Conlang Mailing List – August 2008, week 2

Sort by Author | Date | Topic Chronologically | Most recent first

Options Show author | Hide author Show table of contents | Hide table of contents

Navigation Back to main CONLANG page Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings) Search Archives

Table of contents:

• "In spite of" (2 messages)
• "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (8 messages)
• 'out-' affix in conlangs? (49 messages)
• Ambiguty in (natlangs and) conlangs (was Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
• archives of this list 1991-94
• Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (14 messages)
• Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (4 messages)
• CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger) (2 messages)
• Day of the Republic.
• Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (15 messages)
• Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (26 messages)
• Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (3 messages)
• OFFLIST: Re: OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data
• OT: Links (2 messages)
• OT: Links (was: Re: Derived adpositions) (2 messages)
• OT: Open-ended fiction (was: Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?)
• OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data
• Revisions of conlangs (was Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?)
• Semantic typology? (16 messages)
• Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (4 messages)
• Slavic diachronics (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
• TAN: Day of the Republic. (4 messages)
• Ways to get good grammar coverage (6 messages)
• YAEPT French loans (5 messages)
• YAEPT French loans (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (2 messages)
• YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself? (3 messages)

1. "In spite of"
   • Re: "In spite of" (64 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "In spite of" (47 lines)
     From: Harold Ensle <[log in to unmask]>

2. "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms
   • "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (48 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (38 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (55 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (56 lines)
     From: Scotto Hlad <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (53 lines)
     From: Jeffrey Jones <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (62 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (68 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (42 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

3. 'out-' affix in conlangs?
   • 'out-' affix in conlangs? (47 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (64 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (47 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (64 lines)
     From: M. Czapp <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (77 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (99 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (79 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (51 lines)
     From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (65 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (53 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (43 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (54 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (59 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (50 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (33 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (52 lines)
     From: Roger Mills <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (35 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (37 lines)
     From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (65 lines)
     From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (38 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (57 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (80 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (44 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (49 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (56 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (57 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (43 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (46 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (47 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (48 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (57 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (47 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (48 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (54 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (42 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (43 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (72 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (56 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (57 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (46 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (68 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (68 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (54 lines)
     From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (58 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (46 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (56 lines)
     From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (46 lines)
     From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (68 lines)
     From: Lars Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs? (81 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

4. Ambiguty in (natlangs and) conlangs (was Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
   • Ambiguty in (natlangs and) conlangs (was Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (98 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

5. archives of this list 1991-94
   • archives of this list 1991-94 (33 lines)
     From: Rick Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

6. Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?
   • Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (120 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (181 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (92 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (92 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (144 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (121 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (41 lines)
     From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (43 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (85 lines)
     From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (103 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (275 lines)
     From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (77 lines)
     From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (46 lines)
     From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (104 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>

7. Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
   • Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (53 lines)
     From: Herman Miller <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (83 lines)
     From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
   • Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (66 lines)
     From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (35 lines)
     From: Ollock Ackeop <[log in to unmask]>

8. CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger)
   • Re: CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger) (89 lines)
     From: Jan van Steenbergen <[log in to unmask]>
   • Re: CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger) (106 lines)
     From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>

9. Day of the Republic.
   • Re: Day of the Republic. (115 lines)
     From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>

10. Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
    • Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (93 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (80 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (101 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (41 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (48 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (40 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (42 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (55 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (120 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (91 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (83 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (69 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (39 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (40 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (57 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

11. Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
    • Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (131 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (40 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (81 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (72 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (45 lines)
      From: caeruleancentaur <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (50 lines)
      From: Dana Nutter <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (538 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (70 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (39 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (68 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (51 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (62 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (52 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (43 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (142 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (167 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (38 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (74 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (181 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (155 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (189 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (266 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (67 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (35 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (49 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

12. Nutrition and pleasurable sense data
    • Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (64 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (189 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (75 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

13. OFFLIST: Re: OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data
    • OFFLIST: Re: OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (62 lines)
      From: Eldin Raigmore <[log in to unmask]>

14. OT: Links
    • Re: OT: Links (45 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Links (38 lines)
      From: Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]>

15. OT: Links (was: Re: Derived adpositions)
    • OT: Links (was: Re: Derived adpositions) (39 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: OT: Links (was: Re: Derived adpositions) (67 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

16. OT: Open-ended fiction (was: Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?)
    • OT: Open-ended fiction (was: Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?) (54 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

17. OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data
    • OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (54 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

18. Revisions of conlangs (was Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?)
    • Revisions of conlangs (was Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?) (122 lines)
      From: Jörg Rhiemeier <[log in to unmask]>

19. Semantic typology?
    • Semantic typology? (39 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (56 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (83 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (35 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (53 lines)
      From: Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (37 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (44 lines)
      From: ROGER MILLS <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (37 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (48 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (46 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (34 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (60 lines)
      From: Michael Poxon <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (56 lines)
      From: Carl Banks <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (86 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (46 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Semantic typology? (48 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

20. Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
    • Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (44 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (62 lines)
      From: Eugene Oh <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (41 lines)
      From: Lars Mathiesen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (42 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>

21. Slavic diachronics (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
    • Slavic diachronics (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (28 lines)
      From: John Vertical <[log in to unmask]>

22. TAN: Day of the Republic.
    • TAN: Day of the Republic. (50 lines)
      From: Lars Finsen <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TAN: Day of the Republic. (53 lines)
      From: Carsten Becker <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TAN: Day of the Republic. (44 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: TAN: Day of the Republic. (28 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

23. Ways to get good grammar coverage
    • Ways to get good grammar coverage (48 lines)
      From: Eric Christopherson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage (65 lines)
      From: Dirk Elzinga <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage (48 lines)
      From: David J. Peterson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage (79 lines)
      From: Jim Henry <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage (30 lines)
      From: Alex Fink <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage (61 lines)
      From: taliesin the storyteller <[log in to unmask]>

24. YAEPT French loans
    • Re: YAEPT French loans (43 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT French loans (63 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT French loans (62 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT French loans (45 lines)
      From: J. 'Mach' Wust <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT French loans (53 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>

25. YAEPT French loans (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
    • YAEPT French loans (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (60 lines)
      From: R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT French loans (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (48 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>

26. YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself?
    • YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself? (41 lines)
      From: Benct Philip Jonsson <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself? (61 lines)
      From: Mark J. Reed <[log in to unmask]>
    • Re: YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself? (51 lines)
      From: Peter Collier <[log in to unmask]>