LISTSERV 16.0 - AUXLANG Archives

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:30:48 +0900

68 lines

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:08:45 -0400

198 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:56:31 +0200

55 lines

Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:54:27 -0000

63 lines

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:12:03 +0900

63 lines

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:23:11 +0900

116 lines

Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:36:24 -0000

47 lines

Rex May <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:01:25 -0400

22 lines

Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:21:24 +0100

50 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:55:16 -0700

56 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:17:01 -0700

40 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:21:44 -0700

77 lines

Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:53:10 -0400

55 lines

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:39:30 +0900

68 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:46:50 +0200

81 lines

Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:52:41 -0000

46 lines

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:00:56 -0400

81 lines

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:18:59 -0400

51 lines

Rex May <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:52:19 -0400

37 lines

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:52:56 -0400

95 lines

"one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:31:54 +0100

50 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:49:33 +1000

80 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:02:16 +1000

83 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:17:46 -0400

77 lines

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:32:30 +1000

141 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:46:39 +1000

109 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:54:30 +1000

96 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:00:31 +1000

62 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:09:35 +1000

88 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:48:20 +0900

83 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:59:20 +0900

65 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:30:32 -0400

44 lines

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:42:26 -0400

57 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:23:43 +0900

68 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:07:39 -0400

47 lines

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:25:36 -0400

65 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:33:58 -0000

61 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Matthew Barnett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:31:37 +0100

59 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:31:07 +0900

71 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:43:34 -0000

67 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:55:55 -0000

48 lines

Re: "one" vs. "a(n)" (< Which natural language deserves our support if any?)

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:24:22 +0900

98 lines

"Why Esperanto Is Different" somehow links Occidental language to Naziism

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 23:14:09 +0900

114 lines

Re: "Why Esperanto Is Different" somehow links Occidental language to Naziism

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:46:15 -0400

140 lines

Re: "Why Esperanto Is Different" somehow links Occidental language to Naziism

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 03:02:09 +0900

63 lines

Re: "Why Esperanto Is Different" somehow links Occidental language to Naziism

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:22:53 -0700

39 lines

Re: "Why Esperanto Is Different" somehow links Occidental language to Naziism

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:36:46 +0900

64 lines

Re: "Why Esperanto Is Different" somehow links Occidental language to Naziism

Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:14:50 -0000

62 lines

Re: "Why Esperanto Is Different" somehow links Occidental language to Naziism

Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:32:13 -0000

48 lines

Re: "Why Esperanto Is Different" somehow links Occidental language to Naziism

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:27:44 +0900

57 lines

Re: "Why Esperanto Is Different" somehow links Occidental language to Naziism

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:07:58 -0700

53 lines

Assimilation (< "Artificial" prejudice)

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:22:31 +0200

73 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:40:02 +0200

55 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:20:45 +0200

42 lines

Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:17:21 -0000

49 lines

Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:50:12 -0000

55 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:24:32 +0200

75 lines

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:11:05 -0400

55 lines

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:41:51 +0900

61 lines

Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:47:37 +0100

39 lines

Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:56:10 -0000

59 lines

Rex May <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:06:55 -0400

37 lines

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:20:35 -0400

42 lines

Did you know...? section on the Main Page of Wikipedia

Anvarzhon Zhurajev <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:18:11 -0400

41 lines

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:47:39 +0900

39 lines

Re: Did you know...? section on the Main Page of Wikipedia

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:49:46 +0900

54 lines

Re: Did you know...? section on the Main Page of Wikipedia

Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:44:45 +0100

42 lines

Re: Did you know...? section on the Main Page of Wikipedia

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:55:24 -0700

67 lines

Re: Did you know...? section on the Main Page of Wikipedia

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:34:58 +0900

65 lines

Re: Did you know...? section on the Main Page of Wikipedia

MacLeod Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:22:49 +0900

56 lines

Re: Did you know...? section on the Main Page of Wikipedia

Dmitri Ivanov <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:33:29 -0000

62 lines

ESPERANTO - INTERLINGUA - IDO

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:59:06 -0700

30 lines

Good arguments about the spelling reform issue

Re: Good arguments about the spelling reform issue

Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:54:20 +0100

56 lines

Re: Good arguments about the spelling reform issue

La retirada del quechua como id i oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:18:59 -0400

80 lines

Re: La retirada del quechua como id i oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:47:10 +0200

65 lines

Re: La retirada del quechua como id i oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 01:37:39 -0400

134 lines

La retirada del quechua como id i oma oficial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas

Re: La retirada del quechua como id i oma oficial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 06:35:07 +0200

70 lines

La retirada del quechua como idi oma of icial de Ecu a d o r molesta a los�

Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma of icial de Ecu a d o r molesta a los�

La retirada del quechua como idi oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los�

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:22:17 -0400

56 lines

Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los�

Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:32:08 +0100

48 lines

La retirada del quechua como idi oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas

Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas

Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:08:55 +0100

72 lines

Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas

Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:53:12 -0400

80 lines

Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:37:41 +0100

47 lines

Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas

Antonielly Garcia Rodrigues <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:39:28 +0100

36 lines

Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas

Re: La retirada del quechua como idi oma of icial de Ecu a d or molesta a los indígenas

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:11:29 -0400

76 lines

OT: UN < "Artificial" prejudice (< your mail)

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:17:07 -0400

51 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 06:51:32 +0200

59 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:43:54 +0200

39 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:45:00 -0700

41 lines

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:05:39 -0400

49 lines

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:59:27 -0400

67 lines

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:33:51 +0200

58 lines

Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:47:09 +0100

44 lines

So Dave was right...

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:49:58 -0700

30 lines

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:42:46 -0400

55 lines

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:01:57 +0900

69 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:59:53 -0700

80 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:07:32 -0700

60 lines

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:09:30 -0400

105 lines

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 13:52:10 -0700

113 lines

Speed (< "Artificial" prejudice)

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:21:59 -0400

147 lines

Re: Speed (< "Artificial" prejudice)

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:39:09 +1000

285 lines

Re: Speed (< "Artificial" prejudice)

Tone (< "Artificial" prejudice)

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:02:40 -0400

206 lines

spells in latin

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:34:03 -0400

40 lines

Re: spells in latin

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:12:54 -0700

44 lines

Re: spells in latin

Olivier Simon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 02:48:55 -0400

55 lines

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:40:01 +1000

112 lines

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:42:34 +1000

85 lines

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:02:11 -0400

67 lines

Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:10:29 -0400

51 lines

Welsh English speech goes online

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:34:09 -0700

55 lines

James Chandler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 05:40:30 -0700

29 lines

Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Geoffrey King <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:38:17 +0100

78 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Matthew Barnett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:14:02 +0100

78 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Kjell Rehnström <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 06:52:31 +0200

48 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Cheng-Zhong Su <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:09:31 +1000

218 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:12:23 +0900

70 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 08:29:33 -0400

52 lines

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 22:51:36 +0900

69 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:04:08 -0400

63 lines

Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:22:48 -0400

44 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Jens Wilkinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:48:12 +0900

70 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

steve rice <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:04:17 -0700

55 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Paul Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:05:51 -0400

50 lines

World government = world language? (< "Artificial" prejudice)