:59 +1000

75 lines

Fwd: your mail

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:33:14 +0900

149 lines

George Boeree's 'Neutral Language'

Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:36:39 -0400

83 lines

George Boeree <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:43:18 -0400

101 lines

Franz Sledge <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:05:04 -0400

26 lines

George Boeree <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:26:46 -0400

103 lines

George Boeree <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:35:10 -0400

106 lines

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:46:34 +0900

71 lines

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:36:12 -0400

30 lines

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:35:15 +0900

73 lines

International English

George Boeree <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:25:24 -0400

157 lines

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:09:15 -0400

144 lines

George Boeree <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:13:37 -0400

177 lines

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:21:23 -0400

289 lines

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:27:29 +1000

179 lines

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:58:55 +0900

90 lines

Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:34:45 +0200

347 lines

George Boeree <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:01:22 -0400

76 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:25:02 -0700

42 lines

Matthew Barnett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:31:30 +0100

40 lines

International English -- Model English

Jean-François Colson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:18:17 +0200

124 lines

Re: International English -- Model English

Leo Moser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:55:06 -0400

58 lines

Lips-Kith

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:04:12 -0400

35 lines

Re: Lips-Kith

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:05:37 -0700

64 lines

Re: Lips-Kith

Re: Ni filozofiez, kolegi!

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:42:22 -0400

47 lines

Re: Lips-Kith

Franz Sledge <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:24:17 -0400

32 lines

Ni filozofiez, kolegi!

Alexandre Xavier Casanova Domingo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:19:05 +0200

465 lines

Overcompounding

Re: Overcompounding

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:27:35 +1000

214 lines

Sambahsa on-line lexicon

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:22:47 -0400

46 lines

Tomo a palabra por alusións, rapaza (era: Hindi, bangla, telegu, marati, ingles,...).

Alexandre Xavier Casanova Domingo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:03:04 +0200

483 lines

Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:04:14 +0900

52 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:05:02 +0200

55 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:44:28 +0200

78 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Risto Kupsala <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:58:11 +0300

45 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:27:41 +0900

75 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:28:16 -0400

65 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:36:44 -0400

54 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:55:34 -0400

81 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:33:26 +0200

36 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Risto Kupsala <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:38:33 +0300

63 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:57:05 -0700

58 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:39:59 -0400

93 lines

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:40:05 +1000

100 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:10:17 +0200

37 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jun 2008 03:04:47 +0900

48 lines

Writing system

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:52:04 +0900

66 lines

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:47:30 -0400

65 lines

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:18:17 +0900

82 lines

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 08:32:18 -0400

83 lines

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:48:15 +1000

85 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:13:40 +0200

75 lines

your mail

Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:51:33 -0400

35 lines

George Boeree <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:58:56 -0400

123 lines

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:55:39 +0900

67 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:37:50 -0700

65 lines

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:10:43 +0900

63 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:39:57 -0700

55 lines

George Boeree <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:45:05 -0400

134 lines

George Boeree <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:55:48 -0400

116 lines

Risto Kupsala <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:13:40 +0300

80 lines

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:22:26 +0900

62 lines

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:36:57 +0900

71 lines

Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:08:40 -0400

90 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:35:23 -0700

131 lines

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:05:47 -0400

64 lines

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:31:40 -0400

125 lines

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:49:05 -0400

98 lines

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:54:14 -0400

41 lines

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:47:35 -0400

72 lines

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:55:09 +0900

94 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 06:47:59 +0200

54 lines

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:30:29 -0400

64 lines

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:33:58 -0400

44 lines

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:14:55 +0900

75 lines

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:17:14 +0900

58 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:41:04 -0700

70 lines

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 20:45:30 -0400

102 lines

Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:12:48 -0400

154 lines

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:24:16 +0900

73 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:51:19 -0700

58 lines

Matthew Barnett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:43:37 +0100

47 lines

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:20:32 +0900

58 lines

[PATER NOSTER] øøø OMNIAL øøø‏

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 11:06:37 +1000

47 lines

your mail [offlist]

Re: your mail [offlist]

George Boeree <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:48:52 -0400

212 lines

Re: your mail [offlist]

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:40:51 -0700

33 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:39:44 -0700

54 lines

[PATER NOSTER] OMNIAL

Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jun 2008 19:43:20 -0400

46 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 09:10:56 +0200

60 lines

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:29:58 -0400

37 lines