Conlang
Mailing List July 2008, week 2
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
arithmography (fuit: Re: The philosophical language fallacy)
CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger)
(2 messages)
Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon (was Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon))))
(3 messages)
Lots of Questions About Tones
(16 messages)
Lots of questions about tones
(5 messages)
Lots of Questions About Tones
Lots of Questions About Tones (more questions)
(6 messages)
Media mortality (< facing your own mortality)
My forum
Partially-heard words. (or phrases?)
(6 messages)
promiscuity & fidelity (was: ...)
promiscuity & fidelity (was: Re: everything under the sun)
(4 messages)
promiscuity & fidelity (was: Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon))
(3 messages)
sasxsek.org
Syllable Structure, Syllable Weight, Rhythm, Stress
(4 messages)
The 2008 Smiley Award Winner: Ithkuil
(2 messages)
The philosophical language fallacy (was ...)
Word classification
(2 messages)
Word classification (was ...)
(3 messages)
Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
(12 messages)
Word classification (was: ...)
[ANNOUNCE] SETI's Are We Alone interview w/ Donald Boozer
(2 messages)
arithmography (fuit: Re: The philosophical language fallacy)
Re: arithmography (fuit: Re: The philosophical language fallacy)
(86 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger)
Re: CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger)
(76 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger)
(103 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon (was Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon))))
Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon (was Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon))))
(60 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon (was Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon))))
(69 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon (was Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon))))
(40 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lots of Questions About Tones
Lots of Questions About Tones
(91 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(57 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(75 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(94 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(22 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(73 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(31 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(43 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(54 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(82 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(85 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(51 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(57 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(36 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(54 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(93 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lots of questions about tones
Re: Lots of questions about tones
(34 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of questions about tones
(52 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of questions about tones
(56 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of questions about tones
(53 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of questions about tones
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lots of Questions About Tones
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones
(61 lines)
From:
Nomad of Norad -- David C Hall <
[log in to unmask]
>
Lots of Questions About Tones (more questions)
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones (more questions)
(100 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones (more questions)
(24 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones (more questions)
(56 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones (more questions)
(87 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones (more questions)
(118 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Lots of Questions About Tones (more questions)
(122 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Media mortality (< facing your own mortality)
Re: Media mortality (< facing your own mortality)
(71 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
My forum
My forum
(40 lines)
From:
janko gorenc <
[log in to unmask]
>
Partially-heard words. (or phrases?)
Partially-heard words. (or phrases?)
(37 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Partially-heard words. (or phrases?)
(80 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Partially-heard words. (or phrases?)
(53 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Partially-heard words. (or phrases?)
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Partially-heard words. (or phrases?)
(20 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Partially-heard words. (or phrases?)
(50 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
promiscuity & fidelity (was: ...)
Re: promiscuity & fidelity (was: ...)
(65 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
promiscuity & fidelity (was: Re: everything under the sun)
Re: promiscuity & fidelity (was: Re: everything under the sun)
(33 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: promiscuity & fidelity (was: Re: everything under the sun)
(41 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: promiscuity & fidelity (was: Re: everything under the sun)
(51 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: promiscuity & fidelity (was: Re: everything under the sun)
(52 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
promiscuity & fidelity (was: Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon))
promiscuity & fidelity (was: Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon))
(38 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: promiscuity & fidelity (was: Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon))
(57 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: promiscuity & fidelity (was: Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon))
(67 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
sasxsek.org
sasxsek.org
(35 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Syllable Structure, Syllable Weight, Rhythm, Stress
Syllable Structure, Syllable Weight, Rhythm, Stress
(50 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllable Structure, Syllable Weight, Rhythm, Stress
(101 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllable Structure, Syllable Weight, Rhythm, Stress
(35 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Syllable Structure, Syllable Weight, Rhythm, Stress
(53 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
The 2008 Smiley Award Winner: Ithkuil
The 2008 Smiley Award Winner: Ithkuil
(66 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: The 2008 Smiley Award Winner: Ithkuil
(50 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
The philosophical language fallacy (was ...)
Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was ...)
(68 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Word classification
Word classification
(53 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification
(46 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Word classification (was ...)
Re: Word classification (was ...)
(102 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification (was ...)
(65 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification (was ...)
(108 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
(75 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
(184 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
(53 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
(185 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
(45 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
(104 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
(118 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
(71 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
(273 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
(73 lines)
From:
And Rosta <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Word classification (was Re: The philosophical language fallacy (was Re: Evanescence of information (was Re: Going NOMAIL: Honeymoon)))
(96 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Word classification (was: ...)
Re: Word classification (was: ...)
(134 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
[ANNOUNCE] SETI's Are We Alone interview w/ Donald Boozer
Re: [ANNOUNCE] SETI's Are We Alone interview w/ Donald Boozer
(67 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: [ANNOUNCE] SETI's Are We Alone interview w/ Donald Boozer
(49 lines)
From:
James W. <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU