Conlang
Mailing List August 2008, week 3
Sort by
Author
| Date |
Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
(66 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(57 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(70 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "In spite of"
(65 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
(42 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
(54 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(39 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
USAGE: Esperanto for "run away"
(35 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?
(62 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?
(72 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(40 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Esperanto for "run away"
(72 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(53 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Esperanto for "run away"
(58 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(60 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(55 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
(40 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(65 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Esperanto for "run away"
(52 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Stress and vowel length in Tirelat
(57 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(64 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Esperanto for "run away"
(45 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress and vowel length in Tirelat
(65 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress and vowel length in Tirelat
(119 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Books at Lulu.com
(48 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?
(49 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
(59 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Esperanto for "run away"
(40 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Most common consonant cluster types cross-linguistically
(42 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books at Lulu.com
(53 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most common consonant cluster types cross-linguistically
(72 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
(70 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Esperanto for "run away"
(48 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?
(69 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Esperanto for "run away"
(36 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Esperanto for "run away"
(50 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?
(43 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books at Lulu.com
(50 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress and vowel length in Tirelat
(90 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books at Lulu.com
(57 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Esperanto for "run away"
(57 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most common consonant cluster types cross-linguistically
(69 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?
(44 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(31 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(50 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
(47 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress and vowel length in Tirelat
(127 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress and vowel length in Tirelat
(57 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most common consonant cluster types cross-linguistically
(40 lines)
From:
J. 'Mach' Wust <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?
(50 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants
(49 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(72 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books at Lulu.com
(31 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(49 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(58 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(54 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: USAGE: Esperanto for "run away"
(59 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Velar and uvular fricatives and approximants (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(49 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
CXS and IPA symbols for uvular approximant
(44 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(55 lines)
From:
Lars Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(45 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books at Lulu.com
(66 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(66 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most common consonant cluster types cross-linguistically
(54 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(50 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Clones (was: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?))
(53 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(81 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most common consonant cluster types cross-linguistically
(103 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Most common consonant cluster types cross-linguistically
(138 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Stress and vowel length in Tirelat
(90 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Clones (was: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?))
(45 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books at Lulu.com
(32 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(56 lines)
From:
J R <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(37 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(61 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(67 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(40 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
"Register" a grammatical term
(30 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(50 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Register" a grammatical term
(58 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(56 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Grammar checker
(31 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Clones
(36 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants
(44 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books at Lulu.com
(38 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(71 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(42 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Register" a grammatical term
(57 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Clones
(63 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
(47 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: OT: Clones
(47 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(64 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(44 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
(52 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(75 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(58 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
(41 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
(56 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Register" a grammatical term
(57 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(59 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Register" a grammatical term
(69 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(92 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books at Lulu.com
(41 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(39 lines)
From:
Ollock Ackeop <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books at Lulu.com
(48 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
TECH: info on ftp
(40 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(40 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(60 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(98 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(56 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(44 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: info on ftp
(60 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants
(58 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books at Lulu.com
(32 lines)
From:
Rick Harrison <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: info on ftp
(75 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Books at Lulu.com
(42 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(65 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(66 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: info on ftp
(69 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hebrew waw consecutive (was: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc)
(47 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: info on ftp
(53 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants
(50 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(70 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(51 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: TECH: info on ftp
(52 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(70 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(47 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
CV metathesis Q
(31 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(76 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CV metathesis Q
(104 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CV metathesis Q
(65 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(69 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CV metathesis Q
(49 lines)
From:
Carl Banks <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(65 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(40 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(65 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(79 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(51 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(41 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(52 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(39 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grammar checker
(36 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CV metathesis Q
(59 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(46 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Vowel length near-minimal pairs in Tirelat
(64 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(57 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel length near-minimal pairs in Tirelat
(51 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Tonal inflection?
(40 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(55 lines)
From:
Roger Mills <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(72 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(65 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(84 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hebrew waw consecutive (was: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc)
(46 lines)
From:
Veoler <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(133 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(64 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grammar checker
(46 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)
(52 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(71 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(141 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants
(45 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(51 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc
(45 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grammar checker
(49 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(93 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(96 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(108 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc
(55 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(99 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants
(68 lines)
From:
Al Green <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(62 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(75 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Communal/collaborative languages now possible at CALS
(82 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(92 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tonal inflection?
(44 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(50 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(73 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(45 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants
(50 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(55 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Register" a grammatical term
(75 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(46 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Register" a grammatical term
(49 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(81 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
YAEPT: [D]/[T] (< Sibilants)
(66 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Phonology - Allophone presentation?
(33 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants
(52 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology - Allophone presentation?
(62 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tonal inflection?
(73 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology - Allophone presentation?
(77 lines)
From:
Aidan Grey <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Tonal inflection?
(60 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Phonology - Allophone presentation?
(45 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(57 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants
(83 lines)
From:
Tristan McLeay <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Vowel length near-minimal pairs in Tirelat
(62 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants
(52 lines)
From:
Henrik Theiling <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(203 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(66 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(67 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Sibilants
(83 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(96 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(63 lines)
From:
Andreas Johansson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(68 lines)
From:
[log in to unmask]
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(48 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(53 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(132 lines)
From:
R A Brown <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Register" a grammatical term
(70 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Social deixis, familiarity, etc.
(84 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(140 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(45 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(76 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(65 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(51 lines)
From:
Lars Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Register" a grammatical term
(87 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc
(69 lines)
From:
Daniel Prohaska <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(52 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Going no-mail for a week or so
(28 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Register" a grammatical term
(74 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(71 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(58 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Hebrew waw consecutive
(48 lines)
From:
David McCann <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Register" a grammatical term
(52 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(58 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(56 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(48 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(61 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(68 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: CV metathesis Q
(62 lines)
From:
Jeffrey Jones <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(44 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Grammar checker
(40 lines)
From:
Arthaey Angosii <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)
(36 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(102 lines)
From:
Ollock Ackeop <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(87 lines)
From:
Ollock Ackeop <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(59 lines)
From:
Lars Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(41 lines)
From:
Lars Mathiesen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Register" a grammatical term
(46 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: "Register" a grammatical term
(57 lines)
From:
Dana Nutter <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(64 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc.
(56 lines)
From:
Eric Christopherson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU