Conlang
Mailing List September 2008, week 5
Sort by
Author
|
Date
| Topic
Chronologically |
Most recent first
Options
Show author |
Hide author
Show table of contents |
Hide table of contents
Navigation
Back to main CONLANG page
Join or leave CONLANG (or change settings)
Search Archives
Table of contents:
A verb that requires an adverb?
Arabic greeting (was: Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs)
(9 messages)
Chat/OT: Pronunciation in Helloween's "Dr. Stein"
(4 messages)
Colorless green ideas
(2 messages)
Do your conlangs affect each other?
(2 messages)
Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation
(7 messages)
Newest natlang?
(11 messages)
quadrivalent verb
(22 messages)
Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs
(7 messages)
Subtitling
(5 messages)
Subtitling (was: Newest natlang?)
(8 messages)
A verb that requires an adverb?
A verb that requires an adverb?
(57 lines)
From:
Gary Shannon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Arabic greeting (was: Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs)
Arabic greeting (was: Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs)
(57 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic greeting (was: Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs)
(51 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic greeting (was: Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs)
(55 lines)
From:
M. Czapp <
[log in to unmask]
>
Arabic greeting (was: Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs)
(63 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic greeting (was: Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs)
(43 lines)
From:
Matthew Turnbull <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic greeting (was: Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs)
(38 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic greeting (was: Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs)
(38 lines)
From:
Tim Smith <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Arabic greeting (was: Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs)
(65 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Arabic greeting (was: Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs)
(45 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Chat/OT: Pronunciation in Helloween's "Dr. Stein"
Chat/OT: Pronunciation in Helloween's "Dr. Stein"
(71 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chat/OT: Pronunciation in Helloween's "Dr. Stein"
(54 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chat/OT: Pronunciation in Helloween's "Dr. Stein"
(84 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Chat/OT: Pronunciation in Helloween's "Dr. Stein"
(57 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Colorless green ideas
Re: Colorless green ideas
(59 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Colorless green ideas
(49 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Do your conlangs affect each other?
Re: Do your conlangs affect each other?
(39 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Do your conlangs affect each other?
(52 lines)
From:
Jörg Rhiemeier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation
Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation
(156 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation
(80 lines)
From:
John Vertical <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation
(103 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation
(59 lines)
From:
Herman Miller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation
(86 lines)
From:
Alex Fink <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation
(127 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Kjaginic: 8 points of articulation
(78 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Newest natlang?
Re: Newest natlang?
(95 lines)
From:
David J. Peterson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newest natlang?
(47 lines)
From:
René Uittenbogaard <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newest natlang?
(66 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newest natlang?
(40 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newest natlang?
(104 lines)
From:
Dirk Elzinga <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newest natlang?
(43 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newest natlang?
(31 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newest natlang?
(38 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newest natlang?
(54 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newest natlang?
(63 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Newest natlang?
(38 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
quadrivalent verb
quadrivalent verb
(50 lines)
From:
Kenneth Asad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(38 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(30 lines)
From:
Larry Sulky <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(190 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(38 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(44 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(35 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(68 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(49 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(69 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(88 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(41 lines)
From:
Philip Newton <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(45 lines)
From:
taliesin the storyteller <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(44 lines)
From:
Kenneth Asad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(47 lines)
From:
Kenneth Asad <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(55 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(96 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(46 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(20 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(123 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(50 lines)
From:
Lars Finsen <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: quadrivalent verb
(151 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs
Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs
(65 lines)
From:
Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs
(91 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs
(47 lines)
From:
Peter Collier <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs
(99 lines)
From:
Jim Henry <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs
(51 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs
(52 lines)
From:
ROGER MILLS <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Somewhat Off-Topic: thinking in conlangs
(43 lines)
From:
Michael Poxon <
[log in to unmask]
>
Subtitling
Re: Subtitling
(74 lines)
From:
Benct Philip Jonsson <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subtitling
(34 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subtitling
(38 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subtitling
(26 lines)
From:
Eldin Raigmore <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subtitling
(44 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Subtitling (was: Newest natlang?)
Re: Subtitling (was: Newest natlang?)
(64 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subtitling (was: Newest natlang?)
(92 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subtitling (was: Newest natlang?)
(46 lines)
From:
Chris Peters <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subtitling (was: Newest natlang?)
(112 lines)
From:
Eugene Oh <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subtitling (was: Newest natlang?)
(45 lines)
From:
caeruleancentaur <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subtitling (was: Newest natlang?)
(43 lines)
From:
Mark J. Reed <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subtitling (was: Newest natlang?)
(53 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Re: Subtitling (was: Newest natlang?)
(47 lines)
From:
deinx nxtxr <
[log in to unmask]
>
Back to the main CONLANG page
LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU