Conlang Mailing List – August 2008, week 1

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "In spite of" (12 messages)
• 3d Language Creation Conference? (8 messages)
• 5th morphosyntactic category name? (8 messages)
• An Interesting thought
• Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (22 messages)
• Bonobo language
• Brithenig (was Re: Ebb and flow (was Re: Naisek Pages Updated))
• Case or theta-role term for object of performance? (4 messages)
• Compiled languages (15 messages)
• Contact information for Joshua Shinavier and Daniel Feuchard? (2 messages)
• Ebb and flow (2 messages)
• Ebb and flow (was Re: Naisek Pages Updated) (4 messages)
• Fifth morphosyntactic category? (5 messages)
• Focus, please (5 messages)
• German with Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja? (8 messages)
• Help us add closed captions to LCC videos
• Morphones (was: German with Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja?)
• There's always room for more (was Re: Ebb and flow (was Re: Naisek Pages Updated))

1. "In spite of"
   • "In spite of" (61 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "In spite of" (43 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "In spite of" (42 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: "In spite of" (47 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "In spite of" (46 lines)
     From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "In spite of" (69 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "In spite of" (48 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "In spite of" (44 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "In spite of" (53 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "In spite of" (74 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "In spite of" (34 lines)
     From: John Quijada <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "In spite of" (80 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

2. 3d Language Creation Conference?
   • 3d Language Creation Conference? (51 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 3d Language Creation Conference? (49 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 3d Language Creation Conference? (54 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 3d Language Creation Conference? (39 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 3d Language Creation Conference? (46 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 3d Language Creation Conference? (39 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 3d Language Creation Conference? (44 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 3d Language Creation Conference? (43 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]

3. 5th morphosyntactic category name?
   • 5th morphosyntactic category name? (38 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 5th morphosyntactic category name? (45 lines)
     From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 5th morphosyntactic category name? (34 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 5th morphosyntactic category name? (60 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 5th morphosyntactic category name? (36 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 5th morphosyntactic category name? (58 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 5th morphosyntactic category name? (43 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 5th morphosyntactic category name? (46 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

4. An Interesting thought
   • An Interesting thought (38 lines)
     From: william drewery <[log in to unmask]>

5. Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage
   • Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (72 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (61 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (66 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (84 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (98 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (96 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (182 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (78 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (44 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (74 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (58 lines)
     From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (54 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (59 lines)
     From: Veoler <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (50 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (75 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (53 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (127 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (32 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (52 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (51 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (56 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Avoiding near-collisions in vocabulary coinage (87 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

6. Bonobo language
   • Bonobo language (28 lines)
     From: John Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

7. Brithenig (was Re: Ebb and flow (was Re: Naisek Pages Updated))
   • Brithenig (was Re: Ebb and flow (was Re: Naisek Pages Updated)) (55 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

8. Case or theta-role term for object of performance?
   • Case or theta-role term for object of performance? (120 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case or theta-role term for object of performance? (61 lines)
     From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case or theta-role term for object of performance? (85 lines)
     From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Case or theta-role term for object of performance? (158 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

9. Compiled languages
   • Compiled languages (30 lines)
     From: John Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Compiled languages (54 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Compiled languages (58 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Compiled languages (65 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Compiled languages (69 lines)
     From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Compiled languages (46 lines)
     From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Compiled languages (79 lines)
     From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Compiled languages (90 lines)
     From: John Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Compiled languages (29 lines)
     From: John Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Compiled languages (34 lines)
     From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Compiled languages (52 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Compiled languages (38 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
   • Re: Compiled languages (41 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Compiled languages (47 lines)
     From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Compiled languages (73 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

10. Contact information for Joshua Shinavier and Daniel Feuchard?
    • Contact information for Joshua Shinavier and Daniel Feuchard? (31 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Contact information for Joshua Shinavier and Daniel Feuchard? (32 lines)
      From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>

11. Ebb and flow
    • Re: Ebb and flow (68 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ebb and flow (102 lines)
      From: Daniel Prohaska <[log in to unmask]>

12. Ebb and flow (was Re: Naisek Pages Updated)
    • Re: Ebb and flow (was Re: Naisek Pages Updated) (99 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ebb and flow (was Re: Naisek Pages Updated) (80 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ebb and flow (was Re: Naisek Pages Updated) (85 lines)
      From: andrew <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ebb and flow (was Re: Naisek Pages Updated) (82 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>

13. Fifth morphosyntactic category?
    • Fifth morphosyntactic category? (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fifth morphosyntactic category? (47 lines)
      From: Philip Newton <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fifth morphosyntactic category? (61 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fifth morphosyntactic category? (76 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Fifth morphosyntactic category? (54 lines)
      From: Paul Roser <[log in to unmask]>

14. Focus, please
    • Focus, please (156 lines)
      From: Yahya Abdal-Aziz <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Focus, please (96 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Focus, please (162 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Focus, please (84 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Focus, please (39 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>

15. German with Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja?
    • Re: German with Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja? (39 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: German with Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja? (61 lines)
      From: Tristan McLeay <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: German with Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja? (56 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: German with Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja? (67 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: German with Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja? (59 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: German with Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja? (148 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: German with Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja? (80 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: German with Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja? (64 lines)
      From: David McCann <[log in to unmask]>

16. Help us add closed captions to LCC videos
    • Help us add closed captions to LCC videos (40 lines)
      From: Sai Emrys <[log in to unmask]>

17. Morphones (was: German with Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja?)
    • Re: Morphones (was: German with Hanzi/Kanji/Hanja?) (65 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

18. There's always room for more (was Re: Ebb and flow (was Re: Naisek Pages Updated))
    • There's always room for more (was Re: Ebb and flow (was Re: Naisek Pages Updated)) (104 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>