Conlang Mailing List – August 2008, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "In spite of" (2 messages)
• "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (8 messages)
• 'out-' affix in conlangs? (49 messages)
• Ambiguty in (natlangs and) conlangs (was Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
• archives of this list 1991-94
• Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (14 messages)
• Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (4 messages)
• CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger) (2 messages)
• Day of the Republic.
• Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (15 messages)
• Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (26 messages)
• Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (3 messages)
• OFFLIST: Re: OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data
• OT: Links (2 messages)
• OT: Links (was: Re: Derived adpositions) (2 messages)
• OT: Open-ended fiction (was: Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?)
• OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data
• Revisions of conlangs (was Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?)
• Semantic typology? (16 messages)
• Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (4 messages)
• Slavic diachronics (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
• TAN: Day of the Republic. (4 messages)
• Ways to get good grammar coverage (6 messages)
• YAEPT French loans (5 messages)
• YAEPT French loans (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (2 messages)
• YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself? (3 messages)

1. "In spite of"
   • Re: "In spite of" (64 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 15:48:08 -0000
   • Re: "In spite of" (47 lines)
     From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:52:10 -0400

2. "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms
   • "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (48 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:34:11 -0400
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (38 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:10:58 -0400
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (55 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:24:29 -0700
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (56 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:26:03 -0700
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (53 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:52:15 -0400
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (62 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:06:01 -0700
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (68 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:39:09 -0400
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (42 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:54:39 +0200

3. 'out-' affix in conlangs?
   • 'out-' affix in conlangs? (47 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:58:47 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (64 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:29:25 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (47 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:49:46 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (64 lines)
     From: M. Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 20:14:05 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (77 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:23:19 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (99 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:53:52 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (79 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:18:18 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (51 lines)
     From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 20:47:45 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (65 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:43:02 +0800
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (53 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:22:10 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (43 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:50:19 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (54 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:21:08 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (59 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:31:40 +0800
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (50 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:53:08 +0100
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (33 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:35:35 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (52 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:55:18 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (35 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:50:39 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (37 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:25:32 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (65 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:11:02 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (38 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:12:24 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (57 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:34:14 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (80 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:32:26 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (44 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:04:47 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (49 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:53:17 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (56 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:50:22 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (57 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:56:51 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (43 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:12:25 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (46 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:37:14 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (47 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:13:48 +0800
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (48 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:06:54 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (57 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:12:34 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (47 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:23:06 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (48 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:24:22 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (54 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:25:14 +0800
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (42 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:15:21 -0400
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (43 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:33:04 +0800
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (72 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:44:23 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (56 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:31:18 +0800
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (57 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:39:35 +0100
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (46 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:57:55 +0800
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (68 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:34:59 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (68 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:57:19 +0800
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (54 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:31:01 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (58 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:02:26 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (46 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:10:35 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (56 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:46:28 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (46 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:47:50 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (68 lines)
     From: Lars Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:53:43 +0200
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (81 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:54:08 -0400

4. Ambiguty in (natlangs and) conlangs (was Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
   • Ambiguty in (natlangs and) conlangs (was Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (98 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:11:17 +0200

5. archives of this list 1991-94
   • archives of this list 1991-94 (33 lines)
     From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:09:16 -0400

6. Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?
   • Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (120 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 01:16:31 -0400
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (181 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 22:33:07 +0200
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (92 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:24:42 -0400
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (92 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 23:25:55 +0200
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (144 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:54:31 -0700
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (121 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:34:12 +0200
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (41 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:54:31 +0100
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (43 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:46:01 +0200
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (85 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:19:53 -0400
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (103 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:56:44 -0700
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (275 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:31:31 +0200
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (77 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:32:46 -0700
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (46 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:44:53 -0400
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (104 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:07:36 -0400

7. Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
   • Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (53 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:10:26 -0400
   • Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (83 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:53:23 +0800
   • Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (66 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:41:37 -0000
   • Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (35 lines)
     From: Ollock Ackeop <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:38:24 -0400

8. CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger)
   • Re: CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger) (89 lines)
     From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:27:53 -0400
   • Re: CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger) (106 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 13:45:17 -0400

9. Day of the Republic.
   • Re: Day of the Republic. (115 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:38:17 +0200

10. Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
    • Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (93 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:51:15 -0400
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (80 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:41:08 -0400
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (101 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:02:01 -0400
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (41 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:32:00 -0000
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (48 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:10:02 -0700
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (40 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:36:42 +0200
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (42 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:00:49 -0000
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (55 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:31:21 +0200
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (120 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:24:28 -0400
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (91 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:57:53 +0200
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (83 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:25:45 +0800
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (69 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:23:15 +0200
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (39 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:17:26 -0400
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (40 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:31:50 -0400
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (57 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:33:27 -0400

11. Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
    • Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (131 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 12:45:13 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (40 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:55:51 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (81 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:22:13 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (72 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:47:30 -0500
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (45 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:20:16 -0000
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (50 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:18:31 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (538 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:04:29 +0200
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (70 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:30:56 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (39 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:08:33 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (68 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:06:37 +0200
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:28:02 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (62 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:44:47 +0200
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (52 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:41:48 +0100
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:26:30 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (142 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:22:48 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (167 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:25:33 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (38 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:39:34 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (74 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:13:23 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (181 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:26:08 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (155 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:28:47 +0200
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (189 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:26:25 +0200
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (266 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:26:08 +0100
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (67 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:56:50 +0200
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (35 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:14:03 +0200
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:16:35 -0400
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (49 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:42:46 -0400

12. Nutrition and pleasurable sense data
    • Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (64 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:45:17 -0400
    • Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (189 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:43:28 -0400
    • Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (75 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 22:57:49 -0400

13. OFFLIST: Re: OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data
    • OFFLIST: Re: OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (62 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:30:11 -0400

14. OT: Links
    • Re: OT: Links (45 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:20:50 +0200
    • Re: OT: Links (38 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:40:56 +0200

15. OT: Links (was: Re: Derived adpositions)
    • OT: Links (was: Re: Derived adpositions) (39 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:53:07 -0400
    • Re: OT: Links (was: Re: Derived adpositions) (67 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:27:10 +0200

16. OT: Open-ended fiction (was: Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?)
    • OT: Open-ended fiction (was: Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?) (54 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:41:14 -0400

17. OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data
    • OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (54 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:16:18 -0400

18. Revisions of conlangs (was Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?)
    • Revisions of conlangs (was Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?) (122 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:21:30 +0200

19. Semantic typology?
    • Semantic typology? (39 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:08:07 -0400
    • Re: Semantic typology? (56 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:05:18 -0400
    • Re: Semantic typology? (83 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:44:32 -0400
    • Re: Semantic typology? (35 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:48:44 -0400
    • Re: Semantic typology? (53 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:17:26 +0200
    • Re: Semantic typology? (37 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:46:33 -0400
    • Re: Semantic typology? (44 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:31:50 -0400
    • Re: Semantic typology? (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:55:27 -0400
    • Re: Semantic typology? (48 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:11:57 -0400
    • Re: Semantic typology? (46 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:24:28 -0400
    • Re: Semantic typology? (34 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:38:52 -0400
    • Re: Semantic typology? (60 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:46:44 +0100
    • Re: Semantic typology? (56 lines)
      From: Carl Banks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:29:55 -0400
    • Re: Semantic typology? (86 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:23:02 +0200
    • Re: Semantic typology? (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:00:05 -0400
    • Re: Semantic typology? (48 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:14:31 +0200

20. Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
    • Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (44 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:10:02 -0400
    • Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (62 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:16:58 +0800
    • Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (41 lines)
      From: Lars Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:35:34 +0200
    • Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (42 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:43:06 -0400

21. Slavic diachronics (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
    • Slavic diachronics (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (28 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:30:29 -0400

22. TAN: Day of the Republic.
    • TAN: Day of the Republic. (50 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:06:22 +0200
    • Re: TAN: Day of the Republic. (53 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:30:44 +0200
    • Re: TAN: Day of the Republic. (44 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:44:41 -0700
    • Re: TAN: Day of the Republic. (28 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:58:44 -0400

23. Ways to get good grammar coverage
    • Ways to get good grammar coverage (48 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:19:02 -0500
    • Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage (65 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:06:07 -0600
    • Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage (48 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:37:35 -0700
    • Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage (79 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:02:16 -0400
    • Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage (30 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:40:27 -0400
    • Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage (61 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:48:29 +0200

24. YAEPT French loans
    • Re: YAEPT French loans (43 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:50:33 +0200
    • Re: YAEPT French loans (63 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:31:12 +0100
    • Re: YAEPT French loans (62 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:29:18 +0200
    • Re: YAEPT French loans (45 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:02:37 -0400
    • Re: YAEPT French loans (53 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:35:22 +0200

25. YAEPT French loans (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
    • YAEPT French loans (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (60 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:33:57 +0100
    • Re: YAEPT French loans (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:42:08 -0400

26. YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself?
    • YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself? (41 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:49:01 +0200
    • Re: YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself? (61 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:03:36 -0400
    • Re: YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself? (51 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:11:45 +0100